A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ilford put under administration, expected to be sold



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 24th 04, 03:49 AM
Michael Benveniste
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ilford put under administration, expected to be sold

The fate of Ilford film is unknown, but the outlook is bleak:

See:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFr...230067,00.html

--
Michael Benveniste --
Spam and UCE professionally evaluated for $419. Use this email
address only to submit mail for evaluation.

  #2  
Old August 24th 04, 10:03 AM
Malcolm Stewart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Michael Benveniste" wrote in message
...
The fate of Ilford film is unknown, but the outlook is bleak:

See:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFr...230067,00.html



A company which couldn't, or wouldn't, provide me with a product brochure
when I called personally at their Mobberley HQ & factory a few years ago,
doesn't deserve too much sympathy. Particularly when something like 95% of
my B&W work was shot on their film stock.
--
M Stewart
Milton Keynes, UK
http://www.megalith.freeserve.co.uk\oddimage.htm



  #3  
Old August 24th 04, 10:03 AM
Malcolm Stewart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Michael Benveniste" wrote in message
...
The fate of Ilford film is unknown, but the outlook is bleak:

See:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFr...230067,00.html



A company which couldn't, or wouldn't, provide me with a product brochure
when I called personally at their Mobberley HQ & factory a few years ago,
doesn't deserve too much sympathy. Particularly when something like 95% of
my B&W work was shot on their film stock.
--
M Stewart
Milton Keynes, UK
http://www.megalith.freeserve.co.uk\oddimage.htm



  #4  
Old August 24th 04, 01:20 PM
Mark Roberts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael Benveniste wrote:

See:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFr...230067,00.html


Also:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/m...de/3591360.stm
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/a2c9322c-f5...00e2511c8.html
http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/bu...closure. html


--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
  #5  
Old August 24th 04, 01:20 PM
Mark Roberts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael Benveniste wrote:

See:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFr...230067,00.html


Also:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/m...de/3591360.stm
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/a2c9322c-f5...00e2511c8.html
http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/bu...closure. html


--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
  #6  
Old August 24th 04, 03:14 PM
Justin F. Knotzke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

quote who= Malcolm Stewart /:

A company which couldn't, or wouldn't, provide me with a product brochure
when I called personally at their Mobberley HQ & factory a few years ago,
doesn't deserve too much sympathy. Particularly when something like 95% of
my B&W work was shot on their film stock.


Oh ya, I couldn't agree more. Hundreds of employees deserve to lose their
jobs because you couldn't bother to download the PDF online.

Oh the shame of it all.

J


--
Justin F. Knotzke

http://www.shampoo.ca
  #7  
Old August 24th 04, 03:14 PM
Justin F. Knotzke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

quote who= Malcolm Stewart /:

A company which couldn't, or wouldn't, provide me with a product brochure
when I called personally at their Mobberley HQ & factory a few years ago,
doesn't deserve too much sympathy. Particularly when something like 95% of
my B&W work was shot on their film stock.


Oh ya, I couldn't agree more. Hundreds of employees deserve to lose their
jobs because you couldn't bother to download the PDF online.

Oh the shame of it all.

J


--
Justin F. Knotzke

http://www.shampoo.ca
  #8  
Old August 24th 04, 03:14 PM
Justin F. Knotzke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

quote who= Malcolm Stewart /:

A company which couldn't, or wouldn't, provide me with a product brochure
when I called personally at their Mobberley HQ & factory a few years ago,
doesn't deserve too much sympathy. Particularly when something like 95% of
my B&W work was shot on their film stock.


Oh ya, I couldn't agree more. Hundreds of employees deserve to lose their
jobs because you couldn't bother to download the PDF online.

Oh the shame of it all.

J


--
Justin F. Knotzke

http://www.shampoo.ca
  #9  
Old August 24th 04, 04:07 PM
Philip Homburg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Justin F. Knotzke wrote:
quote who= Malcolm Stewart /:

A company which couldn't, or wouldn't, provide me with a product brochure
when I called personally at their Mobberley HQ & factory a few years ago,
doesn't deserve too much sympathy. Particularly when something like 95% of
my B&W work was shot on their film stock.


Oh ya, I couldn't agree more. Hundreds of employees deserve to lose their
jobs because you couldn't bother to download the PDF online.

Oh the shame of it all.


It does work that way. A discussion in rec.photo.film+labs about Kodak
reminded me that I can't remember an advertisement for film that really
made me go out and buy it.




--
The Electronic Monk was a labor-saving device, like a dishwasher or a video
recorder. [...] Video recorders watched tedious television for you, thus saving
you the bother of looking at it yourself; Electronic Monks believed things for
you, [...] -- Douglas Adams in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency
  #10  
Old August 24th 04, 04:07 PM
Philip Homburg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Justin F. Knotzke wrote:
quote who= Malcolm Stewart /:

A company which couldn't, or wouldn't, provide me with a product brochure
when I called personally at their Mobberley HQ & factory a few years ago,
doesn't deserve too much sympathy. Particularly when something like 95% of
my B&W work was shot on their film stock.


Oh ya, I couldn't agree more. Hundreds of employees deserve to lose their
jobs because you couldn't bother to download the PDF online.

Oh the shame of it all.


It does work that way. A discussion in rec.photo.film+labs about Kodak
reminded me that I can't remember an advertisement for film that really
made me go out and buy it.




--
The Electronic Monk was a labor-saving device, like a dishwasher or a video
recorder. [...] Video recorders watched tedious television for you, thus saving
you the bother of looking at it yourself; Electronic Monks believed things for
you, [...] -- Douglas Adams in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ilford - Bad News David Livingstone Medium Format Photography Equipment 22 September 9th 04 07:58 AM
ilford pan 100 = ilford HP5 plus? sreenath In The Darkroom 8 July 5th 04 11:15 AM
ilford rapid fixer Beppe Alborč In The Darkroom 25 June 24th 04 10:21 AM
Paper question-- FreeStyle Product-Is Arista VC RC same as Ilford MG RC? Jos. Burke In The Darkroom 5 June 15th 04 05:07 AM
Ilford 11x14 film specs CBlood59 In The Darkroom 4 March 3rd 04 06:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.