If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax K20D or Canon 40D or Canon XSI
"Focus" wrote in message
... "David J Taylor" wrote in message ... Focus wrote: "David J Taylor" [] I got the D40 as I don't really need more than 6MP for my work. Very good for the money indeed. I had it before the D40x and now the D300. Considering the little difference in money I would now go for the D60. The MP difference is pretty big and if not for printing, it still gives advantage for cropping and sharper pics. I would get it with the 18-135; it gives just enough zoom to keep going for some time without having to get an new lens. The picture quality is one of the best in it's price range. Even better then the more expensive 18-70. I tend to take quite a lot of telephoto shots, and I find the in-viewfinder stabilisation from the VR lenses a great help (particularly at 300mm), so VR is almost a "must" when I get lenses. But you are right - the 18-135mm is a good general purpose lens, and there is a VR offering at 18-200mm for those who want just a single lens with VR. Sure. At focal lenghts longer than 135 I'd want/need VR too. Until that, I got some VR in my body ;-|) I was a sharp shooter for a few years with revolver and pistol. The techniques I learned for breathing, standing, etc. still help me get sharp shots at up to 1/10 sec. without VR. Examples? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax K20D or Canon 40D or Canon XSI
"OldBoy" wrote in message .. . "Focus" wrote in message ... "David J Taylor" wrote in message ... Focus wrote: "David J Taylor" [] I got the D40 as I don't really need more than 6MP for my work. Very good for the money indeed. I had it before the D40x and now the D300. Considering the little difference in money I would now go for the D60. The MP difference is pretty big and if not for printing, it still gives advantage for cropping and sharper pics. I would get it with the 18-135; it gives just enough zoom to keep going for some time without having to get an new lens. The picture quality is one of the best in it's price range. Even better then the more expensive 18-70. I tend to take quite a lot of telephoto shots, and I find the in-viewfinder stabilisation from the VR lenses a great help (particularly at 300mm), so VR is almost a "must" when I get lenses. But you are right - the 18-135mm is a good general purpose lens, and there is a VR offering at 18-200mm for those who want just a single lens with VR. Sure. At focal lenghts longer than 135 I'd want/need VR too. Until that, I got some VR in my body ;-|) I was a sharp shooter for a few years with revolver and pistol. The techniques I learned for breathing, standing, etc. still help me get sharp shots at up to 1/10 sec. without VR. Examples? No they were all killed... O, you mean the pictures? See new postings.. -- Focus |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Pentax K20D 21 fps?? | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 18 | February 29th 08 11:23 PM |
Pop Photography now telling what rez LCDs really are? Review K20D | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 2 | February 16th 08 09:51 PM |
Pentax K20D | Tony Polson | Digital SLR Cameras | 23 | January 30th 08 07:37 AM |
Pentax K20d sensor | frederick | Digital SLR Cameras | 2 | January 23rd 08 10:31 PM |