If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated
On 2016-10-23 02:54:29 +0000, Bill W said:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:45:01 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-23 02:27:26 +0000, Bill W said: On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:37:19 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-23 01:07:08 +0000, Bill W said: On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:15:28 -0700, Savageduck wrote: The next time you go out taking photos try wearing a clown outfit. Hmmm. My understanding is that clown suits are temporarily problematic. ;-) ...but just think of all the shots you can get of folks running from you, and of cops running towards you. What shutter speed will capture bullets mid-flight? Here, I shrunk the people in your photo: https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y I wanted to see if I could do it. I used DXO Viewpoint first, but that wasn't enough. I went to PS, then to Transform-Scale, and selected and transformed each of the two r/s windows separately. It came out okay, but I think someone who knows what he's doing could do a pretty good job with this technique. Yup! You compressed the sides a bit which did squeeze them down a tad, but also did a number on the window. Yeah, as I posted that, I looked across the room at the other display with the photo, and saw what a mess the perspective had become. It makes me a little dizzy to look at it. That can happen. For my part, it was an exercise in seeing what I could do to fix the unfixable. Rather than work off my reworked shot, here is the original RAW (as DNG) for you to play with. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8018.dng I'll have to give it a try. I haven't done anything with photography lately. How can there be so many distractions when you're retired? These days I have an open appointment book, so it is great to be able to lose myself in seeing what can be done with my shots, including revisions of shots I believed I was done with years ago. I also have 3 or 4 other shots taken at the same time with less extreme angles and slightly different action from the ladies. The guy remains deadpan throughout his ordeal. I will post some of those later to show some of the sequence. Anyway, here are two other shots from the 2011 sequence at the "Frog & Peach" with less radical perspective correction needed: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8014.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8016.jpg -- Regards, Savageduck |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:45:01 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: On 2016-10-23 02:27:26 +0000, Bill W said: On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:37:19 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-23 01:07:08 +0000, Bill W said: On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:15:28 -0700, Savageduck wrote: The next time you go out taking photos try wearing a clown outfit. Hmmm. My understanding is that clown suits are temporarily problematic. ;-) ...but just think of all the shots you can get of folks running from you, and of cops running towards you. What shutter speed will capture bullets mid-flight? Here, I shrunk the people in your photo: https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y I wanted to see if I could do it. I used DXO Viewpoint first, but that wasn't enough. I went to PS, then to Transform-Scale, and selected and transformed each of the two r/s windows separately. It came out okay, but I think someone who knows what he's doing could do a pretty good job with this technique. Yup! You compressed the sides a bit which did squeeze them down a tad, but also did a number on the window. Rather than work off my reworked shot, here is the original RAW (as DNG) for you to play with. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8018.dng I also have 3 or 4 other shots taken at the same time with less extreme angles and slightly different action from the ladies. The guy remains deadpan throughout his ordeal. I will post some of those later to show some of the sequence. Okay, I tried for the first time working with perspective warp, but also did a little in DXO Viewpoint and LR. I tried to change the perspective to front and center of the 3 windows: https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y It's pretty interesting to see what can be done, but my results are still off, and still make me a little dizzy... |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated
On 2016-10-23 03:44:26 +0000, Bill W said:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:45:01 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-23 02:27:26 +0000, Bill W said: On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:37:19 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-23 01:07:08 +0000, Bill W said: On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:15:28 -0700, Savageduck wrote: The next time you go out taking photos try wearing a clown outfit. Hmmm. My understanding is that clown suits are temporarily problematic. ;-) ...but just think of all the shots you can get of folks running from you, and of cops running towards you. What shutter speed will capture bullets mid-flight? Here, I shrunk the people in your photo: https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y I wanted to see if I could do it. I used DXO Viewpoint first, but that wasn't enough. I went to PS, then to Transform-Scale, and selected and transformed each of the two r/s windows separately. It came out okay, but I think someone who knows what he's doing could do a pretty good job with this technique. Yup! You compressed the sides a bit which did squeeze them down a tad, but also did a number on the window. Rather than work off my reworked shot, here is the original RAW (as DNG) for you to play with. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8018.dng I also have 3 or 4 other shots taken at the same time with less extreme angles and slightly different action from the ladies. The guy remains deadpan throughout his ordeal. I will post some of those later to show some of the sequence. Okay, I tried for the first time working with perspective warp, but also did a little in DXO Viewpoint and LR. I tried to change the perspective to front and center of the 3 windows: https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y It's pretty interesting to see what can be done, but my results are still off, and still make me a little dizzy... I guess that is the point, it is challenging and interesting to see what can be done. The tools we have today are so versatile and powerful, but they are useless unless we exercise our brains and develop techniques for those times we truly need those extra features to create a different, or better image. I feel that as a hobbyist photographer I am constantly climbing the post processing learning curve and there is never a dull moment. Of course, all of that post processing is quite seperate from what is needed to capture the image in the first place. Recognising a subject or scene for its potential, along with initial composition and understanding of exposure criteria is essential, and is probably far more important than choice of camera. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated
In article 2016102219450166771-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-23 02:27:26 +0000, Bill W said: On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:37:19 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-23 01:07:08 +0000, Bill W said: On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:15:28 -0700, Savageduck wrote: The next time you go out taking photos try wearing a clown outfit. Hmmm. My understanding is that clown suits are temporarily problematic. ;-) ...but just think of all the shots you can get of folks running from you, and of cops running towards you. What shutter speed will capture bullets mid-flight? Here, I shrunk the people in your photo: https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y I wanted to see if I could do it. I used DXO Viewpoint first, but that wasn't enough. I went to PS, then to Transform-Scale, and selected and transformed each of the two r/s windows separately. It came out okay, but I think someone who knows what he's doing could do a pretty good job with this technique. Yup! You compressed the sides a bit which did squeeze them down a tad, but also did a number on the window. Rather than work off my reworked shot, here is the original RAW (as DNG) for you to play with. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8018.dng I'll bite. I did a quick and dirty raw2tiff in preview and some adjustments in ViewPoint but no other adjustments: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/...18_DxOVP.jpg?d l=0 I also have 3 or 4 other shots taken at the same time with less extreme angles and slightly different action from the ladies. The guy remains deadpan throughout his ordeal. I will post some of those later to show some of the sequence. -- teleportation kills |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated
In article 2016102209564437304-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-22 16:41:50 +0000, android said: In article 2016102209384396576-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-22 16:32:10 +0000, android said: In article 2016102206152888260-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: Here is the side-by-side comparison, and that tells the manipulation story. Nothing was added or removed, there were some selective color, NR, & exposure adjustments, and a crop to make stuff fit, all done in Lightroom CC. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...enshot_285.jpg And a keystone adjustment that makes the folks in the window look even more overweight... All done in fun. ...but not really a keystone adjustment, it was a horizontal perspective adjustment, just to see what was possible. That would be keystone sideways. Whatever... ;-) Keystone usually implies a vertical perspective issue. Well, I know that but that is what it's called by the DxO, and others i think. You go to France and kill them... And it is the same thing, really. -- teleportation kills |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated
In article 2016102219450166771-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-23 02:27:26 +0000, Bill W said: On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:37:19 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-23 01:07:08 +0000, Bill W said: On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:15:28 -0700, Savageduck wrote: The next time you go out taking photos try wearing a clown outfit. Hmmm. My understanding is that clown suits are temporarily problematic. ;-) ...but just think of all the shots you can get of folks running from you, and of cops running towards you. What shutter speed will capture bullets mid-flight? Here, I shrunk the people in your photo: https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y I wanted to see if I could do it. I used DXO Viewpoint first, but that wasn't enough. I went to PS, then to Transform-Scale, and selected and transformed each of the two r/s windows separately. It came out okay, but I think someone who knows what he's doing could do a pretty good job with this technique. Yup! You compressed the sides a bit which did squeeze them down a tad, but also did a number on the window. Rather than work off my reworked shot, here is the original RAW (as DNG) for you to play with. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8018.dng I'll bite. I did a quick and dirty raw2tiff in preview and some adjustments in ViewPoint but no other adjustments: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/...18_DxOVP.jpg?d l=0 Edit: Screenshot added: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/...18_DxOVPss.jpg ?dl=0 I also have 3 or 4 other shots taken at the same time with less extreme angles and slightly different action from the ladies. The guy remains deadpan throughout his ordeal. I will post some of those later to show some of the sequence. -- teleportation kills |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated
On 2016-10-23 07:15:18 +0000, android said:
In article 2016102219450166771-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-23 02:27:26 +0000, Bill W said: On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:37:19 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-23 01:07:08 +0000, Bill W said: On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:15:28 -0700, Savageduck wrote: The next time you go out taking photos try wearing a clown outfit. Hmmm. My understanding is that clown suits are temporarily problematic. ;-) ...but just think of all the shots you can get of folks running from you, and of cops running towards you. What shutter speed will capture bullets mid-flight? Here, I shrunk the people in your photo: https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y I wanted to see if I could do it. I used DXO Viewpoint first, but that wasn't enough. I went to PS, then to Transform-Scale, and selected and transformed each of the two r/s windows separately. It came out okay, but I think someone who knows what he's doing could do a pretty good job with this technique. Yup! You compressed the sides a bit which did squeeze them down a tad, but also did a number on the window. Rather than work off my reworked shot, here is the original RAW (as DNG) for you to play with. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8018.dng I'll bite. I did a quick and dirty raw2tiff in preview and some adjustments in ViewPoint but no other adjustments: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/mt5dsf0o8rfwmgp/DNC_8018_DxOVP.jpg?dl=0 Edit: Screenshot added: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/die5l8mcdvxcqjj/DNC_8018_DxOVPss.jpg?dl=0 I also have 3 or 4 other shots taken at the same time with less extreme angles and slightly different action from the ladies. The guy remains deadpan throughout his ordeal. I will post some of those later to show some of the sequence. You got practically the same result as Bill with the compression to the windows. Both of you were using DxO ViewPoint, so that was to be expected. The big difference was including the bulletin board on the left. Ultimately, the challenge of working with a shot like that, is exercising the limits of various perspective correction software. ....and it is fun. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated
On 2016-10-23 06:36:00 +0000, android said:
In article 2016102209564437304-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-22 16:41:50 +0000, android said: In article 2016102209384396576-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-22 16:32:10 +0000, android said: In article 2016102206152888260-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: Here is the side-by-side comparison, and that tells the manipulation story. Nothing was added or removed, there were some selective color, NR, & exposure adjustments, and a crop to make stuff fit, all done in Lightroom CC. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...enshot_285.jpg And a keystone adjustment that makes the folks in the window look even more overweight... All done in fun. ...but not really a keystone adjustment, it was a horizontal perspective adjustment, just to see what was possible. That would be keystone sideways. Whatever... ;-) Keystone usually implies a vertical perspective issue. Well, I know that but that is what it's called by the DxO, and others i think. You go to France and kill them... And it is the same thing, really. Aah! That's it, I don't speak French. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated
In article ,
Bill W wrote: On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:37:19 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2016-10-23 01:07:08 +0000, Bill W said: On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:15:28 -0700, Savageduck wrote: The next time you go out taking photos try wearing a clown outfit. Hmmm. My understanding is that clown suits are temporarily problematic. ;-) ...but just think of all the shots you can get of folks running from you, and of cops running towards you. What shutter speed will capture bullets mid-flight? Here, I shrunk the people in your photo: https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y I wanted to see if I could do it. I used DXO Viewpoint first, but that wasn't enough. I went to PS, then to Transform-Scale, and selected and transformed each of the two r/s windows separately. It came out okay, but I think someone who knows what he's doing could do a pretty good job with this technique. Yes... -- teleportation kills |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Corel Manipulated Photography and Digital Art Competition JanuaryWinner | Wayne J. Cosshall | Digital Photography | 0 | February 27th 07 10:11 AM |
Corel Manipulated Photography and Digital Art Competition JanuaryWinner | Wayne J. Cosshall | Digital ZLR Cameras | 0 | February 27th 07 10:11 AM |
Corel Manipulated Photography and Digital Art Competition JanuaryWinner | Wayne J. Cosshall | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | February 27th 07 10:11 AM |
How to Determine The Useful Longest Exposure Time Of A Digital Camera/Back | Einst Stein | Digital Photography | 8 | May 2nd 06 05:09 AM |
Digital images of Mars - Are these manipulated? | Invisible | Digital Photography | 13 | April 30th 05 12:56 AM |