A 500mm Pano

(Annika1980) wrote:
What was impressive about it ... the fact that it was done with a 500mm?
The blending could be better.
Oh, I know. It was B&W so it has to be good!
===============================

What's wrong with the blending? I think the fact that it was done with a
500mm is impressive, It has a really wide look.




Cody,

http://community-2.webtv.net/AnOverc...otographyLinks

On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:27:11 +0100, (Ralf R. Radermacher)
wrote:
Matt wrote:
Can tell you are German.

With your lack of knowledge about the finer details of European names
and nationalities and your superficial way of judging things, you must
be American. :-)
Ralf

Still mad about losing the war Herr Radermacher?
Did you fight under the Kaiser, or the Furer?
No doubt you are an expert on photographing bridges.

Michael...

On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:27:11 +0100, (Ralf R. Radermacher)
wrote:
Matt wrote:
Can tell you are German.

With your lack of knowledge about the finer details of European names
and nationalities and your superficial way of judging things, you must
be American. :-)
Ralf

Still mad about losing the war Herr Radermacher?
Did you fight under the Kaiser, or the Furer?
No doubt you are an expert on photographing bridges.

Michael...

On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:51:05 -0800, "Mark²" mjmorgan(lowest even
number wrote:

What was impressive about it ... the fact that it was done with a 500mm?
The blending could be better.
Oh, I know. It was B&W so it has to be good!

You said you "really like that one."
What...did you change your mind?

I liked the vertical pano of the tall trees. The bridge pano was
kinda dull.

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 03:40:52 -0600, wrote:

What's wrong with the blending? I think the fact that it was done with a
500mm is impressive, It has a really wide look.

Look at the areas of sky both above and below the bridge.
Some of the areas are a mess, especially a big dark blob in the sky
to the right of the pic.

Note that the stitching was fine. It was the blending that needed
work. Perhaps thats why he went with B&W?

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 03:40:52 -0600, wrote:

What's wrong with the blending? I think the fact that it was done with a
500mm is impressive, It has a really wide look.

Look at the areas of sky both above and below the bridge.
Some of the areas are a mess, especially a big dark blob in the sky
to the right of the pic.

Note that the stitching was fine. It was the blending that needed
work. Perhaps thats why he went with B&W?

Michael wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:27:11 +0100, (Ralf R. Radermacher)
wrote:

Matt wrote:

Can tell you are German.

With your lack of knowledge about the finer details of European names
and nationalities and your superficial way of judging things, you must
be American. :-)
Ralf


Still mad about losing the war Herr Radermacher?
Did you fight under the Kaiser, or the Furer?
No doubt you are an expert on photographing bridges.

Michael...

And yet another "intelligent" American who evidently knows a lot about
the World...

Michael wrote:

On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:27:11 +0100, (Ralf R. Radermacher)
wrote:

Matt wrote:

Can tell you are German.

With your lack of knowledge about the finer details of European names
and nationalities and your superficial way of judging things, you must
be American. :-)
Ralf


Still mad about losing the war Herr Radermacher?
Did you fight under the Kaiser, or the Furer?
No doubt you are an expert on photographing bridges.

Michael...


And yet another fine product of the American education system...

On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:34:22 +0100, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:

"Mark"" mjmorgan(lowest even number wrote:

What's with all the offensive stereotyping here???

Oh, nothing. Just the usual nonsense from a few nutters who think their
passport makes them something better than other people. Never mind. :-)

Ralf

Mistaken nationalities.

I know many Austrians who live in Germany but hate to be called Germans. I
suppose it's like Canadians who are often mistaken for Americans, or New
Zealanders who are often mistaken for Australians. Guaranteed to **** 'em
off.

On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:34:22 +0100, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:

"Mark"" mjmorgan(lowest even number wrote:

What's with all the offensive stereotyping here???

Oh, nothing. Just the usual nonsense from a few nutters who think their
passport makes them something better than other people. Never mind. :-)

Ralf

Mistaken nationalities.

I know many Austrians who live in Germany but hate to be called Germans. I
suppose it's like Canadians who are often mistaken for Americans, or New
Zealanders who are often mistaken for Australians. Guaranteed to **** 'em
off.