A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » Large Format Photography Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Absolute beginner needs advivce



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old September 4th 04, 02:08 AM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Nicholas O. Lindan" wrote in message
ink.net...
"jjs" wrote

I've often wondered exactly why so many 4x5 press negatives look like
crap
and print horribly. I thought they boiled 'em in Dektol.


Well, ya know boss, its hard to keep things cool and like
copacetic in the trunk of a car ...

Yeah and the reticulation, the stop bath don't help that none.

Oh course you gota use stop bath.

Every one knows a copacetic darkroom has stop bath in the middle

Yeah boss, I'm going now, real quick [clatterclatterclatter slam]


Hey! Whadaya going to cover tanight, yer ass? Ya forgot flashbulbs! (mumble)
Deez boyz, I tell ya I'd hire monkeys... (mumble) Wherezat churchkey...


  #62  
Old September 4th 04, 02:12 AM
Frank Pittel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jjs wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" wrote in message
: ...

: Does anyone know why these press films got dropped?? It wasn't that long
: ago
: that digital displaced film amoung photojournalists.

: For B&W it was Tri-X, through and through with the exception of some fast
: films for special work.

I thought scarpitti is on record as stating that Tri-X can't be used with a
press camera. Only press films can be used with press cameras. I of course don't
believe it but that's scarpitti's claim and we all know that he's always right.

--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

  #63  
Old September 4th 04, 02:12 AM
Frank Pittel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jjs wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" wrote in message
: ...

: Does anyone know why these press films got dropped?? It wasn't that long
: ago
: that digital displaced film amoung photojournalists.

: For B&W it was Tri-X, through and through with the exception of some fast
: films for special work.

I thought scarpitti is on record as stating that Tri-X can't be used with a
press camera. Only press films can be used with press cameras. I of course don't
believe it but that's scarpitti's claim and we all know that he's always right.

--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

  #64  
Old September 4th 04, 02:15 AM
Frank Pittel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gregory Blank wrote:
: I might add I've never used that film, so whether its bull
: I can't comment. Since Frank P is probably reading this you
: all might enjoy one recent factoid I discovered Sensia is
: very Saturated, much more so than Provia,....tooo bad there's
: no 120 or 4x5 version.

Thanks. I just needed to hear about a film that I won't be able to use! :-(

: In article , "jjs"
: wrote:

: Well as pointed out earlier, Fuji has put the PRESS hype on one of their
: lines of film. It's all bull.

: --
: LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

: "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
: or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
: is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
: to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

  #65  
Old September 4th 04, 02:15 AM
Frank Pittel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gregory Blank wrote:
: I might add I've never used that film, so whether its bull
: I can't comment. Since Frank P is probably reading this you
: all might enjoy one recent factoid I discovered Sensia is
: very Saturated, much more so than Provia,....tooo bad there's
: no 120 or 4x5 version.

Thanks. I just needed to hear about a film that I won't be able to use! :-(

: In article , "jjs"
: wrote:

: Well as pointed out earlier, Fuji has put the PRESS hype on one of their
: lines of film. It's all bull.

: --
: LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

: "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
: or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
: is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
: to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

  #66  
Old September 4th 04, 02:24 AM
Frank Pittel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

PGG wrote:
: On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 09:51:40 -0500, Frank Pittel wrote:

: PGG wrote:
: : On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 08:47:16 -0500, jjs wrote:
:
: : "Michael Scarpitti" wrote in message
: : om...
: : Frank Pittel wrote in message
: : ...
: :
: : I would rather use a high quality modern film such as Tmax100 or Tmax400
: : others
: : might prefer Tri-x.
: :
: : Those are not PRESS FILMS. Press films had certain characteristics
: : that made them suitable for that kind of work. Tri-X Pan (ISO 400) is
: : similar to the typical press film of the past, but it's not available
: : in sheet film.
: :
: : What, exactly, is a PRESS FILM? Please spell it out.
:
: : My guess is its the stuff that goes into those Graflex holders. Holds 6
: : thin sheets in a single film pack so you can rapidly advance to the next
: : sheet. No?
:
: I've got some of those. You have to be careful and make sure the septums are
: flat or they can gouge your film like you wouldn't believe. Isn't that how the
: photographer that took the famous photos of the HindenburgSP? got as many
: shots as quickly as he did? Now that I think about how spontaneous it was I
: realize that those photographs weren't actually taken since according to
: scarpitti that type of spontaneous photography with an LF camera isn't possible.

: The problem with using LF nowadays, for spontaneous pictures such as
: candids, is the attention you receive. 50 years ago, seeing a guy take
: pictures with a Speed Graphic was probably commonplace. I don't know
: about you guys, but I can't shoot LF in a crowded area without getting
: people asking what that thing is and such.

I think we can start a long thread about the questions we've all been asked. I
just got back from a trip to the Rockies and the most common question I was
asked was if they could take a picture of my camera!!


