Does any other program (windows or linux) do screenshot annotationefficiently?

On Sat, 4 May 2013 12:55:08 +0200, Poutnik
wrote:


Eric Stevens posted Sat, 04 May 2013 22:36:57 +1200


eternal-september.org
dotsrc.org
ccountrynet especially this one
individual.net
easynews.com
anonymous

I have individual.net in my path.

... and I have easynews.com in mine. So too do a number of other
regular subscribers.

So do I use eternal-september.org

All that is similar nonsense
like arresting all people
with blue eyes,
brown trousers
or sport shoes,

if I was robbed by guys when
some had blue eyes,
some brown trousers
and some sport shoes.

sarcasm:
Especially the sport shoes are important
as most robbers are wearing sport shoes.

If you see anybody jogging in sport shoes,
call the police immediately.

I've got dotsrc in my path. What's going on!!!

--
p-0.0-h the cat

Attention new posters. Bewa ACF is under attack by a small number of
trolls who post false and misleading replies to questions here, and run
campaigns of lies against some of the long term regulars in order to get
them killfiled.

These are my recommendations to filter their malicious trollspam

By filtering out messages containing
q34wsk20-at-yahoo.com AND AND
in the "From:" header and messages containing "ccountrynet" in the path statement
you will knock out more than half or even three quarters of the trollspamming in
this group.

I also recommend filtering all crossposts, anonymous remailers, and any
posts with these providers in the path:

eternal-september.org
dotsrc.org
ccountrynet especially this one
individual.net
easynews.com
anonymous

On Sat, 04 May 2013 12:10:36 +0100, "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"
wrote:

I've got dotsrc in my path. What's going on!!!

I believe the new rave is to block by address rather than by
content. Get with it, Pooh !!!!! You'll never get that sexy kitten if
you act old..
I'm modern, I block myself ......

[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On Sat, 04 May 2013 08:32:24 -0300, Shadow wrote:

On Sat, 04 May 2013 12:10:36 +0100, "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"
wrote:

I've got dotsrc in my path. What's going on!!!

I believe the new rave is to block by address rather than by
content. Get with it, Pooh !!!!! You'll never get that sexy kitten if
you act old..
I'm modern, I block myself ......

I stick pins in effigies of myself. It really helps.

--
p-0.0-h the cat

Attention new posters. Bewa ACF is under attack by a small number of
trolls who post false and misleading replies to questions here, and run
campaigns of lies against some of the long term regulars in order to get
them killfiled.

These are my recommendations to filter their malicious trollspam

By filtering out messages containing
q34wsk20-at-yahoo.com AND AND
in the "From:" header and messages containing "ccountrynet" in the path statement
you will knock out more than half or even three quarters of the trollspamming in
this group.

I also recommend filtering all crossposts, anonymous remailers, and any
posts with these providers in the path:

eternal-september.org
dotsrc.org
ccountrynet especially this one
individual.net
easynews.com
anonymous

| That's a cute little phone, but - try as I might - I can't see what
| I'd do with it. Searching my memory, I can't think of a single
| instance in recent months where I would have liked to have a smart
| phone.
|
| So you do carry a dedicated navigation system with you all
| the time, and never had the need to kill time waiting by e.g.
| browsing news or photos, nor ever had to look up a number, an
| address or a description of a thing or procedure or find a
| doctor or usable eating place while outside town?
|

I was on the Boston subway yesterday, watching perhaps
1/2 the people diddle their tech. In general it seemed to be
one of two things: listening to music with earplugs or checking
Facebook over and over. It's what young mothers refer to as
a "pacifier" -- something to suck on in order to dull anxiety in
an undisciplined mind. Unfortunately, a toddler (of any age)
with a very entertaining, multi-media pacifier is going to have
a very hard time getting weaned off of it. One becomes a slave
to diddling, unconsciously convinced that mere boredom is a
dangerous bogieman that must be avoided, lest one suffer
some dire but undefined fate.

I'm not anti-tech. I write software and do web design on
the side. And I'm not against cellphones. I have a Tracphone
in case I need to make a call. On the other hand,
I have maps in my truck and a small notebook when I need
to write things down. I read news online and in a newspaper.
I don't need to have the latest "breaking news" while I'm
waiting at a red light or sitting in a dentist's waiting room.
And I certainly don't need to spend upward of $100/month
for that.

