If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Easy way to check 2 similar cameras please
Rob G wrote:
I've got two Panasonic FX01's. OK it's a basic P & S, but not too bad a one for the price I've paid. Why 2 and why the question? The screen on my first got broken. I bought a second off Ebay for an acceptable price mainly because it was cheap, I'm familiar with the camera and didn't particularly want to go through the 'analysing what's best for me' process again. I also then went ahead and replaced the screen on the first, partly to satisfy the challenge of being able to do so. That was successful. So I've now got 2 identical working cameras. But there will be differences and before I pop of one of them back onto Ebay, is it likely these differences will be detectable and how easy to find ? Thanks Rob First of all, the test conditions must be identical and reproducible. I suggest using a tripod and using the time delay (10 seconds?) to trip the shutter. Set both cameras on Program AE, Same ISO, Fine Quality, etc. Choose a camera-to-subject distance of about 15 feet. As your subject, use a page from a quality magazine with several font sizes of text and some color pictures. Take several pictures with each camera at wide, normal and max tele focal lengths. When you display the images on your computer, you will find that your eyes are exquisitely sensitive to the clarity of text. If the text sizes are chosen correctly, you should BARELY be able to read the words taken with the best camera. With the poorer camera, you will be able to read much less of the text. Compare the accuracy of the colors on both cameras vs your original magazine page. Bob Williams P.S. Make sure that the sky is clear so clouds will not drift over the sun during the test process. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Easy way to check 2 similar cameras please
Rob G wrote:
On 23 May, 08:19, Bob Williams wrote: Rob G wrote: I've got two Panasonic FX01's. OK it's a basic P & S, but not too bad a one for the price I've paid. Why 2 and why the question? The screen on my first got broken. I bought a second off Ebay for an acceptable price mainly because it was cheap, I'm familiar with the camera and didn't particularly want to go through the 'analysing what's best for me' process again. I also then went ahead and replaced the screen on the first, partly to satisfy the challenge of being able to do so. That was successful. So I've now got 2 identical working cameras. But there will be differences and before I pop of one of them back onto Ebay, is it likely these differences will be detectable and how easy to find ? Thanks Rob First of all, the test conditions must be identical and reproducible. I suggest using a tripod and using the time delay (10 seconds?) to trip the shutter. Set both cameras on Program AE, Same ISO, Fine Quality, etc. Choose a camera-to-subject distance of about 15 feet. As your subject, use a page from a quality magazine with several font sizes of text and some color pictures. Take several pictures with each camera at wide, normal and max tele focal lengths. When you display the images on your computer, you will find that your eyes are exquisitely sensitive to the clarity of text. If the text sizes are chosen correctly, you should BARELY be able to read the words taken with the best camera. With the poorer camera, you will be able to read much less of the text. Compare the accuracy of the colors on both cameras vs your original magazine page. Bob Williams P.S. Make sure that the sky is clear so clouds will not drift over the sun during the test process. Many thanks Bob - that's the guidance I was looking for. It will be interesting to see if there is much difference. As for the rest of you (less Grimly C ) - I knew that this NG was suffering badly from spammers, but I hadn't realised it was also been taken over in parts by idiots. Firstly I said that I'd been successful in replacing the screen, try reading and understanding Ofnuts, and in terms of deceptive practice, what is the difference between replacing a screen in a camera and some broken part in a car you sell ? Rob The fact that the camera was repaired, and not even by a professional, should not be concealed. It affects the value of the camera, which is probably why you don't want it known. As for a car, turning back the odometer when you are selling a car is illegal in most states. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Easy way to check 2 similar cameras please
"Rob G" wrote in message ... On 23 May, 08:19, Bob Williams wrote: Rob G wrote: I've got two Panasonic FX01's. OK it's a basic P & S, but not too bad a one for the price I've paid. Why 2 and why the question? The screen on my first got broken. I bought a second off Ebay for an acceptable price mainly because it was cheap, I'm familiar with the camera and didn't particularly want to go through the 'analysing what's best for me' process again. I also then went ahead and replaced the screen on the first, partly to satisfy the challenge of being able to do so. That was successful. So I've now got 2 identical working cameras. But there will be differences and before I pop of one of them back onto Ebay, is it likely these differences will be detectable and how easy to find ? Thanks Rob First of all, the test conditions must be identical and reproducible. I suggest using a tripod and using the time delay (10 seconds?) to trip the shutter. Set both cameras on Program AE, Same ISO, Fine Quality, etc. Choose a camera-to-subject distance of about 15 feet. As your subject, use a page from a quality magazine with several font sizes of text and some color pictures. Take several pictures with each camera at wide, normal and max tele focal lengths. When you display the images on your computer, you will find that your eyes are exquisitely sensitive to the clarity of text. If the text sizes are chosen correctly, you should BARELY be able to read the words taken with the best camera. With the poorer camera, you will be able to read much less of the text. Compare the accuracy of the colors on both cameras vs your original magazine page. Bob Williams P.S. Make sure that the sky is clear so clouds will not drift over the sun during the test process. Many thanks Bob - that's the guidance I was looking for. It will be interesting to see if there is much difference. As for the rest of you (less Grimly C ) - I knew that this NG was suffering badly from spammers, but I hadn't realised it was also been taken over in parts by idiots. Firstly I said that I'd been successful in replacing the screen, try reading and understanding Ofnuts, and in terms of deceptive practice, what is the difference between replacing a screen in a camera and some broken part in a car you sell ? Rob How was my response "idiotic?" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Easy way to check 2 similar cameras please | Ofnuts | Digital Photography | 2 | May 23rd 09 06:05 PM |
easy buy cameras | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | January 21st 08 05:23 PM |
Olympus Cameras - similar / consistent results from most of their cameras? | Paul D. Sullivan | Digital Photography | 20 | August 5th 07 09:03 PM |