If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
135mm f/2 'tilt/shift' Nikkor
David Ruether wrote:
Paul Furman wrote: ...modified 135mm f/2 Ai Nikkor... ...examples with a tilt/shift Nikkor 85mm f/2.8 PC Micro: http://www.pbase.com/cameras/nikon/85_28_pc_micro My 135/2 is crap for closeups but then it's not $1,300 either. I am not surprised, as I pointed out years ago in my Nikon evaluation list, at www.donferrario.com/ruether/slemn.html, about the Nikkor 135mm f2 MF, "4.9 beyond about 10', 3 at minimum focus (3)", and, "heavy and large, very sharp center to corner at f2 at mid to long distances but with some very slight field curvature barely detectable [even] at wide stops near infinity; performance is poor near minimum focus at wide stops (both conditions together), otherwise this lens is excellent even wide open". In other words, even within its normal focus range, it is poor as focus approaches its minimum focus (but superb at medium to long focus points). It will never be a good macro lens (at least alone - but it may by chance function better with an achromat on it, though I've never checked this...), unlike the 85mm f2.8 PC, which is designed to be good at close focus. The Canon 500D 2-element +2 diopter closeup lens doesn't do very well either. Unfortunately closeups are the most common use for me although this is pretty interesting. 10' away at 135mm with 1.5x crop is still a face portrait so maybe useful for my plant portraits, and landscapes hand held (3 hands would be useful) in low light. That is the achromat I used successfully on the original Nikkor 80-200mm f2.8, which at 200mm has similar shortcomings to the 135mm f2 at close focus - but that combination was sharp when stopped down some (though it was too cumbersome in practice to get very excited about it - the late 200mm f4 Nikkor was FAR easier to use, and quite good for macro work [tiny insect photo here www.donferrario.com/ruether/200mm-as-macro.htm, at 3X]). The way I have it set up now, there's really no way to put it on a tripod or stop it down, I only checked wide open & I only really ever used it wide open & never found it sharp at any distance so I guess that's why. BTW I found a good price on a mint 85/2.8 TS but I may just pass it along, the tilt & shift are awfully subtle, though I guess the tilts I'm doing with this 135 are beyond reasonableness. The 85/ts only goes to 1/2 life size though I certainly cannot complain about the sharpness, the 105 seems to keep up there. With about 40mm of extension and the +2 diopter the 85 still doesn't quite get to life size. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tilt-shift in action | Cynicor | Digital Photography | 22 | January 30th 07 11:45 PM |
Tilt-Shift Lens: Any Experiences? | Annika1980 | 35mm Photo Equipment | 44 | April 9th 06 06:59 PM |
makeshift tilt/shift plungercam? | Paul Furman | Digital SLR Cameras | 3 | March 17th 06 08:56 PM |
No need for a tilt shift lens. | Scott W | Digital Photography | 48 | November 2nd 05 04:06 AM |
Anyone have experience using 35mm tilt & shift ? | John McGraw | Large Format Photography Equipment | 17 | June 17th 04 01:28 PM |