--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

  #67  
Old September 4th 04, 02:24 AM
Frank Pittel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

PGG wrote:
: On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 09:51:40 -0500, Frank Pittel wrote:

: PGG wrote:
: : On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 08:47:16 -0500, jjs wrote:
:
: : "Michael Scarpitti" wrote in message
: : om...
: : Frank Pittel wrote in message
: : ...
: :
: : I would rather use a high quality modern film such as Tmax100 or Tmax400
: : others
: : might prefer Tri-x.
: :
: : Those are not PRESS FILMS. Press films had certain characteristics
: : that made them suitable for that kind of work. Tri-X Pan (ISO 400) is
: : similar to the typical press film of the past, but it's not available
: : in sheet film.
: :
: : What, exactly, is a PRESS FILM? Please spell it out.
:
: : My guess is its the stuff that goes into those Graflex holders. Holds 6
: : thin sheets in a single film pack so you can rapidly advance to the next
: : sheet. No?
:
: I've got some of those. You have to be careful and make sure the septums are
: flat or they can gouge your film like you wouldn't believe. Isn't that how the
: photographer that took the famous photos of the HindenburgSP? got as many
: shots as quickly as he did? Now that I think about how spontaneous it was I
: realize that those photographs weren't actually taken since according to
: scarpitti that type of spontaneous photography with an LF camera isn't possible.

: The problem with using LF nowadays, for spontaneous pictures such as
: candids, is the attention you receive. 50 years ago, seeing a guy take
: pictures with a Speed Graphic was probably commonplace. I don't know
: about you guys, but I can't shoot LF in a crowded area without getting
: people asking what that thing is and such.

I think we can start a long thread about the questions we've all been asked. I
just got back from a trip to the Rockies and the most common question I was
asked was if they could take a picture of my camera!!


--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

  #68  
Old September 4th 04, 02:24 AM
Frank Pittel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

PGG wrote:
: On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 09:51:40 -0500, Frank Pittel wrote:

: PGG wrote:
: : On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 08:47:16 -0500, jjs wrote:
:
: : "Michael Scarpitti" wrote in message
: : om...
: : Frank Pittel wrote in message
: : ...
: :
: : I would rather use a high quality modern film such as Tmax100 or Tmax400
: : others
: : might prefer Tri-x.
: :
: : Those are not PRESS FILMS. Press films had certain characteristics
: : that made them suitable for that kind of work. Tri-X Pan (ISO 400) is
: : similar to the typical press film of the past, but it's not available
: : in sheet film.
: :
: : What, exactly, is a PRESS FILM? Please spell it out.
:
: : My guess is its the stuff that goes into those Graflex holders. Holds 6
: : thin sheets in a single film pack so you can rapidly advance to the next
: : sheet. No?
:
: I've got some of those. You have to be careful and make sure the septums are
: flat or they can gouge your film like you wouldn't believe. Isn't that how the
: photographer that took the famous photos of the HindenburgSP? got as many
: shots as quickly as he did? Now that I think about how spontaneous it was I
: realize that those photographs weren't actually taken since according to
: scarpitti that type of spontaneous photography with an LF camera isn't possible.

: The problem with using LF nowadays, for spontaneous pictures such as
: candids, is the attention you receive. 50 years ago, seeing a guy take
: pictures with a Speed Graphic was probably commonplace. I don't know
: about you guys, but I can't shoot LF in a crowded area without getting
: people asking what that thing is and such.

I think we can start a long thread about the questions we've all been asked. I
just got back from a trip to the Rockies and the most common question I was
asked was if they could take a picture of my camera!!


--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

  #69  
Old September 4th 04, 01:39 PM
Shelley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm still trying to figure out why I need to use a "press" film with a
"press"
camera. Is there are reason why Tmax-100, Tmax-400 or even Tri-x wouldn't

work
with a "press" camera?


You can stop trying to figure it out. You don't need to use a press film in
your press camera, you can use any film you like as long as it's the right
size and is still being manufactured.

"Frank Pittel" wrote in message
...
jjs wrote:
: "Michael Scarpitti" wrote in message
: om...
: Frank Pittel wrote in message
: ...

: I would rather use a high quality modern film such as Tmax100 or

Tmax400
: others
: might prefer Tri-x.
:
: Those are not PRESS FILMS. Press films had certain characteristics
: that made them suitable for that kind of work. Tri-X Pan (ISO 400) is
: similar to the typical press film of the past, but it's not available
: in sheet film.

: What, exactly, is a PRESS FILM? Please spell it out.

I'm still trying to figure out why I need to use a "press" film with a

"press"
camera. Is there are reason why Tmax-100, Tmax-400 or even Tri-x wouldn't

work
with a "press" camera?

--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------



  #70  
Old September 4th 04, 01:39 PM
Shelley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm still trying to figure out why I need to use a "press" film with a
"press"
camera. Is there are reason why Tmax-100, Tmax-400 or even Tri-x wouldn't

work
with a "press" camera?


You can stop trying to figure it out. You don't need to use a press film in
your press camera, you can use any film you like as long as it's the right
size and is still being manufactured.

"Frank Pittel" wrote in message
...
jjs wrote:
: "Michael Scarpitti" wrote in message
: om...
: Frank Pittel wrote in message
: ...

: I would rather use a high quality modern film such as Tmax100 or

Tmax400
: others
: might prefer Tri-x.
:
: Those are not PRESS FILMS. Press films had certain characteristics
: that made them suitable for that kind of work. Tri-X Pan (ISO 400) is
: similar to the typical press film of the past, but it's not available
: in sheet film.

: What, exactly, is a PRESS FILM? Please spell it out.

I'm still trying to figure out why I need to use a "press" film with a

"press"
camera. Is there are reason why Tmax-100, Tmax-400 or even Tri-x wouldn't

work
with a "press" camera?

--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proud: Beginner at the Edinburgh Festival Craig Digital Photography 1 August 16th 04 06:56 PM
Book recommendation for a beginner Jerry In The Darkroom 3 June 3rd 04 03:05 AM
Mamiya 6 advice for MF beginner Gavin Medium Format Photography Equipment 8 February 2nd 04 06:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.