If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"zxcvbob" wrote in message ... or something else completely? I'll be travelling to Yellowstone and Southern Utah this summer, carrying an old Olympus 6x6 folding camera. It has a red window in the back for the film counter, with a sliding cover (I don't know if any of that makes a difference when using fast film in an old camera.) I want to use fast film so I can use small apertures. If I get any spectactular shots, I'd like to be able to blow them up to 16x20 without getting too grainy. Most of the good pictures are destined to be 8x10's. I'll also have some Kodak Gold 100 film or equivalent with me for full sun situations. Thanks. Best regards, Bob I personnally like the Kodak Portra family of films. But, depending on your subject matter, you might want to consider the "NC" type rather than the "VC". If you're shooting outdoor, sunny landscape type stuff, the "VC" film might be too contrasty. Just my opinion-- YMMV. Also, (my info here may be old or just plain wrong) isn't the 800 speed Portra only available in "UC", ultra contrast? As for the red window in the back, it certainly wouldn't hurt to keep it shut. Possibly, maybe, perhaps, holding the camera in just the right (wrong) way could maybe perhaps allow enough bright midday sun to get thru and fog the film. If it does, the chances are great that it will fog that classic, once-in-a-lifetime shot! IMHO, the best accessory to improve sharpness is a tripod. Of course, if you're using a tripod, you can use a longer shutter speed and even smaller aperature settings. And carrying/setting up a good heavy tripod tends to make you take more care in composing the shot! (Again, just my opinion) -- Ken Hart |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Stacey wrote:
zxcvbob wrote: I have a lightweight tripod, and I use it as a walking stick (folded up and one leg extended.) I've gotten some great pix with my old Ricoh Diacord. The olympus should be a better camera but I haven't gotten as good a pictures using 100 speed film. So I want to choke down the aperture quite a bit and see. By f11 it should be as good as it's going to get. Mine is OK, not as good as a tessar camera (especially a non-front cell focusing one) but better than most old folders are. Most of the front cell focusing lensed folders are kinda weak when shooting at infinity unless shot at f11-f16. Mine is an Olympus "Chrome 6" and has a rather large f/2.8 lens (I don't recall the markings on it) and the owners manual makes a big deal about a tensioner or something in the camera back that hold the film unusually flat to accommodate the wide aperture -- but it is front-cell focused. I should run some of my old film through it at f/8 f/11 and f/16 before the trip and see how sharp it is at infinity. If infinity focus is too soft, I might be better off lugging my old TLR. Is there a different folding camera you can recommend that is tack-sharp at infinity and not too expensive? I don't really need one with a rangefinder or a meter. BTW, I tried some Agfa ASA 50 film a few years ago (in the TLR) and the colors were so saturated it ruined all the pix -- they looked cartoonish. :-P I need to find that roll of negatives and see if I can scan them and tone them down in Photoshop to get usable prints. Best regards, Bob |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Stacey wrote:
zxcvbob wrote: I have a lightweight tripod, and I use it as a walking stick (folded up and one leg extended.) I've gotten some great pix with my old Ricoh Diacord. The olympus should be a better camera but I haven't gotten as good a pictures using 100 speed film. So I want to choke down the aperture quite a bit and see. By f11 it should be as good as it's going to get. Mine is OK, not as good as a tessar camera (especially a non-front cell focusing one) but better than most old folders are. Most of the front cell focusing lensed folders are kinda weak when shooting at infinity unless shot at f11-f16. Mine is an Olympus "Chrome 6" and has a rather large f/2.8 lens (I don't recall the markings on it) and the owners manual makes a big deal about a tensioner or something in the camera back that hold the film unusually flat to accommodate the wide aperture -- but it is front-cell focused. I should run some of my old film through it at f/8 f/11 and f/16 before the trip and see how sharp it is at infinity. If infinity focus is too soft, I might be better off lugging my old TLR. Is there a different folding camera you can recommend that is tack-sharp at infinity and not too expensive? I don't really need one with a rangefinder or a meter. BTW, I tried some Agfa ASA 50 film a few years ago (in the TLR) and the colors were so saturated it ruined all the pix -- they looked cartoonish. :-P I need to find that roll of negatives and see if I can scan them and tone them down in Photoshop to get usable prints. Best regards, Bob |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"zxcvbob" wrote in message
... [SNIP] Is there a different folding camera you can recommend that is tack-sharp at infinity and not too expensive? I don't really need one with a rangefinder or a meter. What's your definition of "not too expensive"? There are older cameras that someone else (like Stacey) could advise you on better than me, but if you are happy with 645, the folding Fujica GS645 is a very nice camera with an awesomely sharp 75mm f3.4 lens. It does have a rangefinder and a meter, and isn't 'cheap' - but you do see them going for not bad prices sometimes. I have one, and like it a lot. I also like the Fujica GS645S with a somewhat wider lens, though that model isn't a folder. Peter |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"zxcvbob" wrote in message
