Canon 20D leaked offical photos!

"David Littlewood" wrote in message
...
In article , Annika1980
writes
From: David Littlewood

That means those of use with lots of EF lenses will be left frustrated,
and those who care about quality will be left with smaller noisier
sensors.

Smaller, yes.
Noiser, no.

Ain't technology wonderful?

By definition, other design aspects being equal, a smaller sensor must
be noisier than a larger one.
--
David Littlewood

The point here, I think, is that other design aspects are not equal. IF
Canon left the design alone, just added pixels, you'd be right.

--
Skip Middleton
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com

In article 0ukXc.105678$Lj.53181@fed1read03, Skip M
writes
"David Littlewood" wrote in message
.. .
In article , Annika1980
writes
From: David Littlewood

That means those of use with lots of EF lenses will be left frustrated,
and those who care about quality will be left with smaller noisier
sensors.

Smaller, yes.
Noiser, no.

Ain't technology wonderful?

By definition, other design aspects being equal, a smaller sensor must
be noisier than a larger one.
--
David Littlewood

The point here, I think, is that other design aspects are not equal. IF
Canon left the design alone, just added pixels, you'd be right.

But any improvement done to the one, could be done to the other. It is
just the same as for film; great fuss was made over the "improved"
emulsions introduced with APS, but the enhancements found their way into
35mm almost at once.

David
--
David Littlewood

In article 0ukXc.105678$Lj.53181@fed1read03, Skip M
writes
"David Littlewood" wrote in message
.. .
In article , Annika1980
writes
From: David Littlewood

That means those of use with lots of EF lenses will be left frustrated,
and those who care about quality will be left with smaller noisier
sensors.

Smaller, yes.
Noiser, no.

Ain't technology wonderful?

By definition, other design aspects being equal, a smaller sensor must
be noisier than a larger one.
--
David Littlewood

The point here, I think, is that other design aspects are not equal. IF
Canon left the design alone, just added pixels, you'd be right.

But any improvement done to the one, could be done to the other. It is
just the same as for film; great fuss was made over the "improved"
emulsions introduced with APS, but the enhancements found their way into
35mm almost at once.

David
--
David Littlewood

Kibo informs me that Jim Townsend stated that:

Yep.. It's costing a fortune to stay 'latest and greatest'. My 10D
serves me well.

I made a promise to myself that I'd wait until whatever replaced the 10D
was in turn replaced.. So I'm going to wait for the 30D

Having spent many years working with laptops, I also believe that
skipping every second upgrade model is the best policy, in terms of
value for money. Taking every upgrade is a huge waste of money.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------