A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Little review of the Olympus RC



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 27th 04, 01:15 AM
Mike Henley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Little review of the Olympus RC

Just got the Olympus RC..


POSITIVES...
very solid metal build quality; apart from the lens glass breaking I
can't see what harm can come to this camera. I have always been
puzzled by people who complained about the "plasticky" feel of the
Minox compared to the Rollei 35, but if the Rollei 35 (never handled
one) is like the Olympus RC then I understand now.

Can see both aperture and shutter settings in viewfinder.

Fully mechanical feel and operation. Fully manual operation including
aperture, focus, shutter and ASA.

B shutter mode and ability to use standard cable release. I have liked
the night photos that the olympus XA took with its meter and aperture
control automation.

Looks beautiful. Nice minimalist retro looks.
http://tuaupe.50megs.com/images/olympus_35rc.jpg



NEGATIVES...

uses mercury battery which is no longer available, not sure if
replacements are adequate. The batteries though are only needed for
the meter.

If you're used to the XA this is a considerably bigger camera and not
really as pocketable. I'm not sure that it's much smaller or lighter
than a pentax zx/mz-m. I am horrified though by the size of the
Yashica Electro 35 GSN compared to the Olympus RC.
http://www.barefoot.idv.tw/img_about...tro35_35rc.jpg

Over the XA, the RC offers a more solid build and a fully manual
override. Maybe also a slightly more professional impression as I can
only guess not many people below a certain age have commonly seen this
camera. Same can be said for the XA but the XA decidedly looks P&S or
like a little toy. Does anyone know if the Olympus RC has better
optics than the Olympus XA? The XA is certainly easier to use and more
pocketable, and somewhat cuter or more adorable.

This is my main complaint about it though, the aperture dial on the
lens is a little hard to turn ergonomically. Quite hard actually for
regular use, compared to the Minox or the XA. I think this is a camera
that probably encourages setting the aperture to a certain value and
varying the shutter speed, which is a little confusing for "sunny 16"
but probably makes sense. The shutter dial though is quite nice.


P.S. How does the Rollei 35 compare to the Olympus RC and the XA in
size? is it in between the two? to which is it closer?
Also, What camera comparable to the RC has the best optics with a
rangefinder and full manual? Does the Minolta 7sII have a better lens?
  #2  
Old June 27th 04, 02:32 AM
russbutner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Little review of the Olympus RC

Mike

Contact me, off-group. I'll give you the scoop on the Oly RC, and many more
rangefinder's.

QLP
  #3  
Old June 27th 04, 02:57 PM
Leonard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Little review of the Olympus RC

Mike Henley wrote:

P.S. How does the Rollei 35 compare to the Olympus RC and the XA in
size? is it in between the two? to which is it closer?


I have a 35 and an XA:
http://www.pbase.com/len04/compacts

The XA is fractionally smaller than the Rollei, but is much more
pocketable owing to its lack of protruding bits when closed up.
When ready-to-shoot the Rollei appears quite a bit bigger because
its lens has to be pulled out to 40mm from the film plane - the XA
has a telephoto design.

- Len
  #4  
Old July 1st 04, 08:02 PM
Gordon Moat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Little review of the Olympus RC

Mike Henley wrote:

Just got the Olympus RC..


. . . . . . . . .

NEGATIVES...

uses mercury battery which is no longer available, not sure if
replacements are adequate. The batteries though are only needed for
the meter.


Check EBAY. There are a few solutions, depending upon what battery you
need.


If you're used to the XA this is a considerably bigger camera and not
really as pocketable. I'm not sure that it's much smaller or lighter
than a pentax zx/mz-m. I am horrified though by the size of the
Yashica Electro 35 GSN compared to the Olympus RC.
http://www.barefoot.idv.tw/img_about...tro35_35rc.jpg


Yeah, the Yashica is a tank of a camera. I have two Yashica GT cameras. I
even think these might be heavier than a few SLRs with a similar lens
mounted.


Over the XA, the RC offers a more solid build and a fully manual
override.


Manual override is nice to have, and something that I miss on the Yashica
GT.

Maybe also a slightly more professional impression as I can
only guess not many people below a certain age have commonly seen this
camera. Same can be said for the XA but the XA decidedly looks P&S or
like a little toy. Does anyone know if the Olympus RC has better
optics than the Olympus XA? The XA is certainly easier to use and more
pocketable, and somewhat cuter or more adorable.

This is my main complaint about it though, the aperture dial on the
lens is a little hard to turn ergonomically. Quite hard actually for
regular use, compared to the Minox or the XA. I think this is a camera
that probably encourages setting the aperture to a certain value and
varying the shutter speed, which is a little confusing for "sunny 16"
but probably makes sense. The shutter dial though is quite nice.


It could be the age of the camera, and some wear, affect the feel of the
controls.



P.S. How does the Rollei 35 compare to the Olympus RC and the XA in
size? is it in between the two? to which is it closer?


Pretty close in size, though the controls on the Rollei 35 are different.
Ergonomics might be a bigger issue than just size.


Also, What camera comparable to the RC has the best optics with a
rangefinder and full manual? Does the Minolta 7sII have a better lens?


I think there was a Minolta 9, or similar number identification, that you
might want to compare. Overall, there are more Canon and Yashica
rangefinders in some locations, or on EBAY, though if you look long
enough, you can find the other types. There was also a Konica S3 that was
well regarded, though it is tough to find, and costs more than some
others.

Ciao!

Gordon Moat
A G Studio
http://www.allgstudio.com
http://www.agstudiopro.com Coming Soon!



  #5  
Old July 1st 04, 10:11 PM
Sabineellen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Little review of the Olympus RC

There was also a Konica S3 that was
well regarded, though it is tough to find, and costs more than some
others.


Hi Gordon,

Isn't the Konica S3 a fully automatic camera? I really like that the Olympus RC
is a fully manual camera.
  #6  
Old July 2nd 04, 04:42 AM
Gordon Moat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Little review of the Olympus RC

Sabineellen wrote:

There was also a Konica S3 that was
well regarded, though it is tough to find, and costs more than some
others.


Hi Gordon,

Isn't the Konica S3 a fully automatic camera?


Actually, shutter priority. I thought it would be good to mention it, since you
are looking into older rangefinder cameras. It is a compact, high quality
rangefinder, with a fairly nice lens.

I really like that the Olympus RC
is a fully manual camera.


Fully manual control is definitely useful in many situations. Of course, the
obvious solution would be an old Leica, or Nikon rangefinder, though a good
example of either of those would cost more than ten fixed lens rangefinder
cameras.

Good luck in the hunting for other cameras.

Ciao!

Gordon Moat
A G Studio
http://www.allgstudio.com
http://www.agstudiopro.com Coming Soon!

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stabilization Effectiveness Canon S1 IS vs Olympus 2100UZ? nesredep egrob Digital Photography 5 July 12th 04 04:02 AM
Olympus C-740 and Win98 version 1 James M Digital Photography 2 June 29th 04 12:57 PM
Should I upgrade from my Olympus D-460 Kayla Digital Photography 3 June 29th 04 05:20 AM
rust in classic camera + olympus RC batteries Mike Henley 35mm Photo Equipment 0 June 24th 04 03:36 PM
Olympus RC vs Rollei 35 Mike Henley 35mm Photo Equipment 11 June 18th 04 10:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.