If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
David J. Littleboy wrote:
"Ron Hunter" wrote in message ... Rick S. wrote: I see I can get a 1 Gb compactflash card for 20 or 30 bucks more than a 512 Mb card.... seems a no brainer to me, I'd like to get a coupla 1 G's rather than 4 512's, (I'm going on a long trip and will not have any downloading capability). Is there any reason I should avoid such a big capacity card? Is it the same technology in both? Any body have any failures on gigabyte cards? I'm going to stick with established namebrands, either sandisk or lexar, and my camera can handle the size. thanks ahead of time for any input, Rick Theoretically, you are more likely to suffer a single failure if you have 4 cards than if you have one card. However, in practical use, there is very little chance of a problem with any one card. The reason many people choose to use smaller cards is that if one of them dies, or just gets lost or damaged, then the potential for loss is less. I would rate the chance of loss as the highest probablity, with damage second, and an actual card failure as least likely. You pays your money, and you takes your chances... My concern is with the tiny pins in the CF connector. I've seen too many bent pins (admittedly in other, but similar, types of connector) to be able to pop CF cards in and out of sockets and cameras and PC adapters blithly. I buy the biggest card I can afford and never take it out of the camera. Sure, download takes an age, but one has to eat and sleep, and it can be overlapped with one of those. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan The pins are deep within the camera. If the card slot is properly designed, there can't be a misalignment when inserting the card. Contamination of the card slot is a remote posibility if reasonable care is exercised. Of course if you operate in hostile environments, you are probably doing a wise thing. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
David J. Littleboy wrote:
"Ron Hunter" wrote in message ... Rick S. wrote: I see I can get a 1 Gb compactflash card for 20 or 30 bucks more than a 512 Mb card.... seems a no brainer to me, I'd like to get a coupla 1 G's rather than 4 512's, (I'm going on a long trip and will not have any downloading capability). Is there any reason I should avoid such a big capacity card? Is it the same technology in both? Any body have any failures on gigabyte cards? I'm going to stick with established namebrands, either sandisk or lexar, and my camera can handle the size. thanks ahead of time for any input, Rick Theoretically, you are more likely to suffer a single failure if you have 4 cards than if you have one card. However, in practical use, there is very little chance of a problem with any one card. The reason many people choose to use smaller cards is that if one of them dies, or just gets lost or damaged, then the potential for loss is less. I would rate the chance of loss as the highest probablity, with damage second, and an actual card failure as least likely. You pays your money, and you takes your chances... My concern is with the tiny pins in the CF connector. I've seen too many bent pins (admittedly in other, but similar, types of connector) to be able to pop CF cards in and out of sockets and cameras and PC adapters blithly. I buy the biggest card I can afford and never take it out of the camera. Sure, download takes an age, but one has to eat and sleep, and it can be overlapped with one of those. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan The pins are deep within the camera. If the card slot is properly designed, there can't be a misalignment when inserting the card. Contamination of the card slot is a remote posibility if reasonable care is exercised. Of course if you operate in hostile environments, you are probably doing a wise thing. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Try these link $88 for 1G Sandisk CF
http://www.buy.com/retail/product.as...47&dcaid=17073 http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=10318746&adid=17073&sssdmh=dm5.973 47&dcaid=17073 Rick S. wrote: I see I can get a 1 Gb compactflash card for 20 or 30 bucks more than a 512 Mb card.... seems a no brainer to me, I'd like to get a coupla 1 G's rather than 4 512's, (I'm going on a long trip and will not have any downloading capability). Is there any reason I should avoid such a big capacity card? Is it the same technology in both? Any body have any failures on gigabyte cards? I'm going to stick with established namebrands, either sandisk or lexar, and my camera can handle the size. thanks ahead of time for any input, Rick |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Try these link $88 for 1G Sandisk CF
http://www.buy.com/retail/product.as...47&dcaid=17073 http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=10318746&adid=17073&sssdmh=dm5.973 47&dcaid=17073 Rick S. wrote: I see I can get a 1 Gb compactflash card for 20 or 30 bucks more than a 512 Mb card.... seems a no brainer to me, I'd like to get a coupla 1 G's rather than 4 512's, (I'm going on a long trip and will not have any downloading capability). Is there any reason I should avoid such a big capacity card? Is it the same technology in both? Any body have any failures on gigabyte cards? I'm going to stick with established namebrands, either sandisk or lexar, and my camera can handle the size. thanks ahead of time for any input, Rick |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Ken Tough wrote:
Gene Palmiter wrote: OK....where could a person go for a long trip where they could not empty their card...but where they can recharge batteries and eat and all that other stuff. A long camping trip...might be....you can charge with solar panels. But, mostly....you can get a CD burned anywhere. Really? I can think of a lot of places where CD burning is a bit of a mission. As you get outside Namerica (esp in rural areas), the capabilities will drop drastically, and prices could be steep. My wife is going to the Antarctic this December. Anyone know of a place where she can burn a CD? With all those penguins you'd think that some of them would be running Linux... ----- Paul J. Gans |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
