A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Canon 20D: Full dpreview



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 3rd 04, 03:11 PM
deryck lant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Canon 20D: Full dpreview

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos20d/

Phil is becoming sloppy with many errors and omissions.

I couldn't find the low-light AF focus test.

Or shot to shot time using single shot in Raw after the purposely
restricted 6 shot buffer.

The centre focus cross type sensor does operate with aperture f5.6
as well as f2.8. At F2.8 the sensor uses different elements giving 3
times the accuracy.

No mention of lens used in today's samples gallery. I didn't bother to
explore the EXIF data.

Pity the shutter/mirror are so loud. It would have been an ideal camera
for use in available light work during live performances in theatre.

The response from Nikon will be fascinating. Trouble is a long time to
hang on for. Release at the PMA show but not available until later on year.

Nikon have promised 5 tiers of DSLR cameras. D70 entry level - just been
reduced to £780ish including the excellent !8-70mm lens (this lens would
be classed as an L class lens in Canon speak as it incorporates 3 ED
elements)

The D100/D200.

A New semi-pro camera.

Then the D1/D2 series.

Then what?

Deryck
  #2  
Old November 3rd 04, 06:36 PM
Lou
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:11:58 GMT, deryck lant
wrote:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos20d/

Phil is becoming sloppy with many errors and omissions.


He also chose to ignore many reported problems with the camera, many
pros don't trust it and many others have had all sorts of problems
that Canon seems to be ignoring.

Maybe a new item should be added to the reviews called reliability or
significant problems reported.

Oh, well - I will hang on to my very reliable D60.

Lou
  #3  
Old November 3rd 04, 06:36 PM
Lou
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:11:58 GMT, deryck lant
wrote:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos20d/

Phil is becoming sloppy with many errors and omissions.


He also chose to ignore many reported problems with the camera, many
pros don't trust it and many others have had all sorts of problems
that Canon seems to be ignoring.

Maybe a new item should be added to the reviews called reliability or
significant problems reported.

Oh, well - I will hang on to my very reliable D60.

Lou
  #4  
Old November 3rd 04, 07:15 PM
deryck lant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The message
from deryck lant contains these words:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos20d/


Phil is becoming sloppy with many errors and omissions.


I couldn't find the low-light AF focus test.


Or shot to shot time using single shot in Raw after the purposely
restricted 6 shot buffer.


The centre focus cross type sensor does operate with aperture f5.6
as well as f2.8. At F2.8 the sensor uses different elements giving 3
times the accuracy.


No mention of lens used in today's samples gallery. I didn't bother to
explore the EXIF data.


The review has now been amended adding lens used for samples.

Pity the shutter/mirror are so loud. It would have been an ideal camera
for use in available light work during live performances in theatre.


The response from Nikon will be fascinating. Trouble is a long time to
hang on for. Release at the PMA show but not available until later on year.


Nikon have promised 5 tiers of DSLR cameras. D70 entry level - just been
reduced to £780ish including the excellent !8-70mm lens (this lens would
be classed as an L class lens in Canon speak as it incorporates 3 ED
elements)


The D100/D200.


A New semi-pro camera.


Then the D1/D2 series.


Then what?


Deryck

  #5  
Old November 3rd 04, 07:15 PM
deryck lant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The message
from deryck lant contains these words:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos20d/


Phil is becoming sloppy with many errors and omissions.


I couldn't find the low-light AF focus test.


Or shot to shot time using single shot in Raw after the purposely
restricted 6 shot buffer.


The centre focus cross type sensor does operate with aperture f5.6
as well as f2.8. At F2.8 the sensor uses different elements giving 3
times the accuracy.


No mention of lens used in today's samples gallery. I didn't bother to
explore the EXIF data.


The review has now been amended adding lens used for samples.

Pity the shutter/mirror are so loud. It would have been an ideal camera
for use in available light work during live performances in theatre.


The response from Nikon will be fascinating. Trouble is a long time to
hang on for. Release at the PMA show but not available until later on year.


