A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Please check my calculations for flash photography



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 25th 04, 07:36 PM
mcgyverjones
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Please check my calculations for flash photography


"zxcvar" wrote in message
m...
Greetings! I shall be grateful if some one checks my calculations for
an external flash. A flash has a guide number of 92 at ISO 100. My
Dx6490 has f number of 3.7 at telephoto end. So the flash can light up
to 92 divided by 3.7, which is equal to 24.86 feet. If I use ISO 400,
then it will illuminate upto 24.86 times 2 =49.72 feet. Is this
calculation seems right to you? I need to use the flash to photograph
my daughter at school functions. She will be 30 to 40 feet away from
me. With thanks.


Is this "alt.photo.retro"?? Who's bothered with guide numbers since the
70's??


  #2  
Old July 25th 04, 08:00 PM
jimkramer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Please check my calculations for flash photography

"mcgyverjones" wrote in message
.. .

"zxcvar" wrote in message
m...
Greetings! I shall be grateful if some one checks my calculations for
an external flash. A flash has a guide number of 92 at ISO 100. My
Dx6490 has f number of 3.7 at telephoto end. So the flash can light up
to 92 divided by 3.7, which is equal to 24.86 feet. If I use ISO 400,
then it will illuminate upto 24.86 times 2 =49.72 feet. Is this
calculation seems right to you? I need to use the flash to photograph
my daughter at school functions. She will be 30 to 40 feet away from
me. With thanks.


Is this "alt.photo.retro"?? Who's bothered with guide numbers since the
70's??

If you are using a flash in a manual mode you need to know the guide number.
Bet you got a real fancy camera?

Jim


  #3  
Old July 25th 04, 08:15 PM
Robertwgross
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Please check my calculations for flash photography

zxcvar wrote:
Greetings! I shall be grateful if some one checks my calculations for
an external flash. A flash has a guide number of 92 at ISO 100. My
Dx6490 has f number of 3.7 at telephoto end. So the flash can light up
to 92 divided by 3.7, which is equal to 24.86 feet. If I use ISO 400,
then it will illuminate upto 24.86 times 2 =49.72 feet. Is this
calculation seems right to you? I need to use the flash to photograph
my daughter at school functions. She will be 30 to 40 feet away from
me. With thanks.


Be careful. Some guide numbers are in meters and some are in feet. That will
throw off your calculations. Most are for ISO 100.

---Bob Gross---
  #4  
Old July 25th 04, 08:17 PM
Al Denelsbeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Please check my calculations for flash photography

(zxcvar) wrote in
m:

Greetings! I shall be grateful if some one checks my calculations for
an external flash. A flash has a guide number of 92 at ISO 100. My
Dx6490 has f number of 3.7 at telephoto end. So the flash can light up
to 92 divided by 3.7, which is equal to 24.86 feet. If I use ISO 400,
then it will illuminate upto 24.86 times 2 =49.72 feet. Is this
calculation seems right to you? I need to use the flash to photograph
my daughter at school functions. She will be 30 to 40 feet away from
me. With thanks.


You're correct, the calculations have been done right. It should be
noted, however, that flashes don't always put out what the GN claims,
especially if they're older, so testing it would be better.

You might also consider changing the ISO, rather than the aperture,
as she gets closer to you - this will improve quality. At 35 feet you can
switch to ISO 200, f3.7.

And if you want to get really creative, there are little credit-card
sized magnifiers available at office supply stores. They are flat plastic
fresnel lenses - the same kind you have in front of the flash tube. Rig one
about six inches in front of the flash head, and you've just extended the
flash reach (but a much narrower beam) by a considerable margin. With the
DX6490, this could help a lot, and the narrower field of view at the
telephoto end shouldn't be affected by the narrow flash coverage. But you'd
need to do some tests to determine how much light increase you get.

Good luck!


- Al.

--
To reply, insert dash in address to separate G and I in the domain
  #5  
Old July 25th 04, 08:17 PM
Al Denelsbeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Please check my calculations for flash photography

(zxcvar) wrote in
m:

Greetings! I shall be grateful if some one checks my calculations for
an external flash. A flash has a guide number of 92 at ISO 100. My
Dx6490 has f number of 3.7 at telephoto end. So the flash can light up
to 92 divided by 3.7, which is equal to 24.86 feet. If I use ISO 400,
then it will illuminate upto 24.86 times 2 =49.72 feet. Is this
calculation seems right to you? I need to use the flash to photograph
my daughter at school functions. She will be 30 to 40 feet away from
me. With thanks.


You're correct, the calculations have been done right. It should be
noted, however, that flashes don't always put out what the GN claims,
especially if they're older, so testing it would be better.

You might also consider changing the ISO, rather than the aperture,
as she gets closer to you - this will improve quality. At 35 feet you can
switch to ISO 200, f3.7.

And if you want to get really creative, there are little credit-card
sized magnifiers available at office supply stores. They are flat plastic
fresnel lenses - the same kind you have in front of the flash tube. Rig one
about six inches in front of the flash head, and you've just extended the
flash reach (but a much narrower beam) by a considerable margin. With the
DX6490, this could help a lot, and the narrower field of view at the
telephoto end shouldn't be affected by the narrow flash coverage. But you'd
need to do some tests to determine how much light increase you get.

Good luck!


- Al.

--
To reply, insert dash in address to separate G and I in the domain
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Digital Imaging vs. (Digital and Film) Photography Bob Monaghan Medium Format Photography Equipment 9 June 19th 04 05:48 PM
Books on Composition, developing an "Eye"? William J. Slater General Photography Techniques 9 April 7th 04 04:22 PM
Fuji S2 and Metz 44 Mz-2 Flash elchief In The Darkroom 3 April 7th 04 10:20 AM
Fuji S2 and Metz 44 Mz-2 Flash elchief Photographing People 3 April 7th 04 10:20 AM
Study Photography in Venice Venice School of Photography Fine Art, Framing and Display 0 February 13th 04 06:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.