If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Congrats to the FSLAP
On 16/08/2012 5:38 AM, Rasta Khan wrote:
Its about time! The FNVW Triumvirate consists of Phoenix, Nadegda, and myself. Your first day here (in your current visit; I assume not your first visit) and you're already bucking for a Tinfoil Sombrero? Things are not looking good for you. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Congrats to the FSLAP
Rasta Khan, in did thusly write:
On 8/16/2012 2:00 PM, kensi wrote: On 16/08/2012 5:38 AM, Rasta Khan wrote: Its about time! The FNVW Triumvirate consists of Phoenix, Nadegda, and myself. Your first day here (in your current visit; I assume not your first visit) and you're already bucking for a Tinfoil Sombrero? Things are not looking good for you. Got mine many years ago. Its not repeatable. When the Triumvirate staged their coup and took over AUK, all previous awards were negated, each person being required to justify themselves to the New Cabal. If they proved themselves kooks, their old kook awards stood as awarded. If they proved themselves non-kooks, their previous awards were absolved. For kookologists, the same applied. If they proved themselves to be kooks, their previous meritorious awards were stripped from them. Because the previous management used the kook awards as a means of revenge against those who stood up to their stalking, outer-filthing, harassing, defaming, libeling ways, it could not be ascertained that any given person actually *deserved* their awards, so we started tabula rasa. -- /\ Properly known as James \ /\ THERE IS NO CABAL -- LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL \/ \ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more. Kook Awards Official Voting Ballot: Message-ID: https://groups.google.com/group/alt....b5cf6d6cb202b5 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Congrats to the FSLAP
On 17/08/2012 12:25 AM, Rasta Khan wrote:
On 8/16/2012 10:26 PM, [Tor] Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Three} wrote: sniggle Sour grapes, hah Lionel? Who is "Lionel", Khan? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Congrats to the FSLAP
"Rasta Khan" wrote in message
... On 8/16/2012 10:26 PM, [Tor] Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Three} wrote: Rasta Khan, in did thusly write: Froups snecked. On 8/16/2012 9:18 PM, [Tor] Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Three} wrote: Rasta Khan, in did thusly write: Froups snecked. On 8/16/2012 6:04 PM, [Tor] Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Three} wrote: If they proved themselves non-kooks, their previous awards were absolved. I guess that means mine are still valid! So, you're admitting you became the useful idiot for a kook in the midst of an epic meltdown (ie: Fred Hall) when you didn't need to. Did Fred promise you a repeal of all your kook awards? Did he play upon your wide-eyed gullibility by stipulating that you'd become a member of his 'in' crowd (of which there are scarcely any members left) were you to come back to usenet and fight the fight he cannot, to take the whuppings he is too much of a coward to bear? What excuse did he use? By your congratulatory initial post, I'd surmise that he claimed he was getting married or something... did they finally legalize marriage between humans and ruminants in Texas? Don't you feel foolish now that you've supped upon his yeasty crotch with such loving abandon? You've not been deemed or voted a kook yet. There is still time, and hope, for you yet. A change of allegiances would do you wonders, though, as well as would judicious snecking from your Froups: line. BwaHAHAhahaaAA! LONG L1VE FRED HALL! MAY HIS NUTSACK BE FOREVER FERTILE! His nutsack shall remain fertile for the yeast infection growing there. At least until he takes a bath, which will be... ok, forever fertile it is, then. sniggle I'm callin' troll. Nice technique though! PS. Just a little over the top. That's how I started out t00, so don't feel bad. Practice makes purrfect! ) Smart fellow. Back away slowly and act placatingly amiable, maybe the monster in your midst won't squash you like a bug before you can scramble to safety. sniggle Sour grapes, hah Lionel? He juss likes to threaten people that he barely knows. Kinda like Emmett. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Congrats to the FSLAP
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 01:04:17 -0400, Rasta Khan wrote:
On 8/17/2012 12:58 AM, kensi wrote: On 17/08/2012 12:25 AM, Rasta Khan wrote: On 8/16/2012 10:26 PM, [Tor] Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Three} wrote: sniggle Sour grapes, hah Lionel? Who is "Lionel", Khan? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. Typical Lionel response. You give more away with each post. Nice try. Are you on crack? That wasn't even Phoenix, let alone your "Lionel", and if it's a typical anyone response it's actually a typical tholen response, used ironically by kensi. This is the first time you didn't sneck the photo groups. This is one of the first times kensi ever responsed to any of your drivel. Why did you *add* the photo groups, for that matter? None of this appears to be relevant there. Seems rather ... kooky. Until now you snecked them with every response. I'm not aware that kensi snecked anything on any of the few occasions she responded to your posts. In fact, a little grepping in my local archive of auk finds a grand total of 4 responses to you by kensi, and *none* of them had any changes to the newsgroup list compared to the parent article. Looks like you're hallucinating. You might want to get that checked out by a doctor. Only Lionel has ever done that to me on Usenet. Well, there's a second time for everything. Except your death, I suppose. Couple that with the sig, Lionel's taste short but bold. So, everyone with a sig that conforms to netiquette (four lines or so max) is the same person? Yeesh, and I thought Account Banned was kooky for his belief that everyone at a large regional ISP, one whose financial statements to the govt indicate it to have three million customers, are sockpuppets of a single person. This particular form of paranoia must be especially common in netkooks. Interesting. Even though your trolling ability is sophomoric at best, your flaming ability, OTOH, is top notch. Kensi's trolling ability is poor because kensi is not a troll. But yes, her flaming ability *is* top notch. You'll probably be learning that firsthand very soon, whenever she sees your latest stupid post in response to her. That's Lionel in a nutshell. ( PING: Co-FNVWs. Opinions, please, on the truth or falsity of this: Kindles are out, iPads are in, red is the new black, and Lionel is the new Derbyshire? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Congrats to the FSLAP