... [SNIP] Is there a different folding camera you can recommend that is tack-sharp at infinity and not too expensive? I don't really need one with a rangefinder or a meter. What's your definition of "not too expensive"? There are older cameras that someone else (like Stacey) could advise you on better than me, but if you are happy with 645, the folding Fujica GS645 is a very nice camera with an awesomely sharp 75mm f3.4 lens. It does have a rangefinder and a meter, and isn't 'cheap' - but you do see them going for not bad prices sometimes. I have one, and like it a lot. I also like the Fujica GS645S with a somewhat wider lens, though that model isn't a folder. Peter |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
zxcvbob wrote:
Stacey wrote: zxcvbob wrote: By f11 it should be as good as it's going to get. Mine is OK, not as good as a tessar camera (especially a non-front cell focusing one) but better than most old folders are. Most of the front cell focusing lensed folders are kinda weak when shooting at infinity unless shot at f11-f16. Mine is an Olympus "Chrome 6" So is mine, I have the f3.5 version. and has a rather large f/2.8 lens (I don't recall the markings on it) and the owners manual makes a big deal about a tensioner or something in the camera back that hold the film unusually flat to accommodate the wide aperture -- but it is front-cell focused. That's the problem. Those front cell focusing lenses are designed to be best at "snap shot" shooting distances i.e. mid range focus points. Stopped down they work OK at infinity. Personally I think the zeiss tessar is about the best of the folder lenses. The color skopar is good but the cameras these were used on leave something to be desired. I do have an old welta folder that has a non-front cell focusing tessar, on a flat bed like a view camera with a coupled rangefinder but they aren't very comon and the bellows on that model ussually need replacing. I should run some of my old film through it at f/8 f/11 and f/16 before the trip and see how sharp it is at infinity. If infinity focus is too soft, I might be better off lugging my old TLR. Is there a different folding camera you can recommend that is tack-sharp at infinity and not too expensive? I don't really need one with a rangefinder or a meter. The 521 6X4.5 ikonta's are pretty good. Should be able to pick up a scale focus tessar sample for around $100 or less and they are about as small as a medium format camera is going to get. Again it's a front cell focus camera (and uncoated lens) but I've had very good results with these again stopped down to f11-f16. The best folder is the later fuji but again they have bellows problems and aren't cheap but perform REALLY good. Another choice is the other 6X4.5 fuji's and they are smaller/better than a TLR would be. BTW I always LOVED the cartoon look of agfa 50! ;-) -- Stacey |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
zxcvbob wrote:
Stacey wrote: zxcvbob wrote: By f11 it should be as good as it's going to get. Mine is OK, not as good as a tessar camera (especially a non-front cell focusing one) but better than most old folders are. Most of the front cell focusing lensed folders are kinda weak when shooting at infinity unless shot at f11-f16. Mine is an Olympus "Chrome 6" So is mine, I have the f3.5 version. and has a rather large f/2.8 lens (I don't recall the markings on it) and the owners manual makes a big deal about a tensioner or something in the camera back that hold the film unusually flat to accommodate the wide aperture -- but it is front-cell focused. That's the problem. Those front cell focusing lenses are designed to be best at "snap shot" shooting distances i.e. mid range focus points. Stopped down they work OK at infinity. Personally I think the zeiss tessar is about the best of the folder lenses. The color skopar is good but the cameras these were used on leave something to be desired. I do have an old welta folder that has a non-front cell focusing tessar, on a flat bed like a view camera with a coupled rangefinder but they aren't very comon and the bellows on that model ussually need replacing. I should run some of my old film through it at f/8 f/11 and f/16 before the trip and see how sharp it is at infinity. If infinity focus is too soft, I might be better off lugging my old TLR. Is there a different folding camera you can recommend that is tack-sharp at infinity and not too expensive? I don't really need one with a rangefinder or a meter. The 521 6X4.5 ikonta's are pretty good. Should be able to pick up a scale focus tessar sample for around $100 or less and they are about as small as a medium format camera is going to get. Again it's a front cell focus camera (and uncoated lens) but I've had very good results with these again stopped down to f11-f16. The best folder is the later fuji but again they have bellows problems and aren't cheap but perform REALLY good. Another choice is the other 6X4.5 fuji's and they are smaller/better than a TLR would be. BTW I always LOVED the cartoon look of agfa 50! ;-) -- Stacey |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kodak discontinues T400CN and Portra 400UC, 400BW; introduces Ultra Color 100, 400, and BW400CN; improves Porta 800 | Peter Lawrence | Film & Labs | 6 | February 19th 04 05:37 PM |
Porta UC - Excellent Film | S. Thomas Lewis | Film & Labs | 4 | November 9th 03 11:24 AM |