grim wrote:
"Gene Palmiter" wrote OK....where could a person go for a long trip where they could not empty their card...but where they can recharge batteries and eat and all that other stuff. A long camping trip...might be....you can charge with solar panels. If he's hiking, he wouldn't want to pack a solar charger in his backpack. Space is too much at a premium. A couple sets of non-rechargable lithium batteries should provide plenty of juice (if his camera uses AAs). If he has to use recharagables, bring along 3 or 4 batteries. He should be able to shoot over a thousand pictures. But, mostly....you can get a CD burned anywhere. Frankly, there are areas in the world where I would not trust handing over *anything* the least bit expensive (like a CF card) to someone for them to burn a CD. Many locals are just waiting to rip-off western tourists. The local cops are in on it, too. Everything is corruption and scams in these places. Keep your valuables close and hidden, and your wits about you. (Hey... sounds like good advice for New York as well! lol) Nah. We have pseudo camera stores on every corner in midtown. All sorts of exotic out-of-date stuff at higher than list prices. We steal legally. ----- Paul J. Gans |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
grim wrote:
"Gene Palmiter" wrote OK....where could a person go for a long trip where they could not empty their card...but where they can recharge batteries and eat and all that other stuff. A long camping trip...might be....you can charge with solar panels. If he's hiking, he wouldn't want to pack a solar charger in his backpack. Space is too much at a premium. A couple sets of non-rechargable lithium batteries should provide plenty of juice (if his camera uses AAs). If he has to use recharagables, bring along 3 or 4 batteries. He should be able to shoot over a thousand pictures. But, mostly....you can get a CD burned anywhere. Frankly, there are areas in the world where I would not trust handing over *anything* the least bit expensive (like a CF card) to someone for them to burn a CD. Many locals are just waiting to rip-off western tourists. The local cops are in on it, too. Everything is corruption and scams in these places. Keep your valuables close and hidden, and your wits about you. (Hey... sounds like good advice for New York as well! lol) Nah. We have pseudo camera stores on every corner in midtown. All sorts of exotic out-of-date stuff at higher than list prices. We steal legally. ----- Paul J. Gans |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
I prefer 512 cards at the moment, I can fill it up then copy it over to one folder on my laptop, then drag and drop that folder onto my CD drive and burn a backup. now with a 1gb or larger card I would have to stop and select so many images, then wait for that cd to burn, then copy over the balance of the folder. so while its easier to shoot more on one card for less money per mb, its more efficient for me to get the rest of the work flow going. Now my kodak only puts about 32 images on a 512 so, while that's not that much different than shooting film (30 on my 645 with 220, 36 on the nikon) when I see the 2gb cards come down in price I'll get a DVD drive. I see I can get a 1 Gb compactflash card for 20 or 30 bucks more than a 512 Mb card.... seems a no brainer to me, I'd like to get a coupla 1 G's rather than 4 512's, (I'm going on a long trip and will not have any downloading capability). Is there any reason I should avoid such a big capacity card? Is it the same technology in both? Any body have any failures on gigabyte cards? I'm going to stick with established namebrands, either sandisk or lexar, and my camera can handle the size. thanks ahead of time for any input, Rick |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
I prefer 512 cards at the moment, I can fill it up then copy it over to one folder on my laptop, then drag and drop that folder onto my CD drive and burn a backup. now with a 1gb or larger card I would have to stop and select so many images, then wait for that cd to burn, then copy over the balance of the folder. so while its easier to shoot more on one card for less money per mb, its more efficient for me to get the rest of the work flow going. Now my kodak only puts about 32 images on a 512 so, while that's not that much different than shooting film (30 on my 645 with 220, 36 on the nikon) when I see the 2gb cards come down in price I'll get a DVD drive. I see I can get a 1 Gb compactflash card for 20 or 30 bucks more than a 512 Mb card.... seems a no brainer to me, I'd like to get a coupla 1 G's rather than 4 512's, (I'm going on a long trip and will not have any downloading capability). Is there any reason I should avoid such a big capacity card? Is it the same technology in both? Any body have any failures on gigabyte cards? I'm going to stick with established namebrands, either sandisk or lexar, and my camera can handle the size. thanks ahead of time for any input, Rick |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Really? I can think of a lot of places where CD burning is a bit of a mission. As you get outside Namerica (esp in rural areas), the capabilities will drop drastically, and prices could be steep. My wife is going to the Antarctic this December. Anyone know of a place where she can burn a CD? With all those penguins you'd think that some of them would be running Linux... I would imagine that those researchers would be the most computer literate folks of any. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kodak dc 4800 with Compact Flash Card | jim | Digital Photography | 8 | August 31st 04 03:17 PM |
Comparing Compact Flash Card types | Rick Miller | Digital Photography | 5 | July 20th 04 01:32 PM |
Compact Flash Memory Card costs | Engineer | Digital Photography | 7 | June 25th 04 11:32 PM |