If one actually relates to here and now, it turns out that it
doesn't particularly require chocolate sauce and sprinkles. One
doesn't actually need to find a device to kill the time just
because the mobile over one's crib has stopped spinning.

Funny how people try so hard to "kill time" or "pass the time"
.....whenever we're not busy frantically worried about not having
enough time.

In article , Mayayana
wrote:

I was on the Boston subway yesterday, watching perhaps
1/2 the people diddle their tech. In general it seemed to be
one of two things: listening to music with earplugs or checking
Facebook over and over.

you must have done a *lot* more than just watch them to know
specifically what they were doing on their phones.

the only way to know they were 'checking facebook over and over' would
be by looking over their shoulder directly at their phone. not only is
that rude but it's downright creepy.

It's what young mothers refer to as
a "pacifier" -- something to suck on in order to dull anxiety in
an undisciplined mind. Unfortunately, a toddler (of any age)
with a very entertaining, multi-media pacifier is going to have
a very hard time getting weaned off of it. One becomes a slave
to diddling, unconsciously convinced that mere boredom is a
dangerous bogieman that must be avoided, lest one suffer
some dire but undefined fate.

nonsense.

I'm not anti-tech.

yes you are, but a more appropriate description is you're anti-progress.

I write software and do web design on
the side.

for legacy hardware and legacy operating systems.

you aren't writing apps for mobile devices. that much is clear.

And I'm not against cellphones. I have a Tracphone
in case I need to make a call.

i don't think you realize just how funny that is.

On the other hand,
I have maps in my truck and a small notebook when I need
to write things down.

paper maps are not as up to date and much harder to use while driving.

or are you one of those idiots who unfolds a map while trying to steer?

I read news online and in a newspaper.
I don't need to have the latest "breaking news" while I'm
waiting at a red light or sitting in a dentist's waiting room.
And I certainly don't need to spend upward of $100/month
for that.

there's no need to spend $100/mo.

you are so full of misinformation, it's crazy.

If one actually relates to here and now, it turns out that it
doesn't particularly require chocolate sauce and sprinkles. One
doesn't actually need to find a device to kill the time just
because the mobile over one's crib has stopped spinning.

Funny how people try so hard to "kill time" or "pass the time"
....whenever we're not busy frantically worried about not having
enough time.

who are you to say how someone else spends their time?

On Sat, 4 May 2013 09:29:26 -0400, "Mayayana"
wrote:

I was on the Boston subway yesterday, watching perhaps
1/2 the people diddle their tech. In general it seemed to be
one of two things: listening to music with earplugs or checking
Facebook over and over. It's what young mothers refer to as
a "pacifier" -- something to suck on in order to dull anxiety in
an undisciplined mind. Unfortunately, a toddler (of any age)
with a very entertaining, multi-media pacifier is going to have
a very hard time getting weaned off of it. One becomes a slave
to diddling, unconsciously convinced that mere boredom is a
dangerous bogieman that must be avoided, lest one suffer
some dire but undefined fate.

I'm not anti-tech. I write software and do web design on
the side. And I'm not against cellphones. I have a Tracphone
in case I need to make a call. On the other hand,
I have maps in my truck and a small notebook when I need
to write things down. I read news online and in a newspaper.
I don't need to have the latest "breaking news" while I'm
waiting at a red light or sitting in a dentist's waiting room.
And I certainly don't need to spend upward of $100/month
for that.

If one actually relates to here and now, it turns out that it
doesn't particularly require chocolate sauce and sprinkles. One
doesn't actually need to find a device to kill the time just
because the mobile over one's crib has stopped spinning.

Funny how people try so hard to "kill time" or "pass the time"
....whenever we're not busy frantically worried about not having
enough time.


You must be old. I am, so I agree with this post.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

| you must have done a *lot* more than just watch them to know
| specifically what they were doing on their phones.
|
| the only way to know they were 'checking facebook over and over' would
| be by looking over their shoulder directly at their phone.

No. I could easily see everyone around me. I'm not
sure if it was Facebook. I wasn't close enough to
read, but I could see that nearly everyone was
scrolling through a similar list of rectangles with icons
on the left and small amounts of text. I'm guessing
that was probably their Facebook "wall".

| Funny how people try so hard to "kill time" or "pass the time"
| ....whenever we're not busy frantically worried about not having
| enough time.
|
| You must be old. I am, so I agree with this post.

