If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Steve Young wrote:
Dittos! My wish too, but I won't compromise on conforming the affected groups charters. The only reply I will have for this apparent 'hit and run' pillage is my resolve to vote 'no'. You are being very unreasonable. You are asking for something for which there is no process. -- Thaddeus Lip****z |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Steve Young wrote:
Dittos! My wish too, but I won't compromise on conforming the affected groups charters. The only reply I will have for this apparent 'hit and run' pillage is my resolve to vote 'no'. You are being very unreasonable. You are asking for something for which there is no process. -- Thaddeus Lip****z |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
"Alan Browne" wrote
Steve Young wrote: "Alan Browne" wrote Steve Young wrote: Will this be addressing new charters for the 2 original groups (rpd & rpe35mm) which are impacted by the new group(s)? no. why? you have no problem pillaging the groups? no new charters as your gratitude? You're the one who wants this done, you lead it. It takes unity to make it work. I now view your new group as the elitist power grab others have called you on. You might as well petition for a moderated group. Steve Young |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
"Alan Browne" wrote
Steve Young wrote: "Alan Browne" wrote Steve Young wrote: Will this be addressing new charters for the 2 original groups (rpd & rpe35mm) which are impacted by the new group(s)? no. why? you have no problem pillaging the groups? no new charters as your gratitude? You're the one who wants this done, you lead it. It takes unity to make it work. I now view your new group as the elitist power grab others have called you on. You might as well petition for a moderated group. Steve Young |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"Thad" wrote
Steve Young wrote: Dittos! My wish too, but I won't compromise on conforming the affected groups charters. The only reply I will have for this apparent 'hit and run' pillage is my resolve to vote 'no'. You are being very unreasonable. You are asking for something for which there is no process. In spite of the hundreds of posts, and even Alan saying it was needed, neither of you have been apparently willing to ask (and accommodate), if it could be included with your proposal. It sure makes a lot of sense, especially when you're going to be asking the 2 affected groups to 'vote in' your new group. x |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
"Thad" wrote
Steve Young wrote: Dittos! My wish too, but I won't compromise on conforming the affected groups charters. The only reply I will have for this apparent 'hit and run' pillage is my resolve to vote 'no'. You are being very unreasonable. You are asking for something for which there is no process. In spite of the hundreds of posts, and even Alan saying it was needed, neither of you have been apparently willing to ask (and accommodate), if it could be included with your proposal. It sure makes a lot of sense, especially when you're going to be asking the 2 affected groups to 'vote in' your new group. x |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"Thad" wrote
Steve Young wrote: Dittos! My wish too, but I won't compromise on conforming the affected groups charters. The only reply I will have for this apparent 'hit and run' pillage is my resolve to vote 'no'. You are being very unreasonable. You are asking for something for which there is no process. In spite of the hundreds of posts, and even Alan saying it was needed, neither of you have been apparently willing to ask (and accommodate), if it could be included with your proposal. It sure makes a lot of sense, especially when you're going to be asking the 2 affected groups to 'vote in' your new group. x |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Kibo informs me that Alan Browne
stated that: Lionel wrote: Does the E20 have a mirror that routes the image from the lens between the image plane & the viewfinder? - If so, all it's an SLR, according to all the photography textbooks on my bookshelf, & having a digital imaging sensor makes it a DSLR, & on-topic in RPDS by any rational measure, IMO. Your opinion is wrong. ...interchangeable lenses: NO You can't twist and turn your words to make it something it is not. Hello? - You're the one twisting words. Here's a *standard definition* of the term 'SLR': "The Manual of Photography - Eighth Edition", Jacobson, Ray & Attridge, ISBN 0240-512268-5, page 87: -------------- Single-lens reflex cameras. [...] The principle of the camera is illustrated in Figure 8.6. A plane front-surface mirror at 45 degrees to the optical axis is used to form the image from the camera lens on a screen where it may be focused and composed.For exposure, the mirror is lifted out of the way before the camera shutter operates. Immediately the the exposure is completed, the mirror the mirror returns to the viewing position. -------------- The rest of the section goes on to describe the mechanisms in more detail, & the history of SLRs. *Nowhere in the chapter* does it say that an SLR requires an interchangable lens mount. All my other photography text books describe SLRs in much the same way, & not one of them includes anything about a requirement for interchangeable lenses in their description, despite the fact that most of them /do/ mention that one of the advantages of SLRs is that they generally have a wide variety of different lens types available for them. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Kibo informs me that Alan Browne
stated that: Lionel wrote: Does the E20 have a mirror that routes the image from the lens between the image plane & the viewfinder? - If so, all it's an SLR, according to all the photography textbooks on my bookshelf, & having a digital imaging sensor makes it a DSLR, & on-topic in RPDS by any rational measure, IMO. Your opinion is wrong. ...interchangeable lenses: NO You can't twist and turn your words to make it something it is not. Hello? - You're the one twisting words. Here's a *standard definition* of the term 'SLR': "The Manual of Photography - Eighth Edition", Jacobson, Ray & Attridge, ISBN 0240-512268-5, page 87: -------------- Single-lens reflex cameras. [...] The principle of the camera is illustrated in Figure 8.6. A plane front-surface mirror at 45 degrees to the optical axis is used to form the image from the camera lens on a screen where it may be focused and composed.For exposure, the mirror is lifted out of the way before the camera shutter operates. Immediately the the exposure is completed, the mirror the mirror returns to the viewing position. -------------- The rest of the section goes on to describe the mechanisms in more detail, & the history of SLRs. *Nowhere in the chapter* does it say that an SLR requires an interchangable lens mount. All my other photography text books describe SLRs in much the same way, & not one of them includes anything about a requirement for interchangeable lenses in their description, despite the fact that most of them /do/ mention that one of the advantages of SLRs is that they generally have a wide variety of different lens types available for them. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Kibo informs me that Alan Browne
stated that: Lionel wrote: Does the E20 have a mirror that routes the image from the lens between the image plane & the viewfinder? - If so, all it's an SLR, according to all the photography textbooks on my bookshelf, & having a digital imaging sensor makes it a DSLR, & on-topic in RPDS by any rational measure, IMO. Your opinion is wrong. ...interchangeable lenses: NO You can't twist and turn your words to make it something it is not. Hello? - You're the one twisting words. Here's a *standard definition* of the term 'SLR': "The Manual of Photography - Eighth Edition", Jacobson, Ray & Attridge, ISBN 0240-512268-5, page 87: -------------- Single-lens reflex cameras. [...] The principle of the camera is illustrated in Figure 8.6. A plane front-surface mirror at 45 degrees to the optical axis is used to form the image from the camera lens on a screen where it may be focused and composed.For exposure, the mirror is lifted out of the way before the camera shutter operates. Immediately the the exposure is completed, the mirror the mirror returns to the viewing position. -------------- The rest of the section goes on to describe the mechanisms in more detail, & the history of SLRs. *Nowhere in the chapter* does it say that an SLR requires an interchangable lens mount. All my other photography text books describe SLRs in much the same way, & not one of them includes anything about a requirement for interchangeable lenses in their description, despite the fact that most of them /do/ mention that one of the advantages of SLRs is that they generally have a wide variety of different lens types available for them. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|