A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Canon 1D Mark II Settings



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 5th 04, 02:06 AM
Brian Stirling
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Canon 1D Mark II Settings

I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little
time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings
provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result.
I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2,
but would appreciate any advise on the best settings.

I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night)
so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if
you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is
-- is this true.

Also, I just changed the "Color Matrix" from the default 1 (Standard)
to 4 (Adobe RGB), but I don't know if this is the correct setting to
use. It looks like the filenames have changed with the new settings
with the filenames with the default settings appearing like
"KS2I0018.CR2" whereas the filenames now look like "_S2I0140.CR2" with
an underscore preceding the rest of the filename. Is this new
filename scheme associated with the Adobe RGB setting for the color
matrix?

Perhaps someone might be so kind as to list the non-default settings
they use on their 1D Mark II and why...


I mostly do landscape work but will delve into wildlife in about 6
weeks.


Thanks,


Brian
  #4  
Old November 5th 04, 02:38 AM
GT40
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 19:06:51 -0700, Brian Stirling
wrote:

I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little
time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings
provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result.
I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2,
but would appreciate any advise on the best settings.

I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night)
so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if
you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is
-- is this true.


If you shoot in RAW mode, then the sharpening etc doesn't get applied
to the images. Nothing else gets applied either. Try using the RAW
+ JPEG, and look at the difference.
  #5  
Old November 5th 04, 02:38 AM
GT40
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 19:06:51 -0700, Brian Stirling
wrote:

I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little
time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings
provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result.
I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2,
but would appreciate any advise on the best settings.

I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night)
so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if
you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is
-- is this true.


If you shoot in RAW mode, then the sharpening etc doesn't get applied
to the images. Nothing else gets applied either. Try using the RAW
+ JPEG, and look at the difference.
  #6  
Old November 5th 04, 04:00 AM
andre
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Brian Stirling wrote:
I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little
time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings
provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result.
I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2,
but would appreciate any advise on the best settings.


No sharpening gets applied to raw shots. What you see is what comes out
of the CCD after applying beyer interpolation (actually the raw does not
even contain that but only a 12 bit brightness value for each pixel, the
software does the interpolation).
The idea is to give you all possibilities to use whatever sharpen tool /
algorithm you want. If you want to learn more about the RAW workflow go
to outbackphoto.com.


I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night)
so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if
you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is
-- is this true.


Yes.

Also, I just changed the "Color Matrix" from the default 1 (Standard)
to 4 (Adobe RGB), but I don't know if this is the correct setting to
use. It looks like the filenames have changed with the new settings
with the filenames with the default settings appearing like
"KS2I0018.CR2" whereas the filenames now look like "_S2I0140.CR2" with
an underscore preceding the rest of the filename. Is this new
filename scheme associated with the Adobe RGB setting for the color
matrix?

Adobe RGB is your choice for printing. Make sure you calibrate your
screen (gamma) to match your printouts. This might take a few trials but
is well worth it.

Perhaps someone might be so kind as to list the non-default settings
they use on their 1D Mark II and why...


I wish I could. Can't afford this cam.


Andre


--
----------------------------------
http://www.aguntherphotography.com
  #7  
Old November 5th 04, 04:00 AM
andre
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Brian Stirling wrote:
I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little
time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings
provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result.
I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2,
but would appreciate any advise on the best settings.


No sharpening gets applied to raw shots. What you see is what comes out
of the CCD after applying beyer interpolation (actually the raw does not
even contain that but only a 12 bit brightness value for each pixel, the
software does the interpolation).
The idea is to give you all possibilities to use whatever sharpen tool /
algorithm you want. If you want to learn more about the RAW workflow go
to outbackphoto.com.


I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night)
so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if
you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is
-- is this true.


Yes.

Also, I just changed the "Color Matrix" from the default 1 (Standard)
to 4 (Adobe RGB), but I don't know if this is the correct setting to
use. It looks like the filenames have changed with the new settings
with the filenames with the default settings appearing like
"KS2I0018.CR2" whereas the filenames now look like "_S2I0140.CR2" with
an underscore preceding the rest of the filename. Is this new
filename scheme associated with the Adobe RGB setting for the color
matrix?

Adobe RGB is your choice for printing. Make sure you calibrate your
screen (gamma) to match your printouts. This might take a few trials but
is well worth it.

Perhaps someone might be so kind as to list the non-default settings
they use on their 1D Mark II and why...


I wish I could. Can't afford this cam.


