If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Punography comments from Calvin Sambrook
Well it looks like almost everyone struggled as much as I did with this
month's mandate! PUN-Savageduck_old.jpg: What a fantastic photo. I particularly like the reflections off the "water" and the inclusion of the lumps of ice in the background which seems to me to give an impression of vast space. So much of this photo works well: the shadows, the composition, the colours. Fantastic. Pun_Michael Wyllie.jpg: As a photo this is just too visually confusing to work well for me. The mottled background having the same colours as the dragon and the camera position leaving the head in front of the body like that makes my attention jump all over the image without really seeing anything much. Sorry. I can't think what the pun is either - although that says more about me than the photo! Sorry again! Pun_Mike_Benveniste.jpg: I quite like this shot as a piece of art in itself. The nice crisp subject and the use of two very plain backgrounds works. I cant imagine what the pun is though. Punography Calvin Sambrook.jpg: Mine of course and I'm not at all happy. The basic concept has sort of worked but I wanted to produce something with strong lines down though the legs, arms and rope. Failed. I would have liked a more obvious look to the model's clothing. Without giving the pun away that is supposed to be a pirate's outfit but I don't think it's worked, I think we should have gone for a stereotyped "pirate costume". I'm also still not sure about my choice of background. I used this because it was sort of neutral while still looking like a street but now I look again it's simply too cluttered with tiny detail, I think I'd of been better off with someone's fence or something. On the good side I did at least manage to get the important bits on thirds which has helped a bit and Anna, my model, has sort of managed to look like she's pulling pack against being dragged along. Puns-Dont Be A Horses Ass-Cooper.jpg: I think this is probably a good photo in its own right but is spoiled by the mandate if you see what I mean. Without the symbol it's got nice composition and the shooting angle certainly grabs the attention! Puns-Horse Of A Different Color-Cooper.jpg: Wonderful. I love this shot. The choice of recolour, having the head on the major third and the offset framing within the frame all work to draw my eye in and grab my attention. Well done. Puns-Straight From The Horses Mouth-Cooper.jpg: This did nothing for me I'm afraid. The bridle in the top left is distracting as is the diagonal crop (what's going on there?). There's just not any visual interest, nothing to pull me in. pun-Paul-Furman-2008-edgehill.net.jpg: Wow. This would probably of been a nothingy, boring snap but the added blur works to really give it punch. I like the composition and the sharpness and texture in the bricks (look at the original size). Must admit though - I can't look at it for too long as it makes me feel ill ! "Blurring the boundaries" by any chance? pun_bowser1.jpg: This is funny on so many levels it's embarrassing! It's certainly not a great photo but within the context of this mandate I love it. pun_bowser2.jpg: Doesn't do it for me I'm afraid. Clearly it was tough to come up with photographically accomplished shots within this mandate, I know I failed. If I've just been nasty about your photo I apologise but take a look at mine, it's no better! -- Calvin |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Punography comments from Calvin Sambrook
"Calvin Sambrook" wrote in message ... Well it looks like almost everyone struggled as much as I did with this month's mandate! pun_bowser1.jpg: This is funny on so many levels it's embarrassing! It's certainly not a great photo but within the context of this mandate I love it. pun_bowser2.jpg: Doesn't do it for me I'm afraid. Yeah, and it's out of focus, too. Good news is that Buster got the cheese. He likes cheese. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Punography comments from Calvin Sambrook
On Mon, 11 May 2009 12:32:13 +0100, "Calvin Sambrook"
wrote: Puns-Dont Be A Horses Ass-Cooper.jpg: I think this is probably a good photo in its own right but is spoiled by the mandate if you see what I mean. Without the symbol it's got nice composition and the shooting angle certainly grabs the attention! Puns-Horse Of A Different Color-Cooper.jpg: Wonderful. I love this shot. The choice of recolour, having the head on the major third and the offset framing within the frame all work to draw my eye in and grab my attention. Well done. I like this photo http://tonycooper.smugmug.com/photos...26_VCfu3-L.jpg , taken at the same stable, better. This horse was not as easy to color, though, so I whipped one off of the white one. (Not the same white horse as the one in the field) Puns-Straight From The Horses Mouth-Cooper.jpg: This did nothing for me I'm afraid. The bridle in the top left is distracting as is the diagonal crop (what's going on there?). There's just not any visual interest, nothing to pull me in. It's not really a diagonal crop. When I was shooting the white horse in the field, another horse had his muzzle under the lowest fence bar and was munching grass from the other side. He had his head twisted to do so. I couldn't think of a way, pictorially, to convey "the grass is greener on the other side", so I noticed the one blade sticking almost straight up. I did line it up a little in post. The halter, not the bridle, was included to make it clear it was a horse. With tighter cropping, I wasn't sure it would be recognizable. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Punography comments from Calvin Sambrook
Calvin Sambrook wrote:
