A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

CompactFlash Differences???



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 9th 04, 10:54 AM
Paul Green
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CompactFlash Differences???

We are getting an Olympus C-5060. That decision was hard enough. Now, we
want to get a 1 gb memory card. Because the camera uses both xD and
CompactFlash cards, this seems like an easy choice. The xD cards are about
double the price of the CompactFlash, and they don't even come in 1 gb
configurations. Deciding which CompactFlash card to use is what is making
me nuts. I notice that lots of the memory makers produce two or more
different versions, with one supposedly faster than the other. For example,
both Kingston and Sandisk make a "regular" and a "fast" card. But what does
it mean? How will this speed difference manifest itself? Will the camera
work better/faster with a faster memory card?

Also, which brands/makes/models of CompactFlash cards really do work better
or faster? And is the Olympus C-5060 actually capable of taking advantage
of the faster card? I have read a lot of stuff, some of which calls the
claims of faster cards into question. Price-wise, it means the difference
between spending maybe $120 for a 1 gb Kingston or Sandisk card to $150 for
a faster version from one of these manufacturers to more than $200 for one
of the other brands of "fast" CompactFlash cards. And some claim to be 4x,
while others 40x. Since there are no actual standards, what does this mean?

Anyone who can enlighten me would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Paul Green


  #2  
Old August 9th 04, 11:19 AM
Rick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CompactFlash Differences???

"Paul Green" pgreen @ comcast.net wrote in message ...
We are getting an Olympus C-5060. That decision was hard enough. Now, we
want to get a 1 gb memory card. Because the camera uses both xD and
CompactFlash cards, this seems like an easy choice. The xD cards are about
double the price of the CompactFlash, and they don't even come in 1 gb
configurations. Deciding which CompactFlash card to use is what is making
me nuts. I notice that lots of the memory makers produce two or more
different versions, with one supposedly faster than the other. For example,
both Kingston and Sandisk make a "regular" and a "fast" card. But what does
it mean? How will this speed difference manifest itself? Will the camera
work better/faster with a faster memory card?

Also, which brands/makes/models of CompactFlash cards really do work better
or faster? And is the Olympus C-5060 actually capable of taking advantage
of the faster card? I have read a lot of stuff, some of which calls the
claims of faster cards into question. Price-wise, it means the difference
between spending maybe $120 for a 1 gb Kingston or Sandisk card to $150 for
a faster version from one of these manufacturers to more than $200 for one
of the other brands of "fast" CompactFlash cards. And some claim to be 4x,
while others 40x. Since there are no actual standards, what does this mean?

Anyone who can enlighten me would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.


The x number refers to the speed of a floppy disk drive.
1x = 150KB/second. An 8X card can transfer at a
maximum rate of 1.2MB/second. A 40X card at a
maximum rate of 6MB/second, and so on.

How much difference in performance you'll see depends
on the individual camera, and the size of its internal buffer.
Some cameras benefit more from fast CF cards than others.
I don't have any specific experience with the C-5060, but
all of the five cameras I own do benefit from faster memory
in one way or another, whether it's in the time delay between
shots, or in reviewing speed, transfer speed to a PC, etc.
In most cases you're better off buying the fastest memory
you can afford.

One caviat about Lexar: their performance ratings are a
bit misleading. They use an acceleration scheme which only
works on certain cameras. If yours is not one of them,
don't waste your money -- get Sandisk or another brand.
We've had great luck with Sandisk's Ultra II. Blazing fast.

Rick


  #3  
Old August 9th 04, 11:38 AM
Brendon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CompactFlash Differences???

I have no idea whether the C-5060 will take advantage of a faster CF card,
but here is an interesting comparison of different cards in a Nikon D70:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/mul...?cid=6007-6816

"Paul Green" pgreen @ comcast.net wrote in message
...
We are getting an Olympus C-5060. That decision was hard enough. Now, we
want to get a 1 gb memory card. Because the camera uses both xD and
CompactFlash cards, this seems like an easy choice. The xD cards are

about
double the price of the CompactFlash, and they don't even come in 1 gb
configurations. Deciding which CompactFlash card to use is what is making
me nuts. I notice that lots of the memory makers produce two or more
different versions, with one supposedly faster than the other. For

example,
both Kingston and Sandisk make a "regular" and a "fast" card. But what

does
it mean? How will this speed difference manifest itself? Will the camera
work better/faster with a faster memory card?

Also, which brands/makes/models of CompactFlash cards really do work

better
or faster? And is the Olympus C-5060 actually capable of taking advantage
of the faster card? I have read a lot of stuff, some of which calls the
claims of faster cards into question. Price-wise, it means the difference
between spending maybe $120 for a 1 gb Kingston or Sandisk card to $150

for
a faster version from one of these manufacturers to more than $200 for one
of the other brands of "fast" CompactFlash cards. And some claim to be

4x,
while others 40x. Since there are no actual standards, what does this

mean?

Anyone who can enlighten me would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Paul Green




  #4  
Old August 9th 04, 11:38 AM
Brendon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CompactFlash Differences???

