A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The case for "Kaizen", following Fujifilm's Example



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 13th 18, 12:34 AM posted to rec.photo.digital, alt.photography
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,543
Default The case for "Kaizen", following Fujifilm's Example

It has been three years since I made my move from Nikon to Fujifilm, and I
have become an unashamed fan. One of the reasons has been the Fujifilm
philosophy of “Kaizen”, or providing firmware updates/upgrades to improve
existing, and even discontinued models. I have benefitted from several
firmware updates/upgrades to my X-E2, and X-T2 which seemed to perform like
new cameras.

Three years after buying my first X-Series camera I now own three, the X-E2,
X-T2, and an X-E3, along with 6 Fujinon lenses, and I couldn’t be happier.
Though there are at least three other lenses I have my eye on.
G.A.S. is a terrible afliction. ;-)

I would add that I haven’t used my D300S for over a year now, and the only
piece of my Nikon kit I use today is my Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 with a
Nikon-to-Fujifilm adaptor.

Now there is this article from Fstoppers which supports my remarks above, and
asks why other camera manufacturers do not follow a similar philosophy, but
choose to release new models at higher prices, when a firmware update would
have done the same thing.

https://fstoppers.com/originals/why-...ers-should-be-
more-fuji-210834

--

Regards,
Savageduck

  #2  
Old January 13th 18, 12:39 AM posted to rec.photo.digital, alt.photography
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,543
Default The case for "Kaizen", following Fujifilm's Example

On Jan 12, 2018, Savageduck wrote
(in iganews.com):

It has been three years since I made my move from Nikon to Fujifilm, and I
have become an unashamed fan. One of the reasons has been the Fujifilm
philosophy of “Kaizen”, or providing firmware updates/upgrades to improve
existing, and even discontinued models. I have benefitted from several
firmware updates/upgrades to my X-E2, and X-T2 which seemed to perform like
new cameras.

Three years after buying my first X-Series camera I now own three, the X-E2,
X-T2, and an X-E3, along with 6 Fujinon lenses, and I couldn’t be happier.
Though there are at least three other lenses I have my eye on.
G.A.S. is a terrible afliction. ;-)

I would add that I haven’t used my D300S for over a year now, and the only
piece of my Nikon kit I use today is my Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 with a
Nikon-to-Fujifilm adaptor.

Now there is this article from Fstoppers which supports my remarks above, and
asks why other camera manufacturers do not follow a similar philosophy, but
choose to release new models at higher prices, when a firmware update would
have done the same thing.

https://fstoppers.com/originals/why-other-camera-manufacturers-should-be-more-fuji-210834


For some reason that link broke even though I used delimiters.

So...https://tinyurl.com/y7tavwga

--

Regards,
Savageduck

  #3  
Old January 13th 18, 12:42 AM posted to rec.photo.digital,alt.photography
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22,013
Default The case for "Kaizen", following Fujifilm's Example

In article .com,
Savageduck wrote:

Now there is this article from Fstoppers which supports my remarks above,
and
asks why other camera manufacturers do not follow a similar philosophy, but
choose to release new models at higher prices, when a firmware update would
have done the same thing.


https://fstoppers.com/originals/why-...s-should-be-mo
re-fuji-210834


For some reason that link broke even though I used delimiters.


it works fine
  #4  
Old January 13th 18, 01:46 PM posted to rec.photo.digital,alt.photography
Alan Browne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 98
Default The case for "Kaizen", following Fujifilm's Example

On 2018-01-12 19:39, Savageduck wrote:
On Jan 12, 2018, Savageduck wrote
(in iganews.com):

It has been three years since I made my move from Nikon to Fujifilm, and I
have become an unashamed fan. One of the reasons has been the Fujifilm
philosophy of “Kaizen”, or providing firmware updates/upgrades to improve
existing, and even discontinued models. I have benefitted from several
firmware updates/upgrades to my X-E2, and X-T2 which seemed to perform like
new cameras.

Three years after buying my first X-Series camera I now own three, the X-E2,
X-T2, and an X-E3, along with 6 Fujinon lenses, and I couldn’t be happier.
Though there are at least three other lenses I have my eye on.
G.A.S. is a terrible afliction. ;-)

I would add that I haven’t used my D300S for over a year now, and the only
piece of my Nikon kit I use today is my Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 with a
Nikon-to-Fujifilm adaptor.

