If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dilemma regarding Digital vs. Film
In article ,
David Dyer-Bennet wrote: (Philip Homburg) writes: In article , David Dyer-Bennet wrote: Wally writes: 3. Is it reasonable to wait (and hope) for a digital databack that will turn this camera into a high end digital camera? My guess: It's not going to happen. *Nobody* has done that for a 35mm body yet. You mean that all those Kodak backs for the 801, F90, F5 (and the one for the F3) are just fiction? Yep. Or at least I've never heard them mentioned by anybody. More info? Go to the Kodak web site and look for obsolete digital cameras. F90 based cameras are the DCS 410, 420, and 460. I think the 660 and 760 are based on the F5. There is also a whole series based on Canon cameras, and there is a 3xx serie based on a Nikon APS camera. Howmany DSLRs do you know with removable finders? Um, 3 or 4 I think. Which ones? Furthermore, it would have to incorporate a full-frame sensor, or else the viewfinder would be wrong, making it completely unsaleable in the current market. Full-frame sensors are still exotic, expensive, high-end items. Again not true. What's not true about it? 'It would have to incorporate a full-frame sensor'. Um, the rapid techonology change seems to me to argue *for* replaceable backs on standard bodies and *against* specialized bodies. I doubt it. You can't do special cameras like the D2H if you are stuck with older mirror/shutter mechanisms. For the price of a 1Ds it should be easy to include a body for free. Large cameras with an integrated motor-drive (such as an F5) are not the ideal cameras for digital backs. Seperate backs will be a good marketing strategy when the market is close the saturation. When people buy your cameras as fast as you can produce them, it is not a good strategy. -- The Electronic Monk was a labor-saving device, like a dishwasher or a video recorder. [...] Video recorders watched tedious television for you, thus saving you the bother of looking at it yourself; Electronic Monks believed things for you, [...] -- Douglas Adams in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|