If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Canon 1D Mark II Settings
I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little
time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result. I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2, but would appreciate any advise on the best settings. I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night) so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is -- is this true. Also, I just changed the "Color Matrix" from the default 1 (Standard) to 4 (Adobe RGB), but I don't know if this is the correct setting to use. It looks like the filenames have changed with the new settings with the filenames with the default settings appearing like "KS2I0018.CR2" whereas the filenames now look like "_S2I0140.CR2" with an underscore preceding the rest of the filename. Is this new filename scheme associated with the Adobe RGB setting for the color matrix? Perhaps someone might be so kind as to list the non-default settings they use on their 1D Mark II and why... I mostly do landscape work but will delve into wildlife in about 6 weeks. Thanks, Brian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 19:06:51 -0700, Brian Stirling
wrote: I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result. I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2, but would appreciate any advise on the best settings. I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night) so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is -- is this true. If you shoot in RAW mode, then the sharpening etc doesn't get applied to the images. Nothing else gets applied either. Try using the RAW + JPEG, and look at the difference. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 19:06:51 -0700, Brian Stirling
wrote: I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result. I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2, but would appreciate any advise on the best settings. I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night) so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is -- is this true. If you shoot in RAW mode, then the sharpening etc doesn't get applied to the images. Nothing else gets applied either. Try using the RAW + JPEG, and look at the difference. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Brian Stirling wrote:
I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result. I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2, but would appreciate any advise on the best settings. No sharpening gets applied to raw shots. What you see is what comes out of the CCD after applying beyer interpolation (actually the raw does not even contain that but only a 12 bit brightness value for each pixel, the software does the interpolation). The idea is to give you all possibilities to use whatever sharpen tool / algorithm you want. If you want to learn more about the RAW workflow go to outbackphoto.com. I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night) so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is -- is this true. Yes. Also, I just changed the "Color Matrix" from the default 1 (Standard) to 4 (Adobe RGB), but I don't know if this is the correct setting to use. It looks like the filenames have changed with the new settings with the filenames with the default settings appearing like "KS2I0018.CR2" whereas the filenames now look like "_S2I0140.CR2" with an underscore preceding the rest of the filename. Is this new filename scheme associated with the Adobe RGB setting for the color matrix? Adobe RGB is your choice for printing. Make sure you calibrate your screen (gamma) to match your printouts. This might take a few trials but is well worth it. Perhaps someone might be so kind as to list the non-default settings they use on their 1D Mark II and why... I wish I could. Can't afford this cam. Andre -- ---------------------------------- http://www.aguntherphotography.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Brian Stirling wrote:
I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result. I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2, but would appreciate any advise on the best settings. No sharpening gets applied to raw shots. What you see is what comes out of the CCD after applying beyer interpolation (actually the raw does not even contain that but only a 12 bit brightness value for each pixel, the software does the interpolation). The idea is to give you all possibilities to use whatever sharpen tool / algorithm you want. If you want to learn more about the RAW workflow go to outbackphoto.com. I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night) so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is -- is this true. Yes. Also, I just changed the "Color Matrix" from the default 1 (Standard) to 4 (Adobe RGB), but I don't know if this is the correct setting to use. It looks like the filenames have changed with the new settings with the filenames with the default settings appearing like "KS2I0018.CR2" whereas the filenames now look like "_S2I0140.CR2" with an underscore preceding the rest of the filename. Is this new filename scheme associated with the Adobe RGB setting for the color matrix? Adobe RGB is your choice for printing. Make sure you calibrate your screen (gamma) to match your printouts. This might take a few trials but is well worth it. Perhaps someone might be so kind as to list the non-default settings they use on their 1D Mark II and why... I wish I could. Can't afford this cam. Andre -- ---------------------------------- http://www.aguntherphotography.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Brian Stirling wrote:
