A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » Medium Format Photography Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sad news for film-based photography



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old September 24th 04, 05:42 AM
Ted Azito
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As long as the market is there and is demanding the quality product,
someone will make said product. Personally I hope Kodak dies. Its
complete death will be a big boost for small specialist firms, and
they may acquire its technical assets at reasonable prices. It's
obvious that it has been suffering from corporate Alzheimer's for a
decade at least.

Meanwhile on the digital front, digital cameras will become
commoditized like PCs, there will be no margin, and it will settle
down to one or two big players and some niche companies.
  #102  
Old September 24th 04, 05:42 AM
Ted Azito
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As long as the market is there and is demanding the quality product,
someone will make said product. Personally I hope Kodak dies. Its
complete death will be a big boost for small specialist firms, and
they may acquire its technical assets at reasonable prices. It's
obvious that it has been suffering from corporate Alzheimer's for a
decade at least.

Meanwhile on the digital front, digital cameras will become
commoditized like PCs, there will be no margin, and it will settle
down to one or two big players and some niche companies.
  #103  
Old September 24th 04, 07:48 AM
Gregory Blank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Be careful what you wish for the transition could be painful.


In article ,
(Ted Azito) wrote:

As long as the market is there and is demanding the quality product,
someone will make said product. Personally I hope Kodak dies. Its
complete death will be a big boost for small specialist firms, and
they may acquire its technical assets at reasonable prices. It's
obvious that it has been suffering from corporate Alzheimer's for a
decade at least.

Meanwhile on the digital front, digital cameras will become
commoditized like PCs, there will be no margin, and it will settle
down to one or two big players and some niche companies.


--
LF Website @
http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
  #104  
Old September 24th 04, 07:48 AM
Gregory Blank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Be careful what you wish for the transition could be painful.


In article ,
(Ted Azito) wrote:

As long as the market is there and is demanding the quality product,
someone will make said product. Personally I hope Kodak dies. Its
complete death will be a big boost for small specialist firms, and
they may acquire its technical assets at reasonable prices. It's
obvious that it has been suffering from corporate Alzheimer's for a
decade at least.

Meanwhile on the digital front, digital cameras will become
commoditized like PCs, there will be no margin, and it will settle
down to one or two big players and some niche companies.


--
LF Website @
http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
  #105  
Old September 24th 04, 08:24 AM
John Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"jjs" wrote in message ...
"Böwzér" wrote in message
...
This is total BS...


The best archival storage does not have the liability of requiring
electricity to keep it alive and lasts a couple hundred years. Figure it
out. I'll count to three. One....Two... (GET IT YET?)


To quote a wise man (with slight rephrasing)

"Real men don't take backups, they just upload them to a ftp server
and let the world mirror it" ;-)
  #106  
Old September 24th 04, 08:24 AM
John Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"jjs" wrote in message ...
"Böwzér" wrote in message
...
This is total BS...


The best archival storage does not have the liability of requiring
electricity to keep it alive and lasts a couple hundred years. Figure it
out. I'll count to three. One....Two... (GET IT YET?)


To quote a wise man (with slight rephrasing)

"Real men don't take backups, they just upload them to a ftp server
and let the world mirror it" ;-)
  #107  
Old September 24th 04, 12:52 PM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Neil Gould" wrote in message
k.net...

A Zeiss Ikonophone? ;-)


Prophetic. I love the name. Postage-stamp sized pictures, i(c)on. Perfect.


  #108  
Old September 24th 04, 12:52 PM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Neil Gould" wrote in message
k.net...

A Zeiss Ikonophone? ;-)


Prophetic. I love the name. Postage-stamp sized pictures, i(c)on. Perfect.


  #109  
Old September 24th 04, 05:21 PM
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ted Azito wrote:

As long as the market is there and is demanding the quality product,
someone will make said product. Personally I hope Kodak dies. Its
complete death will be a big boost for small specialist firms, and
they may acquire its technical assets at reasonable prices. It's
obvious that it has been suffering from corporate Alzheimer's for a
decade at least.


Stupidist post I've read in weeks. Maybe we need an award.


--
-- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource:
-- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--
  #110  
Old September 24th 04, 05:21 PM
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ted Azito wrote:

As long as the market is there and is demanding the quality product,
someone will make said product. Personally I hope Kodak dies. Its
complete death will be a big boost for small specialist firms, and
they may acquire its technical assets at reasonable prices. It's
obvious that it has been suffering from corporate Alzheimer's for a
decade at least.


Stupidist post I've read in weeks. Maybe we need an award.


--
-- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource:
-- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sad news for film-based photography Ronald Shu 35mm Photo Equipment 200 October 6th 04 12:07 AM
Digital Imaging vs. (Digital and Film) Photography Bob Monaghan Medium Format Photography Equipment 9 June 19th 04 05:48 PM
Books on Composition, developing an "Eye"? William J. Slater General Photography Techniques 9 April 7th 04 04:22 PM
Fuji S2 and Metz 44 Mz-2 Flash elchief In The Darkroom 3 April 7th 04 10:20 AM
Fuji S2 and Metz 44 Mz-2 Flash elchief Photographing People 3 April 7th 04 10:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.