I'm 57. I know lots of older people who are addicted
to smartphones. (And of course there's Wolfgang.)
But I know what you mean. Younger people have grown
up with cellphones and texting, and younger people
like as much peer feedback as possible. It must be
very hard to resist being in constant contact with
one's buddies. But I worry about them. They have almost
no experience of actual solitude, or formless time, or
self-reliance. Their world is an abstraction, more wired
than physical. One can see it walking down city streets.
People seem to be getting more rude and inconsiderate,
but I don't think that's actually what's happening.
Rather, cellphone addicts are radically separated from
their own physical environment. They're not where they
are, and actually don't regard their physical location as
relevant. ...At least not until they get hit by a truck. I
have a blind friend who complains that in recent years
he's had an increasing problem with people walking into
him. And it's not just hitting his elbow as they walk by. It's
full-speed, head-on collision.

On 5/4/2013 12:31 PM, Mayayana wrote:
| Funny how people try so hard to "kill time" or "pass the time"
| ....whenever we're not busy frantically worried about not having
| enough time.
|
| You must be old. I am, so I agree with this post.

I'm 57. I know lots of older people who are addicted
to smartphones. (And of course there's Wolfgang.)
But I know what you mean. Younger people have grown
up with cellphones and texting, and younger people
like as much peer feedback as possible. It must be
very hard to resist being in constant contact with
one's buddies. But I worry about them. They have almost
no experience of actual solitude, or formless time, or
self-reliance. Their world is an abstraction, more wired
than physical. One can see it walking down city streets.
People seem to be getting more rude and inconsiderate,
but I don't think that's actually what's happening.
Rather, cellphone addicts are radically separated from
their own physical environment. They're not where they
are, and actually don't regard their physical location as
relevant. ...At least not until they get hit by a truck. I
have a blind friend who complains that in recent years
he's had an increasing problem with people walking into
him. And it's not just hitting his elbow as they walk by. It's
full-speed, head-on collision.


We are starting to see a backlash against that:
Quiet cars in the commuter trains; people telling the loud chatters to
shut up. I and many others, have zero interest in the details of
somebody's latest affair.
Evn though I am semi-retired, I like to use my quiet time to wind down.
Though I freely admit, that I will look at my images, to see how I may
improve them, during "down time."



--
PeterN

On Sat, 04 May 2013 11:26:41 -0300, Shadow wrote:

On Sat, 4 May 2013 09:29:26 -0400, "Mayayana"
wrote:

I was on the Boston subway yesterday, watching perhaps
1/2 the people diddle their tech. In general it seemed to be
one of two things: listening to music with earplugs or checking
Facebook over and over. It's what young mothers refer to as
a "pacifier" -- something to suck on in order to dull anxiety in
an undisciplined mind. Unfortunately, a toddler (of any age)
with a very entertaining, multi-media pacifier is going to have
a very hard time getting weaned off of it. One becomes a slave
to diddling, unconsciously convinced that mere boredom is a
dangerous bogieman that must be avoided, lest one suffer
some dire but undefined fate.

I'm not anti-tech. I write software and do web design on
the side. And I'm not against cellphones. I have a Tracphone
in case I need to make a call. On the other hand,
I have maps in my truck and a small notebook when I need
to write things down. I read news online and in a newspaper.
I don't need to have the latest "breaking news" while I'm
waiting at a red light or sitting in a dentist's waiting room.
And I certainly don't need to spend upward of $100/month
for that.

If one actually relates to here and now, it turns out that it
doesn't particularly require chocolate sauce and sprinkles. One
doesn't actually need to find a device to kill the time just
because the mobile over one's crib has stopped spinning.

Funny how people try so hard to "kill time" or "pass the time"
....whenever we're not busy frantically worried about not having
enough time.


You must be old. I am, so I agree with this post.
[]'s

I refuse to own a phone that's smarter than me. I'd always be looking
over my shoulder.

--
p-0.0-h the cat

Attention new posters. Bewa ACF is under attack by a small number of
trolls who post false and misleading replies to questions here, and run
campaigns of lies against some of the long term regulars in order to get
them killfiled.

These are my recommendations to filter their malicious trollspam

By filtering out messages containing
q34wsk20-at-yahoo.com AND AND
in the "From:" header and messages containing "ccountrynet" in the path statement
you will knock out more than half or even three quarters of the trollspamming in
this group.

I also recommend filtering all crossposts, anonymous remailers, and any
posts with these providers in the path:

eternal-september.org
dotsrc.org
ccountrynet especially this one
individual.net
easynews.com
anonymous