Nikon have promised 5 tiers of DSLR cameras. D70 entry level - just been
reduced to £780ish including the excellent !8-70mm lens (this lens would
be classed as an L class lens in Canon speak as it incorporates 3 ED
elements)


The D100/D200.


A New semi-pro camera.


Then the D1/D2 series.


Then what?


Deryck

  #6  
Old November 4th 04, 12:24 AM
The Naked Whiz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 18:36:52 GMT, Lou wrote:

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:11:58 GMT, deryck lant
wrote:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos20d/

Phil is becoming sloppy with many errors and omissions.


He also chose to ignore many reported problems with the camera, many
pros don't trust it and many others have had all sorts of problems
that Canon seems to be ignoring.

Maybe a new item should be added to the reviews called reliability or
significant problems reported.

Oh, well - I will hang on to my very reliable D60.

Lou


As he stated in his D30/D60/10D/20D forum, he did not experience any
of the problems, so he didn't report any of them. You can read all
about the problems in the forum if you need to.

Doug
  #7  
Old November 4th 04, 03:55 AM
Lou
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 00:24:02 GMT, The Naked Whiz
wrote:

As he stated in his D30/D60/10D/20D forum, he did not experience any
of the problems, so he didn't report any of them. You can read all
about the problems in the forum if you need to.


He must not read his own forums or any others. Canon may have sent
him a 20D that had been well checked out.

I would hope that any complete review would make mention of the
problems reported by the pros at least, they amount to more than a
smattering.

Lou
  #8  
Old November 4th 04, 05:20 AM
Skip M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Lou" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 00:24:02 GMT, The Naked Whiz
wrote:

As he stated in his D30/D60/10D/20D forum, he did not experience any
of the problems, so he didn't report any of them. You can read all
about the problems in the forum if you need to.


He must not read his own forums or any others. Canon may have sent
him a 20D that had been well checked out.

I would hope that any complete review would make mention of the
problems reported by the pros at least, they amount to more than a
smattering.

Lou


The review states that the firmware is 1.0.5, the latest firmware update, so
it would be expected that there would be no, or at least fewer, issues with
the camera.

--
Skip Middleton
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com


  #9  
Old November 4th 04, 05:20 AM
Skip M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Lou" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 00:24:02 GMT, The Naked Whiz
wrote:

As he stated in his D30/D60/10D/20D forum, he did not experience any
of the problems, so he didn't report any of them. You can read all
about the problems in the forum if you need to.


He must not read his own forums or any others. Canon may have sent
him a 20D that had been well checked out.

I would hope that any complete review would make mention of the
problems reported by the pros at least, they amount to more than a
smattering.

Lou


The review states that the firmware is 1.0.5, the latest firmware update, so
it would be expected that there would be no, or at least fewer, issues with
the camera.

--
Skip Middleton
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com


  #10  
Old November 4th 04, 08:14 AM
Ken Tough
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

deryck lant wrote:

Nikon have promised 5 tiers of DSLR cameras. D70 entry level - just been
reduced to £780ish including the excellent !8-70mm lens (this lens would
be classed as an L class lens in Canon speak as it incorporates 3 ED
elements)

The D100/D200.

A New semi-pro camera.

Then the D1/D2 series.

Then what?


Lenses? What's making me think heavily about going 20D instead
of D70 is the availability of a reasonable consumer mid-telephoto
with image stabilisation.

If Nikon comes out with an AF-S VR 70-200 DX f4.5-5.6, it'll
be the bomb.

--
Ken Tough
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quick Canon EOS 300D/ Digital Rebel Review Todd H. Digital Photography 0 September 21st 04 10:41 PM
Nanofilm Ultra Clarity on Canon lens Terry Digital Photography 11 August 27th 04 07:08 PM
Olympus E-1 Digital Clyde Torres Digital Photography 299 August 22nd 04 05:11 PM
Canon EOS D10 vs. Fuji S2: Opinions? David Sleeter Digital Photography 7 July 23rd 04 12:25 AM
Ultimate Stocked Canon Camera Bag (Lens Selection) - LIMIT 6-7 lenses please! Nick J 35mm Photo Equipment 9 June 26th 04 01:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.