If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon new release D7100
Speaking of the Nikon D7000 it looks like a replacement D7100
The new Nikon D7100 DSLR features a 24.1MP DX-format CMOS sensor and an EXPEED 3 image processor, which work together to produce high resolution still imagery and full HD 1080i/p video in multiple frame rates. Movie recording is also benefitted through the inclusion of both external microphone and headphone jacks as well as the ability to manual adjust exposure settings during recording. A notable improvement in image sharpness and resolution is afforded through the removal of the optical low-pass filter, and a 51-point autofocus system with 15 cross-type sensors ensures quick and precise focusing. The large 3.2" 1,229k-dot LCD monitor allows live view monitoring and image review and the optical pentaprism viewfinder incorporates an OLED information display and provides 100% field coverage. The EXPEED 3 image processor also provides a wealth of speed throughout the camera system and enables a full-resolution continuous shooting rate of 6fps, a 1.3x DX crop continuous shooting rate of 7fps and an expandable maximum sensitivity to ISO 25600. The new Spot White Balance features permits selective control over custom white balance settings and built-in HDR automatically composites bracketed frames to produce a single image with an extended dynamic range. The D7100 is compatible with the WU-1a Wireless Mobile Adapter to enable wireless connectivity and the ability to instantly transfer imagery to iOS and Android mobile devices. Housing all of the imaging technology is a redesigned body that features magnesium alloy top and rear covers for increased durability and moisture- and weather-resistance. The D7100 is available as a body only or in a kit with the AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f/3.5-5l.6G ED VR lens. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon new release D7100
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:02:27 +1100, Rob wrote:
: Speaking of the Nikon D7000 it looks like a replacement D7100 : : : The new Nikon D7100 DSLR features a 24.1MP DX-format CMOS sensor and an : EXPEED 3 image processor, which work together to produce high resolution : still imagery and full HD 1080i/p video in multiple frame rates. Movie : recording is also benefitted through the inclusion of both external : microphone and headphone jacks as well as the ability to manual adjust : exposure settings during recording. A notable improvement in image : sharpness and resolution is afforded through the removal of the optical : low-pass filter, and a 51-point autofocus system with 15 cross-type : sensors ensures quick and precise focusing. The large 3.2" 1,229k-dot : LCD monitor allows live view monitoring and image review and the optical : pentaprism viewfinder incorporates an OLED information display and : provides 100% field coverage. The EXPEED 3 image processor also provides : a wealth of speed throughout the camera system and enables a : full-resolution continuous shooting rate of 6fps, a 1.3x DX crop : continuous shooting rate of 7fps and an expandable maximum sensitivity : to ISO 25600. The new Spot White Balance features permits selective : control over custom white balance settings and built-in HDR : automatically composites bracketed frames to produce a single image with : an extended dynamic range. The D7100 is compatible with the WU-1a : Wireless Mobile Adapter to enable wireless connectivity and the ability : to instantly transfer imagery to iOS and Android mobile devices. Housing : all of the imaging technology is a redesigned body that features : magnesium alloy top and rear covers for increased durability and : moisture- and weather-resistance. The D7100 is available as a body only : or in a kit with the AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f/3.5-5l.6G ED VR lens. So.... Is THIS the long-awaited "D300 Replacement"? Or just one more shred of evidence that Nikon now equates serious photography with full-frame and that a true D300 replacement is a pipe dream? (As a Canonian, I of course ask this question only to stir the pot and keep it boiling evenly.) ;^) BTW, I don't think I'd be happy with the kit lens, if the best it can do at 105mm is f/51.6. Bob |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon new release D7100
Robert Coe wrote:
So.... Is THIS the long-awaited "D300 Replacement"? No. "I can assure you that the D7100 is not positioned to replace the D300s as Nikon's flagship DX-format camera - such is the information received from Nikon Japan on the matter." // Nikon Europe Support http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/th...-post-50901841 http://nikonrumors.com/2013/02/24/ni...lace-the-d300s -- Fredrik Jonson |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon new release D7100
On 1/03/2013 6:52 AM, Fredrik Jonson wrote:
Robert Coe wrote: So.... Is THIS the long-awaited "D300 Replacement"? No. "I can assure you that the D7100 is not positioned to replace the D300s as Nikon's flagship DX-format camera - such is the information received from Nikon Japan on the matter." // Nikon Europe Support http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/th...-post-50901841 http://nikonrumors.com/2013/02/24/ni...lace-the-d300s I don't think it ever was a d300 replacement, my understanding, at the time, the D7000 was a D90 replacement and fits that category. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon new release D7100
No AA filter = lots of sampling errors, some visible, some less.
-- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon new release D7100
In article , Alfred
Molon wrote: No AA filter = lots of sampling errors, some visible, some less. it depends on the subject. take a photo where there's very little detail, such as a solid colour wall, and there won't be any aliasing. take a photo of something with a lot of detail and there will be. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon new release D7100
On 2/23/2013 5:08 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , Alfred Molon wrote: No AA filter = lots of sampling errors, some visible, some less. it depends on the subject. take a photo where there's very little detail, such as a solid colour wall, and there won't be any aliasing. take a photo of something with a lot of detail and there will be. And your experience using one is? Or is your comment made based on a survey. One of my friends, a fashion photographer, uses his D800E. His results are fantastic. A well respected fine art photographer also uses one, and she is quite happy with the results. The main reason I did not get one, is that I didn't nbeed that feature for the type of shooting I do. -- PeterN |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon new release D7100
In article , PeterN
wrote: No AA filter = lots of sampling errors, some visible, some less. it depends on the subject. take a photo where there's very little detail, such as a solid colour wall, and there won't be any aliasing. take a photo of something with a lot of detail and there will be. And your experience using one is? Or is your comment made based on a survey. displaying your ignorance again, i see. it's based on a solid understanding of signal theory and aliasing, something you apparently lack and something that affects *all* digital cameras. if there's detail beyond nyquist and no antialias filter to bandlimit it, there *will* be aliasing, guaranteed. One of my friends, a fashion photographer, uses his D800E. His results are fantastic. A well respected fine art photographer also uses one, and she is quite happy with the results. The main reason I did not get one, is that I didn't nbeed that feature for the type of shooting I do. that's nice. being happy with the results has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not there is aliasing. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon new release D7100
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 21:35:26 -0500, nospam
wrote: In article , PeterN wrote: No AA filter = lots of sampling errors, some visible, some less. it depends on the subject. take a photo where there's very little detail, such as a solid colour wall, and there won't be any aliasing. take a photo of something with a lot of detail and there will be. And your experience using one is? Or is your comment made based on a survey. displaying your ignorance again, i see. it's based on a solid understanding of signal theory and aliasing, something you apparently lack and something that affects *all* digital cameras. if there's detail beyond nyquist and no antialias filter to bandlimit it, there *will* be aliasing, guaranteed. It's not quite that simple. If you wade through all of http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tu...solution.shtml you will eventually reach the conclusion: "Conclusions So, do sensors outresolve lenses? It depends on the lens you use, the properties of the light, the aperture and the format. Small format sensors may have surpassed the limit, this is, in most cases they are lens-limited in terms of resolution. It is easier to correct aberrations for a smaller light circle though, so you can approach diffraction-limited resolutions for lower f-numbers. The signal-to-noise ratio, however, imposes an inflexible limit to the effective resolution of the whole system, mostly due to photon shot noise. Sensors for larger formats are approaching the diffraction limit of real lenses, and it is more difficult to get high levels of aberration suppression for them. The point is that you cannot fully exploit the resolution potential of high-resolution sensors with regular mass-produced lenses, particularly for larger formats. You cannot compare the limits of two different photographic systems looking at a print because the variables that determine the subjective perception come into play. Different systems can provide comparable results on paper under certain conditions (the circle of confusion reasoning explains how that is possible), but the limit of a system must be evaluated considering the pixel as the minimum circle of confusion.." One of my friends, a fashion photographer, uses his D800E. His results are fantastic. A well respected fine art photographer also uses one, and she is quite happy with the results. The main reason I did not get one, is that I didn't nbeed that feature for the type of shooting I do. that's nice. being happy with the results has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not there is aliasing. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon new release D7100
On 3/1/2013 9:35 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: No AA filter = lots of sampling errors, some visible, some less. it depends on the subject. take a photo where there's very little detail, such as a solid colour wall, and there won't be any aliasing. take a photo of something with a lot of detail and there will be. And your experience using one is? Or is your comment made based on a survey. displaying your ignorance again, i see. Yes I am totally ignorant of the factual basis for your statement. All I know is what works and what doesn't. Your past history gives us little reason to accept your conclusion, without proof. This is especially true since you appear never to have used the cameras under discussion. it's based on a solid understanding of signal theory and aliasing, something you apparently lack and something that affects *all* digital cameras. if there's detail beyond nyquist and no antialias filter to bandlimit it, there *will* be aliasing, guaranteed. One of my friends, a fashion photographer, uses his D800E. His results are fantastic. A well respected fine art photographer also uses one, and she is quite happy with the results. The main reason I did not get one, is that I didn't nbeed that feature for the type of shooting I do. that's nice. being happy with the results has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not there is aliasing. For the individuals I mentioned being happy means they are well paid. Any any faults you claim to exist are well within the bounds of high standard commercial acceptability. Just as circles of confusion can be commercially acceptable. BTW I suspect that you are not aware that for high fashion the results from Apple monitors and unacceptable, because they do not accurately produce the necessary gradations in the shadows. For that work people use other monitors such as high end NEC, LaCie, at the lower end and Eizo, at the upper end. -- PeterN |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I knew it, I KNEW IT! New D7100 24mp NO AA filter!!! | David Taylor | Digital SLR Cameras | 4 | February 25th 13 03:52 AM |
Would Nikon release new telescopes? | Paul Furman | Digital Photography | 7 | August 31st 10 04:16 AM |
Nikon Afficionado's New Release Due When?? | uw wayne | 35mm Photo Equipment | 37 | May 3rd 06 05:02 AM |
FA: Nikon N70 AF Black Body and Nikon Remote Shutter release | J N | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | September 24th 03 07:51 PM |
FA: Nikon N70 AF Black Body and Nikon Remote Shutter release | J N | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | September 24th 03 07:51 PM |