A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bloomberg hints at DSLR coffin being nailed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old September 20th 11, 06:53 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
David Dyer-Bennet
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,814
Default Bloomberg hints at DSLR coffin being nailed

Bruce writes:

David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Bruce writes:
The result is that one of my Leica lenses is worth (used) three times
what I paid for it (used) and the other four times.


Convenient to have gotten in early!



Just lucky. I thought I was paying a high price at that time and
never imagined they would gain so much in value. The problem is, I
feel under some pressure to keep them because I could probably never
justify the cost of replacement.


That's a good part of why I never replaced the Leica. My old equipment,
M3 and 35, 50, and 90 Summicrons, and a Pentax Spotmatic with a bunch of
glass, were stolen (around 1980), and with the insurance money I chose
to replace the SLR side first, on the theory that they MIGHT have
improved enough that I didn't need the Leica any more. Well, sort, of,
they had; not as good in low light, but tolerable (with a Beattie
Intenscreen).

I would like AF more if it worked better. For classic portraiture
with an 85mm f/1.4 used wide open, AF is an irritating waste of time.
So I prefer manual focus and my D3 and Kodak DCS 14n both have KatzEye
split image focusing screens. I'm still having problems with retinal
bleeding in my dominant right eye but I am coping. I just need a
little more patience.


I found as early as 1994 that it works significantly better for me (that
test was primarily with an 80-200/2.8 on an N90). I thought about a
Katzeye for my D200 (and now for my D700, though I've gotten rid of two
of my most interesting manual-focus lenses, the 58/1.2 NOCT and the
135/1.8 AIS), but the camera has to be away for too long


I bought the screens mail order and had them fitted locally. I
collected one from the technician only an hour and a half after
leaving it.


That makes it easier. I don't know anyplace locally anymore that does
repair work, unfortunately.

, and my eyes
are even older than in 1994 (I actually started wearing reading glasses
in 1999).


You could fit an eyepiece correction lens.


I guess I could consider a prescription eyepiece for the astigmatism.
The diopter adjustment is plenty strong enough to get the spherical
correction I need.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dustin Hoffman is claiming he could have nailed Princess Diana SNL hosts aren't funny Digital Photography 1 December 10th 06 04:58 AM
Dustin Hoffman is claiming he could have nailed Princess Diana SNL hosts aren't funny 35mm Photo Equipment 1 December 10th 06 04:58 AM
NAILED BY THE 20D ! Annika1980 Digital Photography 10 July 6th 06 03:20 PM
NAILED BY THE 20D ! Annika1980 35mm Photo Equipment 11 July 6th 06 07:44 AM
Bloomberg on total digital camera sales RichA Digital SLR Cameras 0 May 1st 05 03:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.