Well it looks like almost everyone struggled as much as I did with this month's mandate! PUN-Savageduck_old.jpg: What a fantastic photo. I particularly like the reflections off the "water" and the inclusion of the lumps of ice in the background which seems to me to give an impression of vast space. So much of this photo works well: the shadows, the composition, the colours. Fantastic. Pun_Michael Wyllie.jpg: As a photo this is just too visually confusing to work well for me. The mottled background having the same colours as the dragon and the camera position leaving the head in front of the body like that makes my attention jump all over the image without really seeing anything much. Sorry. I can't think what the pun is either - although that says more about me than the photo! Sorry again! Hi Calvin. I had 2 choices of background, the brown or some blue. I thought the brown suited the dragon better. Also head-on was the only way to capture all of the dragon, maybe I should've used a different model.... Anyway, try "Dragging the chain". Pun_Mike_Benveniste.jpg: I quite like this shot as a piece of art in itself. The nice crisp subject and the use of two very plain backgrounds works. I cant imagine what the pun is though. Punography Calvin Sambrook.jpg: Mine of course and I'm not at all happy. The basic concept has sort of worked but I wanted to produce something with strong lines down though the legs, arms and rope. Failed. I would have liked a more obvious look to the model's clothing. Without giving the pun away that is supposed to be a pirate's outfit but I don't think it's worked, I think we should have gone for a stereotyped "pirate costume". I'm also still not sure about my choice of background. I used this because it was sort of neutral while still looking like a street but now I look again it's simply too cluttered with tiny detail, I think I'd of been better off with someone's fence or something. On the good side I did at least manage to get the important bits on thirds which has helped a bit and Anna, my model, has sort of managed to look like she's pulling pack against being dragged along. Ok, as soon as you mentioned pirates clothing, I got it! :-) Puns-Dont Be A Horses Ass-Cooper.jpg: I think this is probably a good photo in its own right but is spoiled by the mandate if you see what I mean. Without the symbol it's got nice composition and the shooting angle certainly grabs the attention! Puns-Horse Of A Different Color-Cooper.jpg: Wonderful. I love this shot. The choice of recolour, having the head on the major third and the offset framing within the frame all work to draw my eye in and grab my attention. Well done. Puns-Straight From The Horses Mouth-Cooper.jpg: This did nothing for me I'm afraid. The bridle in the top left is distracting as is the diagonal crop (what's going on there?). There's just not any visual interest, nothing to pull me in. pun-Paul-Furman-2008-edgehill.net.jpg: Wow. This would probably of been a nothingy, boring snap but the added blur works to really give it punch. I like the composition and the sharpness and texture in the bricks (look at the original size). Must admit though - I can't look at it for too long as it makes me feel ill ! "Blurring the boundaries" by any chance? pun_bowser1.jpg: This is funny on so many levels it's embarrassing! It's certainly not a great photo but within the context of this mandate I love it. pun_bowser2.jpg: Doesn't do it for me I'm afraid. Clearly it was tough to come up with photographically accomplished shots within this mandate, I know I failed. If I've just been nasty about your photo I apologise but take a look at mine, it's no better! -- Calvin -- M.J.Wyllie. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Punography comments from Calvin Sambrook
On Mon, 11 May 2009 12:32:13 +0100, Calvin Sambrook wrote:
Pun_Mike_Benveniste.jpg: I quite like this shot as a piece of art in itself. The nice crisp subject and the use of two very plain backgrounds works. Thanks for the kind words. Looking at it again, I got lazy on the shadows on the easel. I cant imagine what the pun is though. Does it help to know that the spiky thing is an oriental fruit called a Durian? I guess I just took a walk on the Wilde side. -- Michael Benveniste -- (Clarification required) Legalize Updoc. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Punography comments from Calvin Sambrook
On 11 May 2009 23:50:03 GMT, Mike Benveniste
wrote: On Mon, 11 May 2009 12:32:13 +0100, Calvin Sambrook wrote: Pun_Mike_Benveniste.jpg: I quite like this shot as a piece of art in itself. The nice crisp subject and the use of two very plain backgrounds works. Thanks for the kind words. Looking at it again, I got lazy on the shadows on the easel. I cant imagine what the pun is though. Does it help to know that the spiky thing is an oriental fruit called a Durian? I guess I just took a walk on the Wilde side. It's a strange shot. Every time I look at it the thing in the middle looks older. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Punography comments from Calvin Sambrook
Calvin Sambrook wrote:
