A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old October 23rd 16, 04:21 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated

On 2016-10-23 02:54:29 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:45:01 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:
On 2016-10-23 02:27:26 +0000, Bill W said:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:37:19 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:
On 2016-10-23 01:07:08 +0000, Bill W said:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:15:28 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

The next time you go out taking photos try wearing a clown outfit.

Hmmm. My understanding is that clown suits are temporarily
problematic.

;-)
...but just think of all the shots you can get of folks running from
you, and of cops running towards you.

What shutter speed will capture bullets mid-flight?

Here, I shrunk the people in your photo:
https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y

I wanted to see if I could do it. I used DXO Viewpoint first, but that
wasn't enough. I went to PS, then to Transform-Scale, and selected
and transformed each of the two r/s windows separately. It came out
okay, but I think someone who knows what he's doing could do a pretty
good job with this technique.


Yup! You compressed the sides a bit which did squeeze them down a tad,
but also did a number on the window.


Yeah, as I posted that, I looked across the room at the other display
with the photo, and saw what a mess the perspective had become. It
makes me a little dizzy to look at it.


That can happen. For my part, it was an exercise in seeing what I could
do to fix the unfixable.

Rather than work off my reworked
shot, here is the original RAW (as DNG) for you to play with.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8018.dng


I'll have to give it a try. I haven't done anything with photography
lately. How can there be so many distractions when you're retired?


These days I have an open appointment book, so it is great to be able
to lose myself in seeing what can be done with my shots, including
revisions of shots I believed I was done with years ago.

I also have 3 or 4 other shots taken at the same time with less extreme
angles and slightly different action from the ladies. The guy remains
deadpan throughout his ordeal. I will post some of those later to show
some of the sequence.


Anyway, here are two other shots from the 2011 sequence at the "Frog &
Peach" with less radical perspective correction needed:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8014.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8016.jpg
--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #32  
Old October 23rd 16, 04:44 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Bill W
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,692
Default How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:45:01 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-10-23 02:27:26 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:37:19 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:
On 2016-10-23 01:07:08 +0000, Bill W said:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:15:28 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

The next time you go out taking photos try wearing a clown outfit.

Hmmm. My understanding is that clown suits are temporarily
problematic.

;-)
...but just think of all the shots you can get of folks running from
you, and of cops running towards you.


What shutter speed will capture bullets mid-flight?

Here, I shrunk the people in your photo:
https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y

I wanted to see if I could do it. I used DXO Viewpoint first, but that
wasn't enough. I went to PS, then to Transform-Scale, and selected
and transformed each of the two r/s windows separately. It came out
okay, but I think someone who knows what he's doing could do a pretty
good job with this technique.


Yup! You compressed the sides a bit which did squeeze them down a tad,
but also did a number on the window. Rather than work off my reworked
shot, here is the original RAW (as DNG) for you to play with.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8018.dng

I also have 3 or 4 other shots taken at the same time with less extreme
angles and slightly different action from the ladies. The guy remains
deadpan throughout his ordeal. I will post some of those later to show
some of the sequence.


Okay, I tried for the first time working with perspective warp, but
also did a little in DXO Viewpoint and LR. I tried to change the
perspective to front and center of the 3 windows:
https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y

It's pretty interesting to see what can be done, but my results are
still off, and still make me a little dizzy...
  #33  
Old October 23rd 16, 05:46 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated

On 2016-10-23 03:44:26 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:45:01 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-10-23 02:27:26 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:37:19 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:
On 2016-10-23 01:07:08 +0000, Bill W said:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:15:28 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

The next time you go out taking photos try wearing a clown outfit.

Hmmm. My understanding is that clown suits are temporarily
problematic.

;-)
...but just think of all the shots you can get of folks running from
you, and of cops running towards you.

What shutter speed will capture bullets mid-flight?

Here, I shrunk the people in your photo:
https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y

I wanted to see if I could do it. I used DXO Viewpoint first, but that
wasn't enough. I went to PS, then to Transform-Scale, and selected
and transformed each of the two r/s windows separately. It came out
okay, but I think someone who knows what he's doing could do a pretty
good job with this technique.


Yup! You compressed the sides a bit which did squeeze them down a tad,
but also did a number on the window. Rather than work off my reworked
shot, here is the original RAW (as DNG) for you to play with.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8018.dng

I also have 3 or 4 other shots taken at the same time with less extreme
angles and slightly different action from the ladies. The guy remains
deadpan throughout his ordeal. I will post some of those later to show
some of the sequence.


