If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The perfect camera, part 2
Hi,
Some days ago I started a thread about my displeasure with modern point-and-shoot camera's. Now I would like to elaborate on the proposal to use 3 release buttons instead of one. Suppose you want to focus on your main subject, which you want to be in the right lower corner of the picture. Thus you point your camera to this main subject, press the shutter half way so the auto-focus can do its job, move the camera to the left, press the shutter fully. If you want to make 10 versions of this photo, e.g. because the main subject is a child that makes a lot of funny moves, then you have to repeat this whole procedure 10 times. Owners of old-fashioned camera's had an easier life: they set the distance one time, and then only had to concentrate on pushing the shutter button at the right moment. So I propose to introduce a dedicated button to set the distance. This button should lock in lower position, and unlock if pushed for the second time. If this button is in upper position, then the camera auto-focusses as usual. How do you think about this? Are there other shooting situations that often occur and that require a different solution? Regards, Wouter Boeke |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The perfect camera, part 2
W.Boeke wrote:
: Hi, : Some days ago I started a thread about my displeasure with : modern point-and-shoot camera's. Now I would like to elaborate : on the proposal to use 3 release buttons instead of one. : Suppose you want to focus on your main subject, which you want : to be in the right lower corner of the picture. Thus you point : your camera to this main subject, press the shutter half way so : the auto-focus can do its job, move the camera to the left, press : the shutter fully. If you want to make 10 versions of this photo, : e.g. because the main subject is a child that makes a lot of funny : moves, then you have to repeat this whole procedure 10 times. : Owners of old-fashioned camera's had an easier life: they set : the distance one time, and then only had to concentrate on pushing : the shutter button at the right moment. So I propose to introduce : a dedicated button to set the distance. This button should lock in : lower position, and unlock if pushed for the second time. If this : button is in upper position, then the camera auto-focusses as usual. : How do you think about this? Are there other shooting situations : that often occur and that require a different solution? : Regards, : Wouter Boeke I can see where that could be a good thing for some people. But for the vast majority of "beginner" level people (who many of the P&S cameras are aimed at) adding one more button that can be bumped or accidentally pushed increases the number of tech-support calls from frantic consumers. This is the same reason that many of the lower priced P&S cameras make true manual control difficult to engage (if there is any manual operation available at all. On the other hand those of us who are a little more interrested in having manual controls available may tend toward SLR type cameras. And they DO have the ability to perform the operations you describe. I can take my DSLR camera, point the AF point at the subject, half press to engage the AF, slip the AF switch to manual (locking the focus), and recompose the image before fully pressing the shutter release. I can even lock the F-stop and shutter speed with a single button (or can set that button to lock one or the other). Or I can set the camera to Manual and manually select all the parameters that will then remain locked until I reset them or reselect another auto or partly auto setting. I guess that the problem is that the manufacturers of pocket sized P&S cameras are aiming their products to the vast majority of casual photo takers who have little (and want little) interrest in learning how to use the equipment to its utmost. It is assumed (maybe incorrectly) that if someone wants more direct control we will either pay BIG bucks for some extreemly complex pocket sized camera or move up to a DSLR. JMHO Randy ========== Randy Berbaum Champaign, IL |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The perfect camera, part 2
W.Boeke wrote:
Hi, Some days ago I started a thread about my displeasure with modern point-and-shoot camera's. Now I would like to elaborate on the proposal to use 3 release buttons instead of one. Suppose you want to focus on your main subject, which you want to be in the right lower corner of the picture. Thus you point your camera to this main subject, press the shutter half way so the auto-focus can do its job, move the camera to the left, press the shutter fully. If you want to make 10 versions of this photo, e.g. because the main subject is a child that makes a lot of funny moves, then you have to repeat this whole procedure 10 times. The Canon A510 can lock both focus and exposure; so go through the process for photo1, and you're "perfect" for photos 2-10 BugBear |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The perfect camera, part 2
W.Boeke wrote:
