If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Loosely wound film in Baldix 12-on
I started photography around 1952 with 120 roll-film, and had no problem
then with the tightness of the exposed film on the take-up spool. (Still got the negatives to prove it!) [Ensign Pocket 20 6x9, Dacora 12-on with f5.6 Subita, & Zeiss Ikonta f4.5 Novar 16-on] A few days ago I ran a 120 Velvia 50 through a camera of that vintage, a mint condition Rangefinder Baldix 6x6cm, and was surprised to find that when I opened the back, the film was loosely wound on the take-up spool. I closed the camera back quickly but as we all know, not quickly enough, and there's fogging on most frames. I've checked the spring loaded metal leaves which are clearly designed to help keep the wound film tight, but I'm reluctant to try increasing the pressure too far, in case I end up with a non-mint camera! The spring loaded leaves on the Baldix seem, if anything, stiffer than the single leaf in my Rolleicord Vb which doesn't suffer from this fault, but does have the exposure counter mechanism pressing on the film in the take-up chamber. Has roll-film got stiffer since the 1950s? And apart from taking my changing bag with me, (which would somewhat spoil the light-weight aspects of this camera's use), how do others deal with the problem? Thanks for any ideas -- M Stewart Milton Keynes, UK http://www.megalith.freeserve.co.uk/oddimage.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Loosely wound film in Baldix 12-on
Malcolm Stewart wrote:
I started photography around 1952 with 120 roll-film, and had no problem then with the tightness of the exposed film on the take-up spool. (Still got the negatives to prove it!) [Ensign Pocket 20 6x9, Dacora 12-on with f5.6 Subita, & Zeiss Ikonta f4.5 Novar 16-on] A few days ago I ran a 120 Velvia 50 through a camera of that vintage, a mint condition Rangefinder Baldix 6x6cm, and was surprised to find that when I opened the back, the film was loosely wound on the take-up spool. I closed the camera back quickly but as we all know, not quickly enough, and there's fogging on most frames. I've checked the spring loaded metal leaves which are clearly designed to help keep the wound film tight, but I'm reluctant to try increasing the pressure too far, in case I end up with a non-mint camera! The spring loaded leaves on the Baldix seem, if anything, stiffer than the single leaf in my Rolleicord Vb which doesn't suffer from this fault, but does have the exposure counter mechanism pressing on the film in the take-up chamber. Has roll-film got stiffer since the 1950s? And apart from taking my changing bag with me, (which would somewhat spoil the light-weight aspects of this camera's use), how do others deal with the problem? Thanks for any ideas Sounds like you didn't get it quite secure on the takeup real when you loaded it. And I take my changing bag everywhere. It weighs hardly anything (no more than an extra T-shirt) and it's saved my butt too many times to leave behind. It also doubles as a dark-cloth when I need that little bit of extra help through the viewfinder. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Loosely wound film in Baldix 12-on
Malcolm Stewart wrote: I started photography around 1952 with 120 roll-film, and had no problem then with the tightness of the exposed film on the take-up spool. (Still got the negatives to prove it!) [Ensign Pocket 20 6x9, Dacora 12-on with f5.6 Subita, & Zeiss Ikonta f4.5 Novar 16-on] A few days ago I ran a 120 Velvia 50 through a camera of that vintage, a mint condition Rangefinder Baldix 6x6cm, and was surprised to find that when I opened the back, the film was loosely wound on the take-up spool. I closed the camera back quickly but as we all know, not quickly enough, and there's fogging on most frames. I've checked the spring loaded metal leaves which are clearly designed to help keep the wound film tight, but I'm reluctant to try increasing the pressure too far, in case I end up with a non-mint camera! The spring loaded leaves on the Baldix seem, if anything, stiffer than the single leaf in my Rolleicord Vb which doesn't suffer from this fault, but does have the exposure counter mechanism pressing on the film in the take-up chamber. Has roll-film got stiffer since the 1950s? And apart from taking my changing bag with me, (which would somewhat spoil the light-weight aspects of this camera's use), how do others deal with the problem? Thanks for any ideas I would say that you need to increase the tension of the spring that pushes on the film to keep it tight on the spool and if it breaks, it breaks. If you don't want to risk it then accept that the camera is past being usable for photography. Maybe you should sell it on. I haven't noticed any change in the stiffness of 120 film over the years. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Upcoming Film Price Wars - Kodak vs. Fuji... | Bob Monaghan | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 63 | October 24th 04 06:07 AM |
Is it Copal or copal? Then what is it? | Nick Zentena | Large Format Photography Equipment | 14 | July 27th 04 03:31 AM |
Help: Newbie 35mm Film Question | Keith | 35mm Photo Equipment | 6 | July 14th 04 06:26 PM |
The first film of the Digital Revolution is here.... | Todd Bailey | Film & Labs | 0 | May 27th 04 08:12 AM |
Road ruts with Jobo | Brian Kosoff | In The Darkroom | 64 | January 27th 04 12:08 AM |