If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I knew it, I KNEW IT! New D7100 24mp NO AA filter!!!
On 21/02/2013 05:31, RichA wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2013/02...ow-pass-filter As has been discussed many times already here, once the sensor resolution exceeds that of the lens (in broad terms), there is less need for a strong anti-alias filter. -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I knew it, I KNEW IT! New D7100 24mp NO AA filter!!!
On 21/02/2013 7:54 p.m., David Taylor wrote:
On 21/02/2013 05:31, RichA wrote: http://www.dpreview.com/news/2013/02...ow-pass-filter As has been discussed many times already here, once the sensor resolution exceeds that of the lens (in broad terms), there is less need for a strong anti-alias filter. I wonder whether this D7100 has the same system as the D800E, retaining a two layer low-pass filter, one layer "cancelling-out" the effect of the other (sorry for weird explanation, but IIRC that's more-or-less how Nikon described it), or if it's got none at all? As described by Nikon, the D800E apparently needed that system to maintain the same optical path as the D800. There's no "ordinary" D7100 with AA filter. Some discussion and argument in the DPReview forums as to whether the D7100 means there will be no "D400". A couple of things suggest that there is room for a D400 - the D7100 frame rate is not faster than the 6YO D300, the buffer is smaller (only 6 raw frames), and the "kit" includes the relatively low-end 18-105 zoom. OTOH, Nikon's usual trick was to release the expensive model first, then release a version with a few features removed and a lower price six months down the track. (ie D200 then D80, D300 then D90). Anyway, the D7100 looks very interesting. The 51 point AF system on DX as per the D300 gives excellent frame-coverage - not all bunched-up like on FX models. The price is good IMO ($1200 for body). 24mp on Dx seems like a lot - it will be interesting to see samples. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I knew it, I KNEW IT! New D7100 24mp NO AA filter!!!
In article , Me
wrote: I wonder whether this D7100 has the same system as the D800E, retaining a two layer low-pass filter, one layer "cancelling-out" the effect of the other (sorry for weird explanation, but IIRC that's more-or-less how Nikon described it), or if it's got none at all? None at all, apparently. Nikon's excuse for using the pass filter on the D800E was to preserve the focal distance so they wouldn't have to move the sensor. I wonder how they dealt with it this time? Yeah - I read that reason given by Nikon, which doesn't make sense to me as the sensor plane itself should be the same. there are two antialias filters, one for each linear dimension. nikon removed the second one and replaced it with something to counteract the first one. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I knew it, I KNEW IT! New D7100 24mp NO AA filter!!!
"Me" wrote in message ... On 24/02/2013 12:04 p.m., RichA wrote: I honestly don't think Nikon can afford a real camera recall so they offer partial fixes. I disagree, with operating income $500 million, recalling and fixing (properly) a few tens of thousands of cameras might mean swallowing a dead rat, but it won't kill them. Losing their reputation as a supplier of premium quality products (including the customer support which should go along with that) eventually could. And yet doesn't seem to have had much affect. It's like Politicians and Banks, as long as your competitors are not much better, you can get away with anything. :-( Trevor. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I knew it, I KNEW IT! New D7100 24mp NO AA filter!!!
On 25/02/2013 4:06 p.m., Trevor wrote:
"Me" wrote in message ... On 24/02/2013 12:04 p.m., RichA wrote: I honestly don't think Nikon can afford a real camera recall so they offer partial fixes. I disagree, with operating income $500 million, recalling and fixing (properly) a few tens of thousands of cameras might mean swallowing a dead rat, but it won't kill them. Losing their reputation as a supplier of premium quality products (including the customer support which should go along with that) eventually could. And yet doesn't seem to have had much affect. It's like Politicians and Banks, as long as your competitors are not much better, you can get away with anything. :-( Hopefully not "corporate culture": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubi...efect_cover-up IIRC middle managers systematically filed complaints in bin 13. They used to run ads here - "don't you wish /you/ owned a Mitsubishi". Ummm - no thank you very much - and I never will. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sony's design for the 24mp APS | Rich[_6_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 32 | December 26th 11 05:53 PM |
Sony's design for the 24mp APS | Rich[_6_] | Digital Photography | 1 | December 14th 11 06:27 AM |
12mp vs 24mp - so what? | missfocus | Digital Photography | 80 | September 21st 08 07:49 PM |
12mp vs 24mp - so what? | missfocus | Digital SLR Cameras | 52 | September 15th 08 07:35 PM |
Which are the good cameras? Ed Romney knew! | Bret Ludwig | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | April 19th 06 01:52 AM |