If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Adobe Grrr
On 2014-08-17 16:44:58 +0000, "R. Mark Clayton"
said: "Savageduck" wrote in message news:2014081513161174819-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom... On 2014-08-15 19:38:29 +0000, nospam said: In article , PeterN wrote: if someone doesn't want to pay the asking price, they can seek an alternate solution. don't deny those who do want to pay the asking price for the product or service. The vendor ensures itself that the money received is the agreed upon price. The purchaser should receive exactly what he is paying for. nobody said otherwise. not a matter of "said." The point is that Adobe failed to properly disclose its policy about the photography subscription. I have a right to feel taken. how did they do that? you got what you paid for. did they say that all future plug-ins will be available to all users? if so, cite it. The problem is the Adobe Market & Typekit are touted as a feature of CC. However, when the subscriber to the Photograph Plan try to access either one, they are told they need to upgrade. They are not told this in any of the marketing information for CC. They have to dig and research, and bitch to discover why there subscription isn't good enough to have the doors to the stores opened for them. That seems to be short sightedness on the part of Adobe marketing. Why on earth would I, currently paying $9.99/month for PS CC 2014 + LR5, upgrade to the single app plan for PS CC 2014 only at 19.99/month just to get my foot in the door of the store? Adobe has a lesson to learn from Apple and the iTunes store here. Buy access to any part of the CC and you should have access to developers & vendors selling their wares for whatever apps you are subscribing to. Fortunately it works that way for Add-Ons where Pay & Free items are available. Like in the iTunes store some are useful and superb and add to productivity and others are crap, some are free-bees setting the bait for pay stuff, but that you can deal with. We should have been told up front that when we subscribed and got all that was actually touted, PC, LR5, Behance, 20GB CC storage that we weren't getting access to the Market & Typekit. -- Regards, Savageduck Indeed and a discussion like this tells me that Adobe are a software supplier to avoid if possible. All griping aside, Photoshop + Lightroom gives me a workflow I am comfortable and productive with. It remains the standard against which all others of the genre are measured. It is far more balance in price at $9.99/month than working out on the Adobe upgrade treadmill. The disappointment is finding this one failing in their marketing plan. However, that is not going to stop me from using PS + LR, but it effectively blocks me from spending anything in their Market, and that is dumb. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Adobe Grrr
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 06:09:36 -0700 (PDT), Whisky-dave
wrote: : On Friday, 15 August 2014 02:18:24 UTC+1, Robert Coe wrote: : : : : I just don't get why so much that shouldn't be is being shoved into : : the "cloud". : : : : You don't? Seriously? You must be either blind, deaf, or not a resident of the : United States. The answer is Capitalist GREED. Nothing more, nothing less. : : I don't think that's the case, I think it's more down to convinience for the majority. : : : : Hard drives are dirt cheap per MB, and it really only makes sense to put : : things online if you need to access them elsewhere. : : Wait until you have to rent HDs instead of buying them. : : That's won't happen because they are too cheap to buy. : : I'm old enough to : remember when IBM had a hammer lock on computer equipment, and you had to rent : EVERYTHING. : : Partly because of cost and unrelibility, the 'rent, was more usually a service contract. : We used to rent computers from HP via a service contract. if something went wrong with : the computer wheter it be software or hardware a 'man' would turn up and eventaully : sovle/fix the problem. : : : : The Government eventually quashed that, : : was it really the government ? Yes. IBM's policy of refusing to sell their equipment, and of "bundling" their operating system software with the hardware, was found to be a violation of U.S. anti-trust laws. Bob |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Adobe Grrr
On 2014-08-25 08:11:58 +0000, qo'shni said:
'PeterN[_5_ Wrote: ;1001842']ccI have a photography subscription to CC. When I tried to download a brush from the CC market I was told that market items are only available to paid subscribers, and was asked if I want to upgrade. Isn't a photography subscription a paid subscription. I posed the question on the contact Adobe live chat, but was told it was a technical problem. Has anyone else had that experience? TIA -- PeterN buy the official version of the program then it works The only "official version" of Photoshop you can buy is PS CS6, I know Peter has bought and owns CS6, and so do I. That isn't going to help too much as the minimum requirement to gain access to the *Market* &/or *TypeKit* is a single App subscription to the Creative Cloud, at $20/month. There are a whole bunch of us here, including Peter, who subscribe to the Adobe Photography Program and pay $9.99/month. That includes Photoshop CC 2014 & Lightroom 5, making them as "official" as you can get. I know I am not going to pay more for less. We get access to all of the features of the Creative Cloud with the exception of *Market* & *TypeKit*. That seems to be an Adobe marketing issue. They fixed one problem last year, let's see if they fix this issue this year. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Adobe Grrr
On 8/25/2014 4:11 AM, qo'shni wrote:
'PeterN[_5_ Wrote: ;1001842']ccI have a photography subscription to CC. When I tried to download a brush from the CC market I was told that market items are only available to paid subscribers, and was asked if I want to upgrade. Isn't a photography subscription a paid subscription. I posed the question on the contact Adobe live chat, but was told it was a technical problem. Has anyone else had that experience? TIA -- PeterN buy the official version of the program then it works I subscribe to the official version. All the software pon my system is there legally. It's an Adobe issue, and Adobe recognizes it as such. -- PeterN |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grrr... lens misery | D.M. Procida | 35mm Photo Equipment | 6 | February 28th 07 02:12 AM |
Windows Color Managment, Adobe Working Spaces, Adobe Gamma | Andy Leese | Digital Photography | 9 | November 24th 06 04:38 AM |
F--- Adobe | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 26 | July 25th 06 12:55 AM |
Adobe After Effects 7.0 PRO, Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0 for Windows XP, and tutorials, Adobe After Effects Plugins Collection (WINMAC), updated 19/Jan/2006 | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | February 2nd 06 07:52 AM |