Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
crashing down on the day of 9/11.

The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329

There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report.

Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall speed?

If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the
demolitions industry!

How do we know WTC 7 was demolished?

If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall
from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall.

This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did
so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED
DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT!

PROPOSITION 1:
It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the
ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
Collapse start time: 17 seconds
Collapse end time: 23 seconds
Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds

PROPOSITION 2:
A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6
seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean)
kinematical considerations alone:

Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration *
total time^2

or

s = ut + 1/2at^2
where
s = 174 m (height of building)
u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse)
a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at
a constant)

Thus,
174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2

Solving for t
t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8)
= 5.9590
~ 6 seconds

In article om,
says...
Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
crashing down on the day of 9/11.

The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329

There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report.

Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall speed?

If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the
demolitions industry!

How do we know WTC 7 was demolished?

If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall
from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall.

This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did
so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED
DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT!

PROPOSITION 1:
It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the
ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
Collapse start time: 17 seconds
Collapse end time: 23 seconds
Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds

PROPOSITION 2:
A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6
seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean)
kinematical considerations alone:

Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration *
total time^2

or

s = ut + 1/2at^2
where
s = 174 m (height of building)
u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse)
a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at
a constant)

Thus,
174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2

Solving for t
t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8)
= 5.9590
~ 6 seconds



Since the building actually took over twice that long to collapse, your
"cipherin'" is meaningless, Jethro. In no way did the WTC collapses
resemble a controlled demo.

BDK

BDK wrote:
In article om,
says...
Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
crashing down on the day of 9/11.

The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329

There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report.

Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall speed?

If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the
demolitions industry!

How do we know WTC 7 was demolished?

If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall
from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall.

This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did
so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED
DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT!

PROPOSITION 1:
It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the
ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
Collapse start time: 17 seconds
Collapse end time: 23 seconds
Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds

PROPOSITION 2:
A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6
seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean)
kinematical considerations alone:

Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration *
total time^2

or

s = ut + 1/2at^2
where
s = 174 m (height of building)
u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse)
a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at
a constant)

Thus,
174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2

Solving for t
t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8)
= 5.9590
~ 6 seconds



Since the building actually took over twice that long to collapse, your
"cipherin'" is meaningless, Jethro. In no way did the WTC collapses
resemble a controlled demo.

BDK

WTC7 contained utilities and support for the WTC complex. Emerg. Diesel
Generators, very large storage tanks of fuel etc.

Not your typical Manhattan Office Complex.

--
pj

In article om,
wrote:

Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
crashing down on the day of 9/11.

The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329

There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report.

Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall speed?

Snip

How the hell do think steel is made? The answer is yes.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

wrote:
Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
crashing down on the day of 9/11.

Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined
with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy.

snipped nincompoopery

Truthers are stupid.

Venger

http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...w/1227842.html


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0612152114.htm

wrote:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...w/1227842.html


Popular Mechanics. Wahahahaha........Ladies Home Journal does a nice report
on what really happened too. Wahahahaha.........



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

After solving for your lack of brain matter, you're a genuine moron!

wrote:

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:20:16 -0700, pj wrote:

BDK wrote:
In article om,
says...
Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
crashing down on the day of 9/11.


There's a hell of a lot most of us don't know. But we won't be any wiser
reading your posts, in fact we could finish up knowing even less.
Dave Cohen

On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger wrote:
wrote:
Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
crashing down on the day of 9/11.

Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined
with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy.

snipped nincompoopery

Truthers are stupid.

Venger

Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
see a clip on google video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
According to several websites building 7 collapsed at or around 5:20
pm, just over 6 hours after the first two towers fell. Pretty
impressive demolitions job considering in 6 hours a crew was called up
with materials in hand and rigged that 47 story building to blow.