If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Photographing trademarked items. Photog 1, Mattel 0
Alan Browne writes:
However, the mere presence of a trademark or trademarked item in a photograph does not mean the trademark is being violated. Very true. But many companies seem to want to err on the side of caution, suing for every conceivable infringement. In reality, only uses of a trademark that can cause confusion in the mind of customers or clearly damage the value of the trademark or reputation of its owner are legitimately actionable. But large companies will sue for just about anything. The logic behind this is that, in a society where nothing can be done without a lawyer, and where lawyers start at $100 an hour, and where lawyers charge for every second of their time (even time actually spent by their paralegal staff doing the real work), nobody without extremely deep pockets can even begin to resist a lawsuit. Nothing ever need go to court; a company will simply bankrupt anyone with whom it disagrees by burying it in legal preliminaries. The lawyers will kill off the undesirable. Isn't "claiming" the trademark enough (eg: in magazines the little TM mark appears regualarly)? Not in the U.S. First you must use the trademark regularly and be able to prove that it has value as a trademark; then you can register it. You can assert trademark with the TM, but to register it or defend it, you must be able to show active use of the trademark as a trademark, and active defense of its trademark status. In other countries you can register first and obtain de jure protection of your trademark, though. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|