Now there is this article from Fstoppers which supports my remarks above, and
asks why other camera manufacturers do not follow a similar philosophy, but
choose to release new models at higher prices, when a firmware update would
have done the same thing.

https://fstoppers.com/originals/why-other-camera-manufacturers-should-be-more-fuji-210834


For some reason that link broke even though I used delimiters.


The "broken" original worked fine and the one above is "restored" and
works. Good news readers usually handle broken links.

--
“When it is all said and done, there are approximately 94 million
full-time workers in private industry paying taxes to support 102
million non-workers and 21 million government workers.
In what world does this represent a strong job market?”
..Jim Quinn
  #5  
Old January 13th 18, 01:47 PM posted to rec.photo.digital,alt.photography
Alan Browne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 98
Default The case for "Kaizen", following Fujifilm's Example

On 2018-01-12 19:34, Savageduck wrote:
It has been three years since I made my move from Nikon to Fujifilm, and I
have become an unashamed fan. One of the reasons has been the Fujifilm
philosophy of “Kaizen”, or providing firmware updates/upgrades to improve
existing, and even discontinued models. I have benefitted from several
firmware updates/upgrades to my X-E2, and X-T2 which seemed to perform like
new cameras.

Three years after buying my first X-Series camera I now own three, the X-E2,
X-T2, and an X-E3, along with 6 Fujinon lenses, and I couldn’t be happier.
Though there are at least three other lenses I have my eye on.
G.A.S. is a terrible afliction. ;-)

I would add that I haven’t used my D300S for over a year now, and the only
piece of my Nikon kit I use today is my Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 with a
Nikon-to-Fujifilm adaptor.

Now there is this article from Fstoppers which supports my remarks above, and
asks why other camera manufacturers do not follow a similar philosophy, but
choose to release new models at higher prices, when a firmware update would
have done the same thing.

https://fstoppers.com/originals/why-...ers-should-be-
more-fuji-210834


It's a fine idea and late in coming to cameras. That said, I did F/W
updates to at least one Sony DSLR at some point to address a focus
issue. But they haven't pushed out product improvements (new features)
that way to my knowledge.

--
“When it is all said and done, there are approximately 94 million
full-time workers in private industry paying taxes to support 102
million non-workers and 21 million government workers.
In what world does this represent a strong job market?”
..Jim Quinn
  #6  
Old January 13th 18, 04:37 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,640
Default The case for "Kaizen", following Fujifilm's Example

On 2018.01.13 02:17, RichA wrote:

The problem with business today is the idea that in order to succeed,
you have to have continued growth, meaning you have to make more and
more money, any way you can. We've seen businesses kill themselves
with that attitude, by turning out inferior products or asking users
to pay more and more for essentially the same thing.



The notion that businesses must grow is in part the recycling of profits
toward that growth. Compounding the original investment is the path to
high revenue and return over time.

Unfortunately, with some exceptions, many North American companies are
short term profit growth driven. This takes the eye off the long term.
Further focusing management bonuses on short term objectives and stock
price growth is not exactly beneficial to product development and
quality over time.
  #7  
Old January 14th 18, 10:34 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
PeterN[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,050
Default The case for "Kaizen", following Fujifilm's Example

On 1/13/2018 11:37 AM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2018.01.13 02:17, RichA wrote:

The problem with business today is the idea that in order to succeed,
you have to have continued growth, meaning you have to make more and
more money, any way you can.* We've seen businesses kill themselves
with that attitude, by turning out inferior products or asking users
to pay more and more for essentially the same thing.



The notion that businesses must grow is in part the recycling of profits
toward that growth.* Compounding the original investment is the path to
high revenue and return over time.

Unfortunately, with some exceptions, many North American companies are
short term profit growth driven.* This takes the eye off the long term.
*Further focusing management bonuses on short term objectives and stock
price growth is not exactly beneficial to product development and
quality over time.


That short sighted notion has been around for many years, and is not
likely to go away soon.
e.g. While in college I applied for a job as a salesman. My interview
went something like this:

Sales-manager 'sell me this pencil."

Me: Not if you don't need the pencil."

Sales-manager: " Can you start tomorrow?"


--
PeterN
  #8  
Old January 15th 18, 12:19 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Alan Browne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 98
Default The case for "Kaizen", following Fujifilm's Example

On 2018-01-14 17:34, PeterN wrote:
On 1/13/2018 11:37 AM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2018.01.13 02:17, RichA wrote:

The problem with business today is the idea that in order to succeed,
you have to have continued growth, meaning you have to make more and
more money, any way you can.* We've seen businesses kill themselves
with that attitude, by turning out inferior products or asking users
to pay more and more for essentially the same thing.



