A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » General Photography » Film & Labs
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

are Kodak 160VC and 400VC a good choice?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 14th 03, 11:16 AM
Carlo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default are Kodak 160VC and 400VC a good choice?

are Kodak 160VC and 400VC a good choice?
  #2  
Old October 14th 03, 05:05 PM
Michael Scarpitti
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default are Kodak 160VC and 400VC a good choice?

(Carlo) wrote in message . com...
are Kodak 160VC and 400VC a good choice?


Are Barolo and Barbera a good choice?

It depends on what you are doing with them, doesn't it?
  #4  
Old October 15th 03, 02:44 PM
Mr 645
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default are Kodak 160VC and 400VC a good choice?

are Kodak 160VC and 400VC a good choice?


They are excellent films for certain needs but will probably deliver poor
results for other needs
http://www.jonlayephotography.com
  #5  
Old October 15th 03, 07:26 PM
Bill Tuthill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default are Kodak 160VC and 400VC a good choice?

Carlo wrote:

Yes, Sorry... I wanted to listen to different tips...
I have to make to types of pictures:
1) Buildings, achitecture (maybe not good conditiuons of light)
2) People, People inside their houses (light of ambience... no flash)
Maybe Kodak 160VC and 400VC are good for people... not for buildings...


Portra 400VC is very grainy for a 35mm film, but if you are shooting
4x5 sheet film, it's one of few choices. For architecture I recommend
Portra 400UC (ultracolor) instead. It is less grainy than Portra 160VC,
significantly less grainy than 400VC, and works well in overcast weather.
For people I recommend Portra 160NC, or if you have medium format, 400NC.
NC is an excellent low-contrast film with more-neutral skin tones than
Fuji NPS and lower contrast than Fuji NPH.

  #6  
Old October 21st 03, 04:55 AM
Frank Pittel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default are Kodak 160VC and 400VC a good choice?

Carlo wrote:
: are Kodak 160VC and 400VC a good choice?

I used to use Portra 160vc. I have since switched to Fuji's NPS160.
I don't have any problem with Portra but just prefer the Fuji. Of
course I switched to Fuji at the time I was upset with Kodak for
discontinuing their Royal Gold 100.
--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.