Workshop with Keith Lazelle

Randall Ainsworth wrote in message . ..

I've done aerial photography in the area a number of times.

Then you know how beautiful the area is, especially for photographers.
Imagine if it weren't so forested and pristine. The Cedar River
watershed provides the drinking water for 1.3 million people in the
area, it's just good government, business, and citizenship to maintain
the watershed in the best condition possible.

And you also know how much logging is going on outside of the
protected forests in National Parks and other areas like the Cedar
River watershed. With almost all of the original old growth forest
outside those areas gone, what areas are left need to be protected for
future generations. We owe that to them.

You tree huggers can just stay up there in the Seattle area and commune
with nature.

At least we have it in the immediate area to enjoy, hike, and
photograph.

--Scott--

Randall Ainsworth wrote in message . ..

I've done aerial photography in the area a number of times.

Then you know how beautiful the area is, especially for photographers.
Imagine if it weren't so forested and pristine. The Cedar River
watershed provides the drinking water for 1.3 million people in the
area, it's just good government, business, and citizenship to maintain
the watershed in the best condition possible.

And you also know how much logging is going on outside of the
protected forests in National Parks and other areas like the Cedar
River watershed. With almost all of the original old growth forest
outside those areas gone, what areas are left need to be protected for
future generations. We owe that to them.

You tree huggers can just stay up there in the Seattle area and commune
with nature.

At least we have it in the immediate area to enjoy, hike, and
photograph.

--Scott--

Randall Ainsworth wrote in message . ..

I've done aerial photography in the area a number of times.

Then you know how beautiful the area is, especially for photographers.
Imagine if it weren't so forested and pristine. The Cedar River
watershed provides the drinking water for 1.3 million people in the
area, it's just good government, business, and citizenship to maintain
the watershed in the best condition possible.

And you also know how much logging is going on outside of the
protected forests in National Parks and other areas like the Cedar
River watershed. With almost all of the original old growth forest
outside those areas gone, what areas are left need to be protected for
future generations. We owe that to them.

You tree huggers can just stay up there in the Seattle area and commune
with nature.

At least we have it in the immediate area to enjoy, hike, and
photograph.

--Scott--

I don't know who this unhappy person is but remarks like the above make me
wonder why he should bother reading this newsgroup. Resorting to such cheap
and clichéd jibes is not the mark of someone interested in its subject matter
(or of an original mind, alas).

The only thing I'm unhappy about is that the environmental whackos have
put lots of people out of work because they value plants and animals
above human beings. I know...I'm right in the middle of spotted owl
country.

I don't know who this unhappy person is but remarks like the above make me
wonder why he should bother reading this newsgroup. Resorting to such cheap
and clichéd jibes is not the mark of someone interested in its subject matter
(or of an original mind, alas).

The only thing I'm unhappy about is that the environmental whackos have
put lots of people out of work because they value plants and animals
above human beings. I know...I'm right in the middle of spotted owl
country.

In article , Scott M. Knowles
wrote:
You tree huggers can just stay up there in the Seattle area and commune
with nature.

I don't know who this unhappy person is but remarks like the above make me
wonder why he should bother reading this newsgroup. Resorting to such cheap
and clichéd jibes is not the mark of someone interested in its subject matter
(or of an original mind, alas).

It also set me wondering what the opposite of "tree hugger" might be.
"Oil-pump humper", perhaps.

Roger

In article , Scott M. Knowles
wrote:
You tree huggers can just stay up there in the Seattle area and commune
with nature.

I don't know who this unhappy person is but remarks like the above make me
wonder why he should bother reading this newsgroup. Resorting to such cheap
and clichéd jibes is not the mark of someone interested in its subject matter
(or of an original mind, alas).

It also set me wondering what the opposite of "tree hugger" might be.
"Oil-pump humper", perhaps.

Roger

In article , Scott M. Knowles
wrote:
You tree huggers can just stay up there in the Seattle area and commune
with nature.

I don't know who this unhappy person is but remarks like the above make me
wonder why he should bother reading this newsgroup. Resorting to such cheap
and clichéd jibes is not the mark of someone interested in its subject matter
(or of an original mind, alas).

It also set me wondering what the opposite of "tree hugger" might be.
"Oil-pump humper", perhaps.

Roger

From: Roger Whitehead

It also set me wondering what the opposite of "tree hugger" might be.
"Oil-pump humper", perhaps.

I'd have guessed "clear cutter"?

From: Roger Whitehead

It also set me wondering what the opposite of "tree hugger" might be.
"Oil-pump humper", perhaps.

I'd have guessed "clear cutter"?