If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
http://www.imaging-resource.com has got a "Beta" of the 7D2 and posted
jpegs of their test targets in their camera "comperometer". Here's a screen capture of the 7D2 vs the D7100 at ISO 6400... The Canon's on the left: http://tinyurl.com/mhpwv5m I'm a RAW kind of guy but it's a preview. "Half frame" fanatics should be ecstatic! -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article , android wrote:
http://www.imaging-resource.com has got a "Beta" of the 7D2 and posted jpegs of their test targets in their camera "comperometer". Here's a screen capture of the 7D2 vs the D7100 at ISO 6400... The Canon's on the left: http://tinyurl.com/mhpwv5m I'm a RAW kind of guy but it's a preview. "Half frame" fanatics should be ecstatic! Yeah, like I said - the 7D is trounced by the D7100, and you wanted to compare it to the D750, where it would be obliterated. ISO6400 is Max ISO for the D7100 and the 7D goes one step further, yet at 6400 the 7D doesn't really look that much better. A pity, why can't Canon handle image noise as good as Nikon? -- Sandman[.net] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article ,
Sandman wrote: In article , android wrote: http://www.imaging-resource.com has got a "Beta" of the 7D2 and posted jpegs of their test targets in their camera "comperometer". Here's a screen capture of the 7D2 vs the D7100 at ISO 6400... The Canon's on the left: http://tinyurl.com/mhpwv5m I'm a RAW kind of guy but it's a preview. "Half frame" fanatics should be ecstatic! Yeah, like I said - the 7D is trounced by the D7100, and you wanted to compare it to the D750, where it would be obliterated. It's still 7D2 and as anybody can se: It's not obliterated by the D7100. It's an interesting ISO since that's what many "action oriented" photogs wanna be. ISO6400 is Max ISO for the D7100 and the 7D goes one step further, yet at 6400 the 7D doesn't really look that much better. A pity, why can't Canon handle image noise as good as Nikon? The 7D2 does better than the D7100, IMNHO... -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article ,
Sandman wrote: In article , android wrote: http://www.imaging-resource.com has got a "Beta" of the 7D2 and posted jpegs of their test targets in their camera "comperometer". Here's a screen capture of the 7D2 vs the D7100 at ISO 6400... The Canon's on the left: http://tinyurl.com/mhpwv5m I'm a RAW kind of guy but it's a preview. "Half frame" fanatics should be ecstatic! Yeah, like I said - the 7D is trounced by the D7100, and you wanted to compare it to the D750, where it would be obliterated. It's still 7D2 and as anybody can se: It's not obliterated by the D7100. It's an interesting ISO since that's where many "action oriented" photogs wanna be. ISO6400 is Max ISO for the D7100 and the 7D goes one step further, yet at 6400 the 7D doesn't really look that much better. A pity, why can't Canon handle image noise as good as Nikon? The 7D2 does better than the D7100, IMNSHO... -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article , android wrote:
android: http://www.imaging-resource.com has got a "Beta" of the 7D2 and posted jpegs of their test targets in their camera "comperometer". Here's a screen capture of the 7D2 vs the D7100 at ISO 6400... The Canon's on the left: http://tinyurl.com/mhpwv5m I'm a RAW kind of guy but it's a preview. "Half frame" fanatics should be ecstatic! Sandman: Yeah, like I said - the 7D is trounced by the D7100, and you wanted to compare it to the D750, where it would be obliterated. It's still 7D2 and as anybody can se: It's not obliterated by the D7100 Yeah, it is. Sandman: ISO6400 is Max ISO for the D7100 and the 7D goes one step further, yet at 6400 the 7D doesn't really look that much better. A pity, why can't Canon handle image noise as good as Nikon? The 7D2 does better than the D7100, IMNSHO... Why can't you read? The 7D is *slightly* better, which is a clear win for the $600 cheaper, smaller, lighter D7100 that has better battery life, higher resolution and better LCD screen. Like I said: Sandman Who's the winner? 09/17/2014 "Uh, the D7100 beats the 7D in most areas. The 7D has slightly better ISO performance and shoots at 10fps compared to 6fps for the D7100, other than that, it's utterly trounced." It has slightly better ISO, and now we see what that gives. Not much. Not $600 worth of better ISO, and since the D7100 totally owns the 7D in every other aspect, it's not even a fair comparison to the old D7100. In order for the 7D to look god, we need to go even lower-end on the Nikon side. -- Sandman[.net] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article ,