The notion that businesses must grow is in part the recycling of
profits toward that growth.* Compounding the original investment is
the path to high revenue and return over time.

Unfortunately, with some exceptions, many North American companies are
short term profit growth driven.* This takes the eye off the long
term. **Further focusing management bonuses on short term objectives
and stock price growth is not exactly beneficial to product
development and quality over time.


That short sighted notion has been around for many years, and is not
likely to go away soon.
e.g. While in college I applied for a job as a salesman. My interview
went something like this:

Sales-manager 'sell me this pencil."

Me: Not if you don't need the pencil."

Sales-manager: " Can you start tomorrow?"


Wrong answer.

Right answer: "Sir, I see you have one of our fine pencils. So, would
you like a special offer for our deluxe sharpener and eraser?"

That gets you the job.

--
“When it is all said and done, there are approximately 94 million
full-time workers in private industry paying taxes to support 102
million non-workers and 21 million government workers.
In what world does this represent a strong job market?”
..Jim Quinn
  #9  
Old January 15th 18, 11:41 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
PeterN[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,050
Default The case for "Kaizen", following Fujifilm's Example

On 1/14/2018 7:19 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2018-01-14 17:34, PeterN wrote:
On 1/13/2018 11:37 AM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2018.01.13 02:17, RichA wrote:

The problem with business today is the idea that in order to succeed,
you have to have continued growth, meaning you have to make more and
more money, any way you can.* We've seen businesses kill themselves
with that attitude, by turning out inferior products or asking users
to pay more and more for essentially the same thing.


The notion that businesses must grow is in part the recycling of
profits toward that growth.* Compounding the original investment is
the path to high revenue and return over time.

Unfortunately, with some exceptions, many North American companies
are short term profit growth driven.* This takes the eye off the long
term. **Further focusing management bonuses on short term objectives
and stock price growth is not exactly beneficial to product
development and quality over time.


That short sighted notion has been around for many years, and is not
likely to go away soon.
e.g. While in college I applied for a job as a salesman. My interview
went something like this:

Sales-manager 'sell me this pencil."

Me: Not if you don't need the pencil."

Sales-manager: " Can you start tomorrow?"


Wrong answer.

Right answer:** "Sir, I see you have one of our fine pencils.* So, would
you like a special offer for our deluxe sharpener and eraser?"

That gets you the job.


You may have a better answer. My answer worked.

--
PeterN
  #10  
Old January 16th 18, 12:30 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,543
Default The case for "Kaizen", following Fujifilm's Example

On Jan 15, 2018, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 1/14/2018 7:19 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2018-01-14 17:34, PeterN wrote:
On 1/13/2018 11:37 AM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2018.01.13 02:17, RichA wrote:

The problem with business today is the idea that in order to succeed,
you have to have continued growth, meaning you have to make more and
more money, any way you can. We've seen businesses kill themselves
with that attitude, by turning out inferior products or asking users
to pay more and more for essentially the same thing.


The notion that businesses must grow is in part the recycling of
profits toward that growth. Compounding the original investment is
the path to high revenue and return over time.

Unfortunately, with some exceptions, many North American companies
are short term profit growth driven. This takes the eye off the long
term. Further focusing management bonuses on short term objectives
and stock price growth is not exactly beneficial to product
development and quality over time.

That short sighted notion has been around for many years, and is not
likely to go away soon.
e.g. While in college I applied for a job as a salesman. My interview
went something like this:

Sales-manager 'sell me this pencil."

Me: Not if you don't need the pencil."

Sales-manager: " Can you start tomorrow?"


Wrong answer.

Right answer: "Sir, I see you have one of our fine pencils. So, would
you like a special offer for our deluxe sharpener and eraser?"

That gets you the job.


You may have a better answer. My answer worked.


In the context of this thread your answer should have been, “With that
pencil, all you need is the firmware update."

--

Regards,
Savageduck

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is "Fujifilm" an archaic name? John Turco Digital Photography 6 July 26th 17 08:27 AM
"Corset-Boi" Bob "Lionel Lauer" Larter has grown a "pair" and returned to AUK................ \The Great One\ Digital Photography 0 July 14th 09 12:04 AM
FujiFilm F30 "HIGHLY RECOMMENDED" [email protected] Digital Photography 2 November 22nd 06 11:01 AM
[SI] In case you didn't know what "Bokeh" is Al Denelsbeck 35mm Photo Equipment 15 February 22nd 06 01:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.