Okay, I tried for the first time working with perspective warp, but
also did a little in DXO Viewpoint and LR. I tried to change the
perspective to front and center of the 3 windows:
https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y

It's pretty interesting to see what can be done, but my results are
still off, and still make me a little dizzy...


I guess that is the point, it is challenging and interesting to see
what can be done.

The tools we have today are so versatile and powerful, but they are
useless unless we exercise our brains and develop techniques for those
times we truly need those extra features to create a different, or
better image. I feel that as a hobbyist photographer I am constantly
climbing the post processing learning curve and there is never a dull
moment.
Of course, all of that post processing is quite seperate from what is
needed to capture the image in the first place. Recognising a subject
or scene for its potential, along with initial composition and
understanding of exposure criteria is essential, and is probably far
more important than choice of camera.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #34  
Old October 23rd 16, 07:35 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
android
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,854
Default How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated

In article 2016102219450166771-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2016-10-23 02:27:26 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:37:19 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:
On 2016-10-23 01:07:08 +0000, Bill W said:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:15:28 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

The next time you go out taking photos try wearing a clown outfit.

Hmmm. My understanding is that clown suits are temporarily
problematic.

;-)
...but just think of all the shots you can get of folks running from
you, and of cops running towards you.


What shutter speed will capture bullets mid-flight?

Here, I shrunk the people in your photo:
https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y

I wanted to see if I could do it. I used DXO Viewpoint first, but that
wasn't enough. I went to PS, then to Transform-Scale, and selected
and transformed each of the two r/s windows separately. It came out
okay, but I think someone who knows what he's doing could do a pretty
good job with this technique.


Yup! You compressed the sides a bit which did squeeze them down a tad,
but also did a number on the window. Rather than work off my reworked
shot, here is the original RAW (as DNG) for you to play with.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8018.dng


I'll bite. I did a quick and dirty raw2tiff in preview and some
adjustments in ViewPoint but no other adjustments:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/...18_DxOVP.jpg?d
l=0

I also have 3 or 4 other shots taken at the same time with less extreme
angles and slightly different action from the ladies. The guy remains
deadpan throughout his ordeal. I will post some of those later to show
some of the sequence.

--
teleportation kills
  #35  
Old October 23rd 16, 07:36 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
android
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,854
Default How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated

In article 2016102209564437304-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2016-10-22 16:41:50 +0000, android said:

In article 2016102209384396576-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2016-10-22 16:32:10 +0000, android said:

In article 2016102206152888260-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

Here is the side-by-side comparison, and that tells the manipulation
story.
Nothing was added or removed, there were some selective color, NR, &
exposure adjustments, and a crop to make stuff fit, all done in
Lightroom CC.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...enshot_285.jpg


And a keystone adjustment that makes the folks in the window look even
more overweight...

All done in fun.
...but not really a keystone adjustment, it was a horizontal
perspective adjustment, just to see what was possible.


That would be keystone sideways. Whatever...


;-)
Keystone usually implies a vertical perspective issue.


Well, I know that but that is what it's called by the DxO, and others i
think. You go to France and kill them... And it is the same thing,
really.
--
teleportation kills
  #36  
Old October 23rd 16, 08:15 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
android
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,854
Default How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated

In article 2016102219450166771-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2016-10-23 02:27:26 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:37:19 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:
On 2016-10-23 01:07:08 +0000, Bill W said:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:15:28 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

The next time you go out taking photos try wearing a clown outfit.

Hmmm. My understanding is that clown suits are temporarily
problematic.

;-)
...but just think of all the shots you can get of folks running from
you, and of cops running towards you.


What shutter speed will capture bullets mid-flight?

Here, I shrunk the people in your photo:
https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y

I wanted to see if I could do it. I used DXO Viewpoint first, but that
wasn't enough. I went to PS, then to Transform-Scale, and selected
and transformed each of the two r/s windows separately. It came out
okay, but I think someone who knows what he's doing could do a pretty
good job with this technique.


Yup! You compressed the sides a bit which did squeeze them down a tad,
but also did a number on the window. Rather than work off my reworked
shot, here is the original RAW (as DNG) for you to play with.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8018.dng


I'll bite. I did a quick and dirty raw2tiff in preview and some
adjustments in ViewPoint but no other adjustments:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/...18_DxOVP.jpg?d
l=0

Edit: Screenshot added:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/...18_DxOVPss.jpg
?dl=0

I also have 3 or 4 other shots taken at the same time with less extreme
angles and slightly different action from the ladies. The guy remains
deadpan throughout his ordeal. I will post some of those later to show
some of the sequence.

