|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
June 18th 04, 08:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
MF costs more cuz its much better ;-)
How has Fuji duped people into thinking that Frontier prints are the "gold"
standard of digitial printing? Inkjets look better. Neil Gould wrote: That depends on how they're printed. A 20"x20" Frontier print doesn't cost much. An optical print does, at least around here. If you only consider the cost of materials, there wouldn't be much difference. But, labor is significantly different between these two methods. But then, so are the results. Neil 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Formula for pre-focusing | Steve Yeatts | Large Format Photography Equipment | 9 | June 22nd 04 02:55 AM |
| zone system test with filter on lens? | Phil Lamerton | In The Darkroom | 35 | June 4th 04 02:40 AM |
Threaded Mode