If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
'nospam'
"David B." "David
Sat, 09 Feb 2019 16:32:44 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 09/02/2019 16:26, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote: https://nofile.io/f/rJGCQ1mtUHv/Spit...Marcus+-+Oct+2 018.JPG My son took the photograph. 2210 will open the lock. It would have been better to have not posted a password-protected link in the first place. This kind of behaviour would reduce my level of respect for you if it were not already as low as possible. What do you think of the photograph? There are not many flying nowadays. And I quote: Your honesty can be determined by your actions, such as snipping the relevant section of my post. As it can easily be demonstrated that you are extremely dishonest, any statements you make about your sobriety are suspect. Without evidence I cannot take any statement you make as being truthful. I stand by my position that you are a drunkard. You completely ignore what the person writes and ask a question as if they wrote nothing. Rude, to say the least. -- Seen on the back of a loaded horse trailer: |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]'nospam'
John McWilliams
Sun, 10 Feb 2019 05:57:10 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 2/9/19 PDT 6:13 PM, Shadow wrote: On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 16:32:44 +0000, "David B." "David wrote: On 09/02/2019 16:26, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote: My son took the photograph. 2210 will open the lock. It would have been better to have not posted a password-protected link in the first place. This kind of behaviour would reduce my level of respect for you if it were not already as low as possible. What do you think of the photograph? Is it on topic ? If not, refrain from crossposting it to completely irrelevant groups. People might get the impression you are phishing for suckers. Folks replying can set followups to the correct group, if one. If just a flood or a troll, send it to one random group. Folk can also respond to your baited posts and correct what you intentionally broke. As I've done. -- I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
'nospam'
"David B." "David
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:01:51 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: I know exactly who and what YOU are, 'Diesel'. Based on the fact you failed to recruit me, I'd say it's a safe bet you do not. I reiterate, I've had not a drop of alcohol since 21st March 2018. I don't believe you. -- Conclusion: the place where you got tired of thinking. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Drive Behind Jonas-nospam Debates | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 2 | December 2nd 15 04:36 PM |
Just what nospam has been telling us: | Eric Stevens | Digital Photography | 1 | October 23rd 15 04:20 PM |
Nospam's Dead Body &c. | Davoud | Digital Photography | 76 | March 1st 15 04:01 PM |
Over nospam's dead body | Alan Browne | Digital Photography | 0 | February 26th 15 12:53 PM |
One for nospam | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 4 | August 15th 13 03:56 PM |