Well it looks like almost everyone struggled as much as I did with this month's mandate! PUN-Savageduck_old.jpg: What a fantastic photo. I particularly like the reflections off the "water" and the inclusion of the lumps of ice in the background which seems to me to give an impression of vast space. So much of this photo works well: the shadows, the composition, the colours. Fantastic. Pun_Michael Wyllie.jpg: As a photo this is just too visually confusing to work well for me. The mottled background having the same colours as the dragon and the camera position leaving the head in front of the body like that makes my attention jump all over the image without really seeing anything much. Sorry. I can't think what the pun is either - although that says more about me than the photo! Sorry again! Chain smoker? Pun_Mike_Benveniste.jpg: I quite like this shot as a piece of art in itself. The nice crisp subject and the use of two very plain backgrounds works. I cant imagine what the pun is though. Ugh, it's a leechee (sp?) I believe... a tropical fruit... I'm worse at deciphering visual puns than making them though g. Punography Calvin Sambrook.jpg: Mine of course and I'm not at all happy. The basic concept has sort of worked but I wanted to produce something with strong lines down though the legs, arms and rope. Failed. I would have liked a more obvious look to the model's clothing. Without giving the pun away that is supposed to be a pirate's outfit but I don't think it's worked, I think we should have gone for a stereotyped "pirate costume". I'm also still not sure about my choice of background. I used this because it was sort of neutral while still looking like a street but now I look again it's simply too cluttered with tiny detail, I think I'd of been better off with someone's fence or something. On the good side I did at least manage to get the important bits on thirds which has helped a bit and Anna, my model, has sort of managed to look like she's pulling pack against being dragged along. It's a charming photo, I still don't get it though... You must be in the UK, judging from the garden g. Puns-Dont Be A Horses Ass-Cooper.jpg: I think this is probably a good photo in its own right but is spoiled by the mandate if you see what I mean. Without the symbol it's got nice composition and the shooting angle certainly grabs the attention! Puns-Horse Of A Different Color-Cooper.jpg: Wonderful. I love this shot. The choice of recolour, having the head on the major third and the offset framing within the frame all work to draw my eye in and grab my attention. Well done. I couldn't help but think pink elephant :-| Puns-Straight From The Horses Mouth-Cooper.jpg: This did nothing for me I'm afraid. The bridle in the top left is distracting as is the diagonal crop (what's going on there?). There's just not any visual interest, nothing to pull me in. pun-Paul-Furman-2008-edgehill.net.jpg: Wow. This would probably of been a nothingy, boring snap but the added blur works to really give it punch. I like the composition and the sharpness and texture in the bricks (look at the original size). Must admit though - I can't look at it for too long as it makes me feel ill ! "Blurring the boundaries" by any chance? I'll confess now that it's an archive from this past autumn. 'Tilt/Shift' The ancient native American stone walls and geology have tilted & shifted over the centuries, the focal plane is tilted with a T/S lens, 85/2.8 Nikkor, Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. I seldom do this extreme of a tilt but the scene justifies it and I kind of like the dreamy shaman look. The right edge should be cropped out though, the colors turn all dark brown & mushy. pun_bowser1.jpg: This is funny on so many levels it's embarrassing! It's certainly not a great photo but within the context of this mandate I love it. pun_bowser2.jpg: Doesn't do it for me I'm afraid. Clearly it was tough to come up with photographically accomplished shots within this mandate, I know I failed. If I've just been nasty about your photo I apologise but take a look at mine, it's no better! -- Calvin -- Paul Furman www.edgehill.net www.baynatives.com all google groups messages filtered due to spam |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Punography comments from Calvin Sambrook
* Paul Furman wrote :
Calvin Sambrook wrote: [---=| Quote block shrinked by t-prot: 11 lines snipped |=---] the dragon and the camera position leaving the head in front of the body like that makes my attention jump all over the image without really seeing anything much. Sorry. I can't think what the pun is either - although that says more about me than the photo! Sorry again! Chain smoker? "Draggin' the chain" was what I took it as. I thought this was one of the more clever ones. "Chain smoker" works for me also, but that one hadn't occurred to me until you mentioned it. Good one. -- Troy Piggins |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Punography comments from Calvin Sambrook
"Mike Benveniste" wrote in message ... On Mon, 11 May 2009 12:32:13 +0100, Calvin Sambrook wrote: Pun_Mike_Benveniste.jpg: I quite like this shot as a piece of art in itself. The nice crisp subject and the use of two very plain backgrounds works. Thanks for the kind words. Looking at it again, I got lazy on the shadows on the easel. I cant imagine what the pun is though. Does it help to know that the spiky thing is an oriental fruit called a Durian? I guess I just took a walk on the Wilde side. A portrait of Durian Gray? -- Michael Benveniste -- (Clarification required) Legalize Updoc. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Punography comments from Calvin Sambrook
On Tue, 12 May 2009 07:46:34 -0400, Bowser wrote:
A portrait of Durian Gray? Close enough. Even though the Durian has been called the King of Fruits, the shot is not a portrait. The original work, of course, was "The Picture of Dorian Gray." -- Michael Benveniste -- (Clarification required) Legalize Updoc. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[SI] CloseUp comments from Calvin Sambrook | Calvin Sambrook | 35mm Photo Equipment | 6 | April 15th 09 02:43 AM |
Calvin Klein Underwear | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | January 23rd 08 12:19 PM |
Calvin Klein Underwear | [email protected] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | January 23rd 08 12:19 PM |