If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Leica M9 and/or R9D in the offing?
Leica will announce new things on 09.09.09 @ 0900 (EST).
An M9 to make up for the various deficiencies of the M8? A new R9? (R9-II? R9D?) IAC, full frame, I bet (although 1.3x ain't too bad...) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Leica M9 and/or R9D in the offing?
Alan Browne wrote:
Leica will announce new things on 09.09.09 @ 0900 (EST). An M9 to make up for the various deficiencies of the M8? A new R9? (R9-II? R9D?) IAC, full frame, I bet (although 1.3x ain't too bad...) It's apparently an M9. IIRC Leica have abandoned the R line. The M9 might make up for the various technical faults in the M8, but can't overcome the fundamental deficiency - it's an anachronistic design bettered by modern designs costing a fraction of the price. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Leica M9 and/or R9D in the offing?
Me wrote:
Alan Browne wrote: Leica will announce new things on 09.09.09 @ 0900 (EST). An M9 to make up for the various deficiencies of the M8? A new R9? (R9-II? R9D?) IAC, full frame, I bet (although 1.3x ain't too bad...) It's apparently an M9. IIRC Leica have abandoned the R line. The M9 might make up for the various technical faults in the M8, but can't overcome the fundamental deficiency - it's an anachronistic design bettered by modern designs costing a fraction of the price. What's that got to do with marketing to deep pockets? Still remains that the M8, sans AA filter and at a 1.3x crop behind Leica glass takes exceptionally detailed images. I'm not sure if the M8 and M8.2 incorporate the same moire-detection/removal algorithms of the S2 - but the M9 (if that's what it is) logically would do so. As I said above, this M9 would likely be FF. Perhaps incorporate anti-shake (a la Minolta/Sony). I have no idea what kind of installed base of R8/9's are out there with their associated lenses - could be enough to justify a new body, perhaps. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Leica M9 and/or R9D in the offing?
Alan Browne wrote:
Me wrote: Alan Browne wrote: Leica will announce new things on 09.09.09 @ 0900 (EST). An M9 to make up for the various deficiencies of the M8? A new R9? (R9-II? R9D?) IAC, full frame, I bet (although 1.3x ain't too bad...) It's apparently an M9. IIRC Leica have abandoned the R line. The M9 might make up for the various technical faults in the M8, but can't overcome the fundamental deficiency - it's an anachronistic design bettered by modern designs costing a fraction of the price. What's that got to do with marketing to deep pockets? Still remains that the M8, sans AA filter and at a 1.3x crop behind Leica glass takes exceptionally detailed images. Marketing what by any rational analysis hugely overpriced products to the well-heeled doesn't change the facts. The M Leicas are like M class Mercedes. The M Class Mercedes has an excuse - it was made in the USA. I'm not sure if the M8 and M8.2 incorporate the same moire-detection/removal algorithms of the S2 - but the M9 (if that's what it is) logically would do so. As I said above, this M9 would likely be FF. Perhaps incorporate anti-shake (a la Minolta/Sony). It's rumoured to be Fx, 18mp. I have no idea what kind of installed base of R8/9's are out there with their associated lenses - could be enough to justify a new body, perhaps. I've never seen one in the flesh, so I only rely on evidence from others that the R Leicas even exist. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Leica M9 and/or R9D in the offing?
Me wrote:
Alan Browne wrote: Me wrote: Alan Browne wrote: Leica will announce new things on 09.09.09 @ 0900 (EST). An M9 to make up for the various deficiencies of the M8? A new R9? (R9-II? R9D?) IAC, full frame, I bet (although 1.3x ain't too bad...) It's apparently an M9. IIRC Leica have abandoned the R line. The M9 might make up for the various technical faults in the M8, but can't overcome the fundamental deficiency - it's an anachronistic design bettered by modern designs costing a fraction of the price. What's that got to do with marketing to deep pockets? Still remains that the M8, sans AA filter and at a 1.3x crop behind Leica glass takes exceptionally detailed images. Marketing what by any rational analysis hugely overpriced products to the well-heeled doesn't change the facts. The M Leicas are like M class Mercedes. The M Class Mercedes has an excuse - it was made in the USA. Poor analogy. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Leica M9 and/or R9D in the offing?
