|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
August 17th 04, 03:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... Ah, My camera can do 640x480, 1024x768, 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 But 2048x1536 is so big and the images are like 3Mb each!  I tend to take 1600x1200 images Good quality and a reasonable size If size is an issue it is generally agreed that it is better to increase the JPEG compression rather than decrease the resolution. My 3 meg camera can output 2048x1536 at file sizes as low as a few hundred Kb if necessary. Dooey. 
|
|
#32
August 17th 04, 03:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... Ah, My camera can do 640x480, 1024x768, 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 But 2048x1536 is so big and the images are like 3Mb each! I tend to take 1600x1200 images Good quality and a reasonable size If size is an issue it is generally agreed that it is better to increase the JPEG compression rather than decrease the resolution. My 3 meg camera can output 2048x1536 at file sizes as low as a few hundred Kb if necessary. Dooey.
|
|
#33
August 17th 04, 05:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better?
dooey wrote: "Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... Ah, My camera can do 640x480, 1024x768, 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 But 2048x1536 is so big and the images are like 3Mb each! I tend to take 1600x1200 images Good quality and a reasonable size If size is an issue it is generally agreed that it is better to increase the JPEG compression rather than decrease the resolution. My 3 meg camera can output 2048x1536 at file sizes as low as a few hundred Kb if necessary. Dooey.
|
|
#34
August 17th 04, 05:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better?
dooey wrote: "Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... Ah, My camera can do 640x480, 1024x768, 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 But 2048x1536 is so big and the images are like 3Mb each! I tend to take 1600x1200 images Good quality and a reasonable size If size is an issue it is generally agreed that it is better to increase the JPEG compression rather than decrease the resolution. My 3 meg camera can output 2048x1536 at file sizes as low as a few hundred Kb if necessary. Dooey.
|
|
#35
August 17th 04, 06:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes. My 3MP camera makes files well under 1 MB each. My new 6MP camera
makes 3MB jpegs. Dragon Spawn wrote: I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better? dooey wrote: "Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... Ah, My camera can do 640x480, 1024x768, 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 But 2048x1536 is so big and the images are like 3Mb each! I tend to take 1600x1200 images Good quality and a reasonable size If size is an issue it is generally agreed that it is better to increase the JPEG compression rather than decrease the resolution. My 3 meg camera can output 2048x1536 at file sizes as low as a few hundred Kb if necessary. Dooey.
|
|
#36
August 17th 04, 06:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes. My 3MP camera makes files well under 1 MB each. My new 6MP camera
makes 3MB jpegs. Dragon Spawn wrote: I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better? dooey wrote: "Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... Ah, My camera can do 640x480, 1024x768, 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 But 2048x1536 is so big and the images are like 3Mb each! I tend to take 1600x1200 images Good quality and a reasonable size If size is an issue it is generally agreed that it is better to increase the JPEG compression rather than decrease the resolution. My 3 meg camera can output 2048x1536 at file sizes as low as a few hundred Kb if necessary. Dooey.
|
|
#37
August 17th 04, 06:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes. My 3MP camera makes files well under 1 MB each. My new 6MP camera
makes 3MB jpegs. Dragon Spawn wrote: I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better? dooey wrote: "Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... Ah, My camera can do 640x480, 1024x768, 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 But 2048x1536 is so big and the images are like 3Mb each! I tend to take 1600x1200 images Good quality and a reasonable size If size is an issue it is generally agreed that it is better to increase the JPEG compression rather than decrease the resolution. My 3 meg camera can output 2048x1536 at file sizes as low as a few hundred Kb if necessary. Dooey.
|
|
#38
August 17th 04, 08:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better? Yes. You can then always drop the resolution later for normal web/email use but keep it high for photos and exhibition via the web. -- Dooey
|
|
#39
August 17th 04, 08:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better? Yes. You can then always drop the resolution later for normal web/email use but keep it high for photos and exhibition via the web. -- Dooey
|
|
#40
August 17th 04, 08:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better? Yes. You can then always drop the resolution later for normal web/email use but keep it high for photos and exhibition via the web. -- Dooey
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