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 01:13:30 -0400, Rasta Khan wrote:
On 8/17/2012 1:04 AM, Rasta Khan wrote: On 8/17/2012 12:58 AM, kensi wrote: On 17/08/2012 12:25 AM, Rasta Khan wrote: On 8/16/2012 10:26 PM, [Tor] Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Three} wrote: sniggle Sour grapes, hah Lionel? Who is "Lionel", Khan? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. Typical Lionel response. You give more away with each post. Nice try. This is the first time you didn't sneck the photo groups. Until now you snecked them with every response. Only Lionel has ever done that to me on Usenet. Couple that with the sig, Lionel's taste short but bold. Even though your trolling ability is sophomoric at best, your flaming ability, OTOH, is top notch. That's Lionel in a nutshell. ( NOTE: no response from Lionel Nine minutes is hardly enough time when lots of people only log in and "do news" once or twice a day, twit. Try 24 hours. 48 to be sure. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Congrats to the FSLAP
On 17/08/2012 1:04 AM, Rasta Khan wrote:
On 8/17/2012 12:58 AM, kensi wrote: On 17/08/2012 12:25 AM, Rasta Khan wrote: On 8/16/2012 10:26 PM, [Tor] Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Three} wrote: sniggle Sour grapes, hah Lionel? Who is "Lionel", Khan? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. Typical Lionel response. Actually, it was copied off tholen. Now, I'll ask again: Who the hell is Lionel? You give more away with each post. Nice try. Care to tell us what I'm purportedly "giving away", ko0ky? This is the first time you didn't sneck the photo groups. Actually, I never snecked the photo groups. You can Google it if you don't believe me. Until now you snecked them with every response. A lie that can easily be disproved using google to find "Rasta Khan wrote" author:kensi and then examining the newsgroups lists in the results and their parent articles. Only Lionel has ever done that to me on Usenet. Ah, so everyone who snecks groups on Usenet is one person? Wow, it must be some form of standard ko0ky paranoia to believe that everyone who insert some criterion X that will match a large population, at least thousands if not millions of people, here is the same person. Couple that with the sig, Lionel's taste short but bold. *Most* people that have sigs have them "short, but bold", ko0ky. Long sigs are bad netiquette and if you have a sig at all it's generally supposed to make a statement. So now we have another criterion Y that will match a large population and you think they're all the same person, in addition to the criterion X from above. It's a ko0ky twofer deal! Even though your trolling ability is sophomoric at best, It's unpracticed for lack of my trolling very much. I prefer reasoned discourse to trolling. your flaming ability, OTOH, is top notch. Why, thank you. Flattery will get you nowhere, however. That's Lionel in a nutshell. And probably about 200 other usenetters. ( Aww, did the mean kensi make poor wittle rasta khan sad? Here, let me wipe away your tears ... with a swing for the fences with my kl00bat! -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Congrats to the FSLAP
On 17/08/2012 1:41 AM, Nadegda wrote:
PING: Co-FNVWs. Opinions, please, on the truth or falsity of this: Kindles are out, iPads are in, red is the new black, and Lionel is the new D3rbyshire? It's starting to look that way. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Congrats to the FSLAP
"China Blue [Tor], Meersburg" wrote in message
... In article , "Sweetness" wrote: He juss likes to threaten people that he barely knows. Kinda like Emmett. I like to threaten people I never meet. It's safer. By the way, I know what you did last summer. Was only one lil' pottery class... no harm done ! -- May the sun always shine warmly on Fluffy and our beloved FRiEnDly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler ! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Congrats to the FSLAP
Sweetness wrote:
"China Blue [Tor], Meersburg" wrote in message ... In article , "Sweetness" wrote: He juss likes to threaten people that he barely knows. Kinda like Emmett. I like to threaten people I never meet. It's safer. By the way, I know what you did last summer. Was only one lil' pottery class... no harm done ! If ever I were to Capture the Sweetness of the moment Exploitation of the process Would assuredly grant me Atonement In the eyes of the world I'd be exultant, an welcome production Only just before being forgotten |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Congrats to the FNVW *FRED* *HALL*! | Checkmate | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | August 16th 12 05:52 PM |
Congrats to William Graham! | Annika1980 | 35mm Photo Equipment | 19 | August 14th 07 03:32 AM |
Mirror slap? | William4 | Digital Photography | 27 | April 7th 07 02:12 AM |
Happy Slap Videos | Gamer | Digital Photography | 0 | January 22nd 05 03:00 AM |
Mirror Slap, A Good Point | Ted Azito | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | June 15th 04 12:50 AM |