Alan Browne wrote:
Me wrote: Alan Browne wrote: Me wrote: Alan Browne wrote: Leica will announce new things on 09.09.09 @ 0900 (EST). An M9 to make up for the various deficiencies of the M8? A new R9? (R9-II? R9D?) IAC, full frame, I bet (although 1.3x ain't too bad...) It's apparently an M9. IIRC Leica have abandoned the R line. The M9 might make up for the various technical faults in the M8, but can't overcome the fundamental deficiency - it's an anachronistic design bettered by modern designs costing a fraction of the price. What's that got to do with marketing to deep pockets? Still remains that the M8, sans AA filter and at a 1.3x crop behind Leica glass takes exceptionally detailed images. Marketing what by any rational analysis hugely overpriced products to the well-heeled doesn't change the facts. The M Leicas are like M class Mercedes. The M Class Mercedes has an excuse - it was made in the USA. Poor analogy. Probably just an exaggeration. At least there's a chance an M9 might do what it's supposed to do - take photos. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Leica M9 and/or R9D in the offing?
Alan Browne writes:
I'm not sure if the M8 and M8.2 incorporate the same moire-detection/removal algorithms of the S2 - but the M9 (if that's what it is) logically would do so. I've seen complaints that their "moire-detection/removal" algorithms don't really work all that well... [as I mentioned in another post, that isn't really surprising, given that the information is gone by the time the algorithms get it] -Miles -- Future, n. That period of time in which our affairs prosper, our friends are true and our happiness is assured. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Leica M9 and/or R9D in the offing?
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Leica will announce new things on 09.09.09 @ 0900 (EST). An M9 to make up for the various deficiencies of the M8? A new R9? (R9-II? R9D?) IAC, full frame, I bet (although 1.3x ain't too bad...) There's a rumor floating around about two new Leica cameras, an M9 that a FF 18M rangefinder, and something called the X1 that appears to be a smaller cam with an APS-C sensor. See link below, believe at your own risk. http://gizmodo.com/5350721/is-this-t...rious-leica-x1 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Leica M9 and/or R9D in the offing?
"Bowser" wrote in message
. com... "Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Leica will announce new things on 09.09.09 @ 0900 (EST). An M9 to make up for the various deficiencies of the M8? A new R9? (R9-II? R9D?) IAC, full frame, I bet (although 1.3x ain't too bad...) There's a rumor floating around about two new Leica cameras, an M9 that a FF 18M rangefinder, and something called the X1 that appears to be a smaller cam with an APS-C sensor. See link below, believe at your own risk. http://gizmodo.com/5350721/is-this-t...rious-leica-x1 Yeah, another rumour here too saying 18MP, full frame: http://www.photographybay.com/2009/09/06/leica-m9/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Leica M9 and/or R9D in the offing?
Bruce wrote:
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:39:51 +0100, "EMG" wrote: "Bowser" wrote: There's a rumor floating around about two new Leica cameras, an M9 that a FF 18M rangefinder, and something called the X1 that appears to be a smaller cam with an APS-C sensor. See link below, believe at your own risk. http://gizmodo.com/5350721/is-this-t...rious-leica-x1 Yeah, another rumour here too saying 18MP, full frame: http://www.photographybay.com/2009/09/06/leica-m9/ That's about as accurate a "rumour" as you will find. The M9 is here! There is a proper infra-red filter over the sensor so no need to use the annoying "hot mirror" filters on your lenses. There is no anti-alias filter so Leica M9 users will obtain more detail from their M9 than any other digital camera with 18 MP, at the expense of a slight risk of moire fringing, as with the M8. "Any other digital camera" includes digital cameras with much higher pixel counts than the M9, even excluding scanning back types, so I doubt what you say is true. Leica has chosen to remain with a CCD sensor to maintain the colour fidelity which was one of the strongest features of the M8. Is there one shred of evidence to say that the colour fidelity of CCDs is better than CMOS?. If the colour fidelity of CCDs was a reason to use one in the design of the M8, then how come they missed the big issue with the IR filter, until they got slammed by users complaining? There won't be a new Leica R body, not ever. Leica publicly announced some months ago that development and manufacture of the R Series had ended. Future Leica DSLRs will be in the S series. The S2 will soon be available, offering 37.5 MP from its 30mm x 45mm CCD sensor. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What is best (non-Leica) digital slr back for Leica R lenses? | TJ[_2_] | Digital Photography | 13 | December 23rd 07 10:46 PM |
What is best (non-Leica) digital slr back for Leica R lenses? | TJ[_2_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 12 | December 23rd 07 10:46 PM |
Ebay for x-mas, Leica M2, Lecia R3, five leica lenses | Eddie | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | December 14th 05 05:25 AM |
When to buy - Huge discounts in the offing? | Siddhartha Jain | Digital Photography | 14 | October 3rd 04 04:56 AM |
FS: Leica Adapter to Use Nikkor SLR Lenses on your M Series Leica | Don Whipple | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | September 24th 03 04:05 AM |