Andre


--
----------------------------------
http://www.aguntherphotography.com
  #8  
Old November 5th 04, 06:21 AM
PhotoMan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Brian Stirling wrote:
I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little
time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings
provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result.
I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2,
but would appreciate any advise on the best settings.
I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night)
so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if
you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is
-- is this true.
Also, I just changed the "Color Matrix" from the default 1 (Standard)
to 4 (Adobe RGB), but I don't know if this is the correct setting to
use. It looks like the filenames have changed with the new settings
with the filenames with the default settings appearing like
"KS2I0018.CR2" whereas the filenames now look like "_S2I0140.CR2" with
an underscore preceding the rest of the filename. Is this new
filename scheme associated with the Adobe RGB setting for the color
matrix?
Perhaps someone might be so kind as to list the non-default settings
they use on their 1D Mark II and why...
I mostly do landscape work but will delve into wildlife in about 6


Hi Brian -
Canon recently made the following PDF file available:
http://www.photoworkshop.com/canon/EOS_Digital.pdf
I printed it (35 pages), and it's by far the best written tutorial I've ever
read about any camera system. If THIS doesn't help you, you'd better just
get some colored pencils and a sketch book. :-)
Regards,
Joe Arnold

Let us know what you think of it.


  #9  
Old November 5th 04, 06:21 AM
PhotoMan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Brian Stirling wrote:
I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little
time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings
provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result.
I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2,
but would appreciate any advise on the best settings.
I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night)
so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if
you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is
-- is this true.
Also, I just changed the "Color Matrix" from the default 1 (Standard)
to 4 (Adobe RGB), but I don't know if this is the correct setting to
use. It looks like the filenames have changed with the new settings
with the filenames with the default settings appearing like
"KS2I0018.CR2" whereas the filenames now look like "_S2I0140.CR2" with
an underscore preceding the rest of the filename. Is this new
filename scheme associated with the Adobe RGB setting for the color
matrix?
Perhaps someone might be so kind as to list the non-default settings
they use on their 1D Mark II and why...
I mostly do landscape work but will delve into wildlife in about 6


Hi Brian -
Canon recently made the following PDF file available:
http://www.photoworkshop.com/canon/EOS_Digital.pdf
I printed it (35 pages), and it's by far the best written tutorial I've ever
read about any camera system. If THIS doesn't help you, you'd better just
get some colored pencils and a sketch book. :-)
Regards,
Joe Arnold

Let us know what you think of it.


  #10  
Old November 5th 04, 07:09 AM
Brian Stirling
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 04:00:00 GMT, andre
wrote:

Brian Stirling wrote:
I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little
time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings
provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result.
I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2,
but would appreciate any advise on the best settings.


No sharpening gets applied to raw shots. What you see is what comes out
of the CCD after applying beyer interpolation (actually the raw does not
even contain that but only a 12 bit brightness value for each pixel, the
software does the interpolation).
The idea is to give you all possibilities to use whatever sharpen tool /
algorithm you want. If you want to learn more about the RAW workflow go
to outbackphoto.com.

This is what I thought but I just wanted to make sure. The images
before sharpening are softer than the D100 I used before the 1D Mark
II. Of course with the D100 there is no way to set sharpening off,
but as I always shot in RAW in shouldn't make a difference what the
setting is in the camera.

I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night)
so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if
you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is
-- is this true.


Yes.

Also, I just changed the "Color Matrix" from the default 1 (Standard)
to 4 (Adobe RGB), but I don't know if this is the correct setting to
use. It looks like the filenames have changed with the new settings
with the filenames with the default settings appearing like
"KS2I0018.CR2" whereas the filenames now look like "_S2I0140.CR2" with
an underscore preceding the rest of the filename. Is this new
filename scheme associated with the Adobe RGB setting for the color
matrix?

Adobe RGB is your choice for printing. Make sure you calibrate your
screen (gamma) to match your printouts. This might take a few trials but
is well worth it.


I do need to do this (I have a Viewsonic VX2000 20" LCD display (1600
x 1200 resolution). I wonder how best to do this without using the
spider thing.

Perhaps someone might be so kind as to list the non-default settings
they use on their 1D Mark II and why...


I wish I could. Can't afford this cam.


Andre


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CANON - The Great Innovator (was: CANON – The Great Pretender) Steven M. Scharf Digital Photography 104 September 3rd 04 01:01 PM
Canon S500 or Sony W1 luke Digital Photography 9 August 31st 04 03:47 AM
300D Mark II RTJ Digital Photography 69 August 27th 04 10:57 PM
Lift off with the Nikon D70!!! Dallas 35mm Photo Equipment 132 August 23rd 04 06:37 PM
Canon 10d or Nikon D70. Dmanfish Digital Photography 102 August 18th 04 12:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.