I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result. I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2, but would appreciate any advise on the best settings. I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night) so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is -- is this true. Also, I just changed the "Color Matrix" from the default 1 (Standard) to 4 (Adobe RGB), but I don't know if this is the correct setting to use. It looks like the filenames have changed with the new settings with the filenames with the default settings appearing like "KS2I0018.CR2" whereas the filenames now look like "_S2I0140.CR2" with an underscore preceding the rest of the filename. Is this new filename scheme associated with the Adobe RGB setting for the color matrix? Perhaps someone might be so kind as to list the non-default settings they use on their 1D Mark II and why... I mostly do landscape work but will delve into wildlife in about 6 Hi Brian - Canon recently made the following PDF file available: http://www.photoworkshop.com/canon/EOS_Digital.pdf I printed it (35 pages), and it's by far the best written tutorial I've ever read about any camera system. If THIS doesn't help you, you'd better just get some colored pencils and a sketch book. :-) Regards, Joe Arnold Let us know what you think of it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Brian Stirling wrote:
I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result. I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2, but would appreciate any advise on the best settings. I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night) so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is -- is this true. Also, I just changed the "Color Matrix" from the default 1 (Standard) to 4 (Adobe RGB), but I don't know if this is the correct setting to use. It looks like the filenames have changed with the new settings with the filenames with the default settings appearing like "KS2I0018.CR2" whereas the filenames now look like "_S2I0140.CR2" with an underscore preceding the rest of the filename. Is this new filename scheme associated with the Adobe RGB setting for the color matrix? Perhaps someone might be so kind as to list the non-default settings they use on their 1D Mark II and why... I mostly do landscape work but will delve into wildlife in about 6 Hi Brian - Canon recently made the following PDF file available: http://www.photoworkshop.com/canon/EOS_Digital.pdf I printed it (35 pages), and it's by far the best written tutorial I've ever read about any camera system. If THIS doesn't help you, you'd better just get some colored pencils and a sketch book. :-) Regards, Joe Arnold Let us know what you think of it. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 04:00:00 GMT, andre
wrote: Brian Stirling wrote: I just received my new Canon 1D Mark II and have had only a little time to play with it but I have noticed the standard RAW settings provide no sharpening and the images do look quite soft as a result. I have selected "Set 1" for my parameter with the sharpening set to 2, but would appreciate any advise on the best settings. No sharpening gets applied to raw shots. What you see is what comes out of the CCD after applying beyer interpolation (actually the raw does not even contain that but only a 12 bit brightness value for each pixel, the software does the interpolation). The idea is to give you all possibilities to use whatever sharpen tool / algorithm you want. If you want to learn more about the RAW workflow go to outbackphoto.com. This is what I thought but I just wanted to make sure. The images before sharpening are softer than the D100 I used before the 1D Mark II. Of course with the D100 there is no way to set sharpening off, but as I always shot in RAW in shouldn't make a difference what the setting is in the camera. I should point out that I have PS CS (upgraded from 7.01 last night) so I can alter the images as I wish. It was my understanding that if you shoot in RAW it does not matter what the setting for sharpening is -- is this true. Yes. Also, I just changed the "Color Matrix" from the default 1 (Standard) to 4 (Adobe RGB), but I don't know if this is the correct setting to use. It looks like the filenames have changed with the new settings with the filenames with the default settings appearing like "KS2I0018.CR2" whereas the filenames now look like "_S2I0140.CR2" with an underscore preceding the rest of the filename. Is this new filename scheme associated with the Adobe RGB setting for the color matrix? Adobe RGB is your choice for printing. Make sure you calibrate your screen (gamma) to match your printouts. This might take a few trials but is well worth it. I do need to do this (I have a Viewsonic VX2000 20" LCD display (1600 x 1200 resolution). I wonder how best to do this without using the spider thing. Perhaps someone might be so kind as to list the non-default settings they use on their 1D Mark II and why... I wish I could. Can't afford this cam. Andre |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CANON - The Great Innovator (was: CANON – The Great Pretender) | Steven M. Scharf | Digital Photography | 104 | September 3rd 04 01:01 PM |
Canon S500 or Sony W1 | luke | Digital Photography | 9 | August 31st 04 03:47 AM |
300D Mark II | RTJ | Digital Photography | 69 | August 27th 04 10:57 PM |
Lift off with the Nikon D70!!! | Dallas | 35mm Photo Equipment | 132 | August 23rd 04 06:37 PM |
Canon 10d or Nikon D70. | Dmanfish | Digital Photography | 102 | August 18th 04 12:26 PM |