Sandman wrote: Why can't you read? The 7D is *slightly* better The thread is still about the 7D2 and D7100. Not the 7D and whatever... -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article , android wrote:
In article , Sandman: Why can't you read? The 7D is *slightly* better The thread is still about the 7D2 and D7100. Not the 7D and whatever... It's all you've got, troll. I've been talking about the Mark II the entire time. I just think Canon's naming scheme is stupid. It's the new version of the 7D. Focus on irrelevant things instead of staying focused on facts, Android. -- Sandman[.net] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article , Sandman
wrote: I've been talking about the Mark II the entire time. I just think Canon's naming scheme is stupid. That makes sense. Except that if one reads that what you actually has written... It's Canon's fault that you behave stupidly??? You can compare most of the features between the two he http://tinyurl.com/np6z9qf That the Canon has a RAW buffer of 30 captures is indicated he http://tinyurl.com/ogz98fx All while the Nikons buffer seem to 6 ditto, if you believe this: http://tinyurl.com/phrjoy9 That the Canon produces better jpegs at high ISO has already been shown he http://www.imaging-resource.com Screen shoot for your convenience he http://tinyurl.com/mhpwv5m The Canon is on the left. Not that I would expect you to read nor understand any of this, but other folks might be interested.... -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article , android wrote:
In article , Sandman Sandman: I've been talking about the Mark II the entire time. I just think Canon's naming scheme is stupid. That makes sense. Except that if one reads that what you actually has written... It's Canon's fault that you behave stupidly??? You can compare most of the features between the two he http://tinyurl.com/np6z9qf That the Canon has a RAW buffer of 30 captures is indicated he http://tinyurl.com/ogz98fx All while the Nikons buffer seem to 6 ditto, if you believe this: http://tinyurl.com/phrjoy9 That the Canon produces better jpegs at high ISO has already been shown he http://www.imaging-resource.com Screen shoot for your convenience he http://tinyurl.com/mhpwv5m The Canon is on the left. Not that I would expect you to read nor understand any of this, but other folks might be interested.... My god you're dumb. This is what I wrote in my first post about the 7D vs the D7100: Sandman Who's the winner? 09/17/2014 "Uh, the D7100 beats the 7D in most areas. The 7D has slightly better ISO performance and shoots at 10fps compared to 6fps for the D7100, other than that, it's utterly trounced." I.e. I was already well aware of the two small advantages the 7D has, and seeing how small the difference is with ISO, it's really just one advantage. -- Sandman[.net] |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article , Sandman
wrote: In article , android wrote: In article , Sandman Sandman: I've been talking about the Mark II the entire time. I just think Canon's naming scheme is stupid. That makes sense. Except that if one reads that what you actually has written... It's Canon's fault that you behave stupidly??? You can compare most of the features between the two he http://tinyurl.com/np6z9qf That the Canon has a RAW buffer of 30 captures is indicated he http://tinyurl.com/ogz98fx All while the Nikons buffer seem to 6 ditto, if you believe this: http://tinyurl.com/phrjoy9 That the Canon produces better jpegs at high ISO has already been shown he http://www.imaging-resource.com Screen shoot for your convenience he http://tinyurl.com/mhpwv5m The Canon is on the left. Not that I would expect you to read nor understand any of this, but other folks might be interested.... My god you're dumb. This is what I wrote in my first post about the 7D vs the D7100: Sandman Who's the winner? 09/17/2014 "Uh, the D7100 beats the 7D in most areas. The 7D has slightly better ISO performance and shoots at 10fps compared to 6fps for the D7100, other than that, it's utterly trounced." I.e. I was already well aware of the two small advantages the 7D has, and seeing how small the difference is with ISO, it's really just one advantage. Almost twice the frame rate, five times the RAW buffer and clearly better high ISO. That's what action photogs want. I'd say that's it not the 7D2 thats humiliated. It's the poster that confuses it with a five year old camera. -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400 | android | Digital Photography | 196 | November 18th 14 08:37 AM |
Nikon new release D7100 | Rob | Digital Photography | 159 | March 15th 13 11:09 AM |
6400 on the D3? How about 12,800 on a little P&S? | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | January 24th 08 08:29 PM |