Hi, Some days ago I started a thread about my displeasure with modern point-and-shoot camera's. Now I would like to elaborate on the proposal to use 3 release buttons instead of one. Suppose you want to focus on your main subject, which you want to be in the right lower corner of the picture. Thus you point your camera to this main subject, press the shutter half way so the auto-focus can do its job, move the camera to the left, press the shutter fully. If you want to make 10 versions of this photo, e.g. because the main subject is a child that makes a lot of funny moves, then you have to repeat this whole procedure 10 times. Owners of old-fashioned camera's had an easier life: they set the distance one time, and then only had to concentrate on pushing the shutter button at the right moment. So I propose to introduce a dedicated button to set the distance. This button should lock in lower position, and unlock if pushed for the second time. If this button is in upper position, then the camera auto-focusses as usual. How do you think about this? Are there other shooting situations that often occur and that require a different solution? Regards, Wouter Boeke Some cameras already allow you to lock the focus and or choose an areas of the viewfinder to use for focusing or will focus on the closest of a number of areas within the viewfinder. These tools work quite well. The trick, like the trick of several release buttons is knowing your camera. If you are a casual user, there are going to be many features you don't know well enough to use them to their fullest. -- Joseph Meehan Dia duit |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The perfect camera, part 2
"W.Boeke" wrote in message . .. Owners of old-fashioned camera's had an easier life: they set the distance one time, and then only had to concentrate on pushing the shutter button at the right moment. So I propose to introduce a dedicated button to set the distance. This button should lock in lower position, and unlock if pushed for the second time. If this button is in upper position, then the camera auto-focusses as usual. How do you think about this? Are there other shooting situations that often occur and that require a different solution? Dunno about still cameras, but pro and prosumer digital videos aready have that. It's called focus-lock. In addition, Canon cameras have n-point focusing that can follow your eye - in essence, it focuses upon what you look at. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The perfect camera, part 2
"W.Boeke" wrote in message . .. Hi, [clipped] If you want to make 10 versions of this photo, e.g. because the main subject is a child that makes a lot of funny moves, then you have to repeat this whole procedure 10 times. Regards, Wouter Boeke Send the kid outside to play! Bill Crocker |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The perfect camera, part 2
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:01:26 +0200, "W.Boeke"
wrote: Hi, Some days ago I started a thread about my displeasure with modern point-and-shoot camera's. Now I would like to elaborate on the proposal to use 3 release buttons instead of one. Suppose you want to focus on your main subject, which you want to be in the right lower corner of the picture. Thus you point your camera to this main subject, press the shutter half way so the auto-focus can do its job, move the camera to the left, press the shutter fully. If you want to make 10 versions of this photo, e.g. because the main subject is a child that makes a lot of funny moves, then you have to repeat this whole procedure 10 times. Owners of old-fashioned camera's had an easier life: they set the distance one time, and then only had to concentrate on pushing the shutter button at the right moment. So I propose to introduce a dedicated button to set the distance. This button should lock in lower position, and unlock if pushed for the second time. If this button is in upper position, then the camera auto-focusses as usual. How do you think about this? Are there other shooting situations that often occur and that require a different solution? Regards, Wouter Boeke Wouter Boeke, As others have already stated, it's a nice idea but the added button would just be an additional hazard to most P&S owners who never learn how to get the most out of their cameras. Many often forget or don't know how or when to use EC (Exposure Compensation) even when it's very easy on most P&S cameras. Let's face it, technology has made the average person lazy. About 97% of Americans buy a vehicle with an *automatic* transition & *never* learn to drive a *standard/manual* shift vehicle. Now here's an idea that takes the best part of your suggestion & places it where it's very easy to repeatedly use without fear of pressing the wrong button(s). Basically you pre-program your P&S camera's "C" (Custom) mode to create a hyperfocal mode of your choice. Yes I know, not all P&S cameras have this feature but many do. This was not my idea, so I will give credit were it's due & post the web address where I 1st found it: http://albert.achtung.com/cameras/A80/index7.html#SNAP Note this refers to the Canon A80, however the basic principle will work with most newer Canon P&S cameras as well as many other brands & models with this feature. Because P&S cameras have a great deal of DOF (Depth Of Field), this works very good & can also be very useful in very low light situations where AF may have problems. Rather then explain it all here, I'll let you got to the link where it's explained in detail. You need not make it a true hyperfocal mode where the picture is in acceptable focus from x distance to infinity. You can program in a manual focus distance that will yield good focus from x distance to x distance. That's what works best for me because I don't care if the background is in focus & in fact, I would rather that it not be. A last example of the average P&S camera user is how very few ever use exposures longer than 2 seconds even when shooting night scenes of stationary objects like illuminated buildings. Most Canon P&S cameras will automatically employ *Dark Frame Subtraction* noise reduction for any exposure of 1.3 seconds or longer. This feature works very well & can make the difference between a grainy night picture & a very clean picture than many would think came from a DSLR. If you use this feature I would suggest the following: 1 Set the camera on a tripod, bean bag or anything that's stable. 