--
teleportation kills
  #37  
Old October 23rd 16, 04:27 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated

On 2016-10-23 07:15:18 +0000, android said:

In article 2016102219450166771-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2016-10-23 02:27:26 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:37:19 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:
On 2016-10-23 01:07:08 +0000, Bill W said:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:15:28 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

The next time you go out taking photos try wearing a clown outfit.

Hmmm. My understanding is that clown suits are temporarily
problematic.

;-)
...but just think of all the shots you can get of folks running from
you, and of cops running towards you.

What shutter speed will capture bullets mid-flight?

Here, I shrunk the people in your photo:
https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y

I wanted to see if I could do it. I used DXO Viewpoint first, but that
wasn't enough. I went to PS, then to Transform-Scale, and selected
and transformed each of the two r/s windows separately. It came out
okay, but I think someone who knows what he's doing could do a pretty
good job with this technique.


Yup! You compressed the sides a bit which did squeeze them down a tad,
but also did a number on the window. Rather than work off my reworked
shot, here is the original RAW (as DNG) for you to play with.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/DNC_8018.dng


I'll bite. I did a quick and dirty raw2tiff in preview and some
adjustments in ViewPoint but no other adjustments:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/mt5dsf0o8rfwmgp/DNC_8018_DxOVP.jpg?dl=0

Edit: Screenshot added:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/die5l8mcdvxcqjj/DNC_8018_DxOVPss.jpg?dl=0

I also have 3 or 4 other shots taken at the same time with less extreme
angles and slightly different action from the ladies. The guy remains
deadpan throughout his ordeal. I will post some of those later to show
some of the sequence.


You got practically the same result as Bill with the compression to the
windows. Both of you were using DxO ViewPoint, so that was to be
expected. The big difference was including the bulletin board on the
left. Ultimately, the challenge of working with a shot like that, is
exercising the limits of various perspective correction software.
....and it is fun.


--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #38  
Old October 23rd 16, 04:28 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated

On 2016-10-23 06:36:00 +0000, android said:

In article 2016102209564437304-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:
On 2016-10-22 16:41:50 +0000, android said:
In article 2016102209384396576-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:
On 2016-10-22 16:32:10 +0000, android said:
In article 2016102206152888260-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

Here is the side-by-side comparison, and that tells the manipulation
story.
Nothing was added or removed, there were some selective color, NR, &
exposure adjustments, and a crop to make stuff fit, all done in
Lightroom CC.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...enshot_285.jpg


And a keystone adjustment that makes the folks in the window look even
more overweight...

All done in fun.
...but not really a keystone adjustment, it was a horizontal
perspective adjustment, just to see what was possible.

That would be keystone sideways. Whatever...


;-)
Keystone usually implies a vertical perspective issue.


Well, I know that but that is what it's called by the DxO, and others i
think. You go to France and kill them... And it is the same thing,
really.


Aah! That's it, I don't speak French.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #39  
Old October 24th 16, 04:57 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
android
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,854
Default How to determine if a digital photograph has been manipulated

In article ,
Bill W wrote:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:37:19 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-10-23 01:07:08 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:15:28 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

The next time you go out taking photos try wearing a clown outfit.

Hmmm. My understanding is that clown suits are temporarily
problematic.


;-)
...but just think of all the shots you can get of folks running from
you, and of cops running towards you.


What shutter speed will capture bullets mid-flight?

Here, I shrunk the people in your photo:
https://www.flickr.com/gp/48982192@N05/91481y

I wanted to see if I could do it. I used DXO Viewpoint first, but that
wasn't enough. I went to PS, then to Transform-Scale, and selected
and transformed each of the two r/s windows separately. It came out
okay, but I think someone who knows what he's doing could do a pretty
good job with this technique.


Yes...
--
teleportation kills
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Corel Manipulated Photography and Digital Art Competition JanuaryWinner Wayne J. Cosshall Digital Photography 0 February 27th 07 10:11 AM
Corel Manipulated Photography and Digital Art Competition JanuaryWinner Wayne J. Cosshall Digital ZLR Cameras 0 February 27th 07 10:11 AM
Corel Manipulated Photography and Digital Art Competition JanuaryWinner Wayne J. Cosshall Digital SLR Cameras 0 February 27th 07 10:11 AM
How to Determine The Useful Longest Exposure Time Of A Digital Camera/Back Einst Stein Digital Photography 8 May 2nd 06 05:09 AM
Digital images of Mars - Are these manipulated? Invisible Digital Photography 13 April 30th 05 12:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.