I have no idea whether the C-5060 will take advantage of a faster CF card,
but here is an interesting comparison of different cards in a Nikon D70:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/mul...?cid=6007-6816

"Paul Green" pgreen @ comcast.net wrote in message
...
We are getting an Olympus C-5060. That decision was hard enough. Now, we
want to get a 1 gb memory card. Because the camera uses both xD and
CompactFlash cards, this seems like an easy choice. The xD cards are

about
double the price of the CompactFlash, and they don't even come in 1 gb
configurations. Deciding which CompactFlash card to use is what is making
me nuts. I notice that lots of the memory makers produce two or more
different versions, with one supposedly faster than the other. For

example,
both Kingston and Sandisk make a "regular" and a "fast" card. But what

does
it mean? How will this speed difference manifest itself? Will the camera
work better/faster with a faster memory card?

Also, which brands/makes/models of CompactFlash cards really do work

better
or faster? And is the Olympus C-5060 actually capable of taking advantage
of the faster card? I have read a lot of stuff, some of which calls the
claims of faster cards into question. Price-wise, it means the difference
between spending maybe $120 for a 1 gb Kingston or Sandisk card to $150

for
a faster version from one of these manufacturers to more than $200 for one
of the other brands of "fast" CompactFlash cards. And some claim to be

4x,
while others 40x. Since there are no actual standards, what does this

mean?

Anyone who can enlighten me would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Paul Green




  #5  
Old August 9th 04, 02:13 PM
Fedman Kassad
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flashcards x factor - was CompactFlash Differences???

snip

The x number refers to the speed of a floppy disk drive.
1x = 150KB/second. An 8X card can transfer at a
maximum rate of 1.2MB/second. A 40X card at a
maximum rate of 6MB/second, and so on.


nitpick

Your calculations are correct, but I think 1x refers to the speed of an audio CD
player or an 1x CD-Rom drive (doh!).
As far as I can remember floppy disk drives are quite slower than that, infact
you couldn't play a stream of cd-quality PCM audio from a floppy disk without
experiencing sound breakups.

/nitpick

Greetings

FDKS

  #6  
Old August 9th 04, 02:13 PM
Fedman Kassad
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flashcards x factor - was CompactFlash Differences???

snip

The x number refers to the speed of a floppy disk drive.
1x = 150KB/second. An 8X card can transfer at a
maximum rate of 1.2MB/second. A 40X card at a
maximum rate of 6MB/second, and so on.


nitpick

Your calculations are correct, but I think 1x refers to the speed of an audio CD
player or an 1x CD-Rom drive (doh!).
As far as I can remember floppy disk drives are quite slower than that, infact
you couldn't play a stream of cd-quality PCM audio from a floppy disk without
experiencing sound breakups.

/nitpick

Greetings

FDKS

  #7  
Old August 9th 04, 03:47 PM
nellybly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CompactFlash Differences???

In article , Paul Green @ wrote:
Also, which brands/makes/models of CompactFlash cards really do work better
or faster? And is the Olympus C-5060 actually capable of taking advantage
of the faster card? I have read a lot of stuff, some of which calls the
claims of faster cards into question. Price-wise, it means the difference
between spending maybe $120 for a 1 gb Kingston or Sandisk card to $150 for
a faster version from one of these manufacturers to more than $200 for one
of the other brands of "fast" CompactFlash cards. And some claim to be 4x,
while others 40x. Since there are no actual standards, what does this mean?

Anyone who can enlighten me would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Paul Green


Hi Paul,
Here is a page that compares card speeds specifically for the C-50X0
cameras:
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/c5050/c5050-card.html
Check out the other articles available he
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/c5050/c5050-card.html
hth,
NB
  #8  
Old August 9th 04, 03:47 PM
nellybly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CompactFlash Differences???

In article , Paul Green @ wrote:
Also, which brands/makes/models of CompactFlash cards really do work better
or faster? And is the Olympus C-5060 actually capable of taking advantage
of the faster card? I have read a lot of stuff, some of which calls the
claims of faster cards into question. Price-wise, it means the difference
between spending maybe $120 for a 1 gb Kingston or Sandisk card to $150 for
a faster version from one of these manufacturers to more than $200 for one
of the other brands of "fast" CompactFlash cards. And some claim to be 4x,
while others 40x. Since there are no actual standards, what does this mean?

Anyone who can enlighten me would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Paul Green


Hi Paul,
Here is a page that compares card speeds specifically for the C-50X0
cameras:
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/c5050/c5050-card.html
Check out the other articles available he
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/c5050/c5050-card.html
hth,
NB
  #9  
Old August 9th 04, 03:54 PM
nellybly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CompactFlash Differences???



Hi Paul,
Here is a page that compares card speeds specifically for the C-50X0
cameras:
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/c5050/c5050-card.html
Check out the other articles available he
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/c5050/c5050-card.html
hth,
NB

OOOPS! That second link should be
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/c5050/index.html
NB
  #10  
Old August 9th 04, 03:54 PM
nellybly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Hi Paul,
Here is a page that compares card speeds specifically for the C-50X0
cameras:
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/c5050/c5050-card.html
Check out the other articles available he
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/c5050/c5050-card.html
hth,
NB

OOOPS! That second link should be
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/c5050/index.html
NB
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon 300d - Differences betwen US and Australian versions of Graham and Beth Harden Digital Photography 15 July 24th 04 04:11 AM
High-speed CompactFlash for Canon S410 Ed Swierk Digital Photography 1 July 2nd 04 09:41 PM
For Canon aficionados? Differences Between Canon S410, A80 and SD10 models. Steve Lee Digital Photography 3 June 29th 04 12:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.