2 Set the ISO to it's lowest, ISO 50-100 on most P&S cameras. 3 Set the self timer to avoid camera movement. 4 Set MF (Manual Focus) for some situations. 5 Use EC if needed to get the best exposure. 6 Set a manual WB (White Balance), Tungsten often works best. 7 Check the result & adjust & repeat if & as needed. Note: The P&S camera's "C" (Custom) mode could be used for this function instead of using it as a hyperfocal mode. Enough said, I hope some of this is of value to somebody. Respectfully, DHB "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The perfect camera, part 2
On 10/9/06 11:37 AM, in article , "DHB" wrote: Let's face it, technology has made the average person lazy. About 97% of Americans buy a vehicle with an *automatic* transition & *never* learn to drive a *standard/manual* shift vehicle. Most of my transitions are are conscious, not automatic, I think... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The perfect camera, part 2
W.Boeke wrote:
Hi, Some days ago I started a thread about my displeasure with modern point-and-shoot camera's. Now I would like to elaborate on the proposal to use 3 release buttons instead of one. Suppose you want to focus on your main subject, which you want to be in the right lower corner of the picture. Thus you point your camera to this main subject, press the shutter half way so the auto-focus can do its job, move the camera to the left, press the shutter fully. If you want to make 10 versions of this photo, e.g. because the main subject is a child that makes a lot of funny moves, then you have to repeat this whole procedure 10 times. Owners of old-fashioned camera's had an easier life: they set the distance one time, and then only had to concentrate on pushing the shutter button at the right moment. So I propose to introduce a dedicated button to set the distance. This button should lock in lower position, and unlock if pushed for the second time. If this button is in upper position, then the camera auto-focusses as usual. How do you think about this? Are there other shooting situations that often occur and that require a different solution? Regards, Wouter Boeke Maybe you could just turn off auto focus? At least on many DSLRs you can do just that. -- Joseph Meehan Dia duit |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The perfect camera, part 2
W.Boeke wrote:
Hi, Some days ago I started a thread about my displeasure with modern point-and-shoot camera's. Now I would like to elaborate on the proposal to use 3 release buttons instead of one. Suppose you want to focus on your main subject, which you want to be in the right lower corner of the picture. Thus you point your camera to this main subject, press the shutter half way so the auto-focus can do its job, move the camera to the left, press the shutter fully. If you want to make 10 versions of this photo, e.g. because the main subject is a child that makes a lot of funny moves, then you have to repeat this whole procedure 10 times. Owners of old-fashioned camera's had an easier life: they set the distance one time, and then only had to concentrate on pushing the shutter button at the right moment. So I propose to introduce a dedicated button to set the distance. This button should lock in lower position, and unlock if pushed for the second time. If this button is in upper position, then the camera auto-focusses as usual. How do you think about this? Are there other shooting situations that often occur and that require a different solution? Check out the Panasonic Lumix LX-1. It has an AF/AE lock button, and a switch on the lens housing that lets you easily switch to manual focus. In the situation you describe, I could focus on the subject by depressing the shutter halfway and then either press the AF/AE lock button or switch to manual focus, either of which would lock the focus where you want it. Most P&S cameras are crap, but there are a few good ones out there, you just have to find them. -Gniewko |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How To Find The Best Digital Camera | laramarket | Digital Photography | 1 | August 8th 06 11:51 PM |
MACRO SHOTS QUESTION | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 46 | July 10th 06 02:44 PM |
The f/ratio myth and camera size | Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark) | Digital Photography | 55 | February 9th 06 03:04 AM |
How to Buy a Digital Camera | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | January 18th 05 03:39 PM |
Starting camera - Part III | Scott M. Knowles | Large Format Photography Equipment | 5 | June 23rd 04 11:48 PM |