KINGFISHERS LOVE THE 40D!

On Jan 13, 12:07*am, "Rita Berkowitz" wrote:

Cite, please?

YAWN

We've covered this before. *Anybody that is remotely interested can simply
Google it up. *Again, I did save the messages with full header on my server
should they mysteriously vanish from Google.


If true, then you should be able to provide a reference.
Otherwise, STFU.

On Jan 13, 12:07*am, "Rita Berkowitz" wrote:
*Here is the full-frame shot of my pic, reduced in size of
course..

Really? *I know better than to assume that you would zoom with your feet..


So admit that I can walk on water?

Chris Malcolm wrote:

In rec.photo.digital Ken Tough wrote:

Any serious shooter will shoot raw and post-process anyway, so the
fascination at how a high-end camera works as a point'n'shoot is a
bit of a laugh.

You're obviously unaware of the RAW file memory buffering pipeline
speed problems in some serious professional cameras which causes some
serious shooters who need to operate fast to avoid the use of
RAW. You're also obviously unaware that you can set at least most
DSLRs to shoot RAW and to use auto modes, a feature which many serious
shooters who need to operate fast use. That's why most DSLRs allow so
many special customisations to be applied to the auto modes.

Not aware of the problems. I have a camera with CF, and extreme III
write speed gives capture at something like 5 fps. Plenty for me. You
can always go HD video if you want 30 fps. heh heh.

If I was going to use any shots for professional prints, I'd want to be
sure I had raw for post-processing. If you want to do anything like
sharpen, you certainly don't want to do that from an existing jpg.


--
Ken Tough

In rec.photo.digital Ken Tough wrote:
Chris Malcolm wrote:

In rec.photo.digital Ken Tough wrote:

Any serious shooter will shoot raw and post-process anyway, so the
fascination at how a high-end camera works as a point'n'shoot is a
bit of a laugh.

You're obviously unaware of the RAW file memory buffering pipeline
speed problems in some serious professional cameras which causes some
serious shooters who need to operate fast to avoid the use of
RAW. You're also obviously unaware that you can set at least most
DSLRs to shoot RAW and to use auto modes, a feature which many serious
shooters who need to operate fast use. That's why most DSLRs allow so
many special customisations to be applied to the auto modes.

Not aware of the problems. I have a camera with CF, and extreme III
write speed gives capture at something like 5 fps. Plenty for me. You
can always go HD video if you want 30 fps. heh heh.

If I was going to use any shots for professional prints, I'd want to be
sure I had raw for post-processing. If you want to do anything like
sharpen, you certainly don't want to do that from an existing jpg.

You don't want to do it from a jpg which has already had in-camera
sharpening or much compression applied to it. No problems with those
cameras which allow you to output low compression high quality jpgs
without sharpening.

--
Chris Malcolm DoD #205
IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
[http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]