If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
I thought I would pass on my experience so far scanning large format
images with my new Epson 4870 scanner. Later, I'll post some comparison images so you can see how good this scanner is. So far my experience is that it is close enough to drum scans I've had done that I will use it for almost all my work. It is not quite as sharp on Fujichrome Velvia as the drum scans I've done, but careful sharpening overcomes the limit for the most part. However, because it can do 16-bit compared to the drum scans, I believe it is better because I can recover more shadow and highlight details. The problem is that at 16 bits/channel, no scanner software I've used can scan the full width of a 4x5 transparency at anywhere near the rated ppi of the scanner. My requirements are 3200 ppi minimum (the scanner does 4800 ppi). In my testing, 3200 ppi gets information important to my images that 2400 ppi loses. I've tested Epson scan, Silverfast, and Vuescan, all the latest versions. The limit, as discussed in a recent rec.photo.large-format and comp.sys.scanners thread, is due to a firmware limitation in the scanner limiting total bytes per line, and that limit does not allow the full width of 4x5 to be scanned at 16 bit except at 2400 ppi. Vuescan, for example, reads 4800 ppi if you request 3200 then downsamples. Epson scan was the one I used. I can do 3200 ppi, 16-bits/channel and a 3.4-inch line width. With ICE turned on, such a scan takes about 1 hour. Then I move the box over the the other half of the image, with lots of overlap, and scan a second time, another hour. I make sure the settings are exactly the same for the two scans. The resulting images are about 14,820 x 11,740 pixels and 1 GByte. This joining procedure went well in photoshop CS on a 1.8 GHz win XP box with 2 GB ram and 600 GB disk. I combine the two halves in photoshop. The intensity levels match essentially perfectly: you can't see the join line at all. I have found that some, but not all scans mis-register by about a half pixel in blocks of a few hundred scan lines, meaning one block will be dead on, the next off slightly. I erase the edge of the overlap image to so it is not straight, add some feathering, and follow darker portions of the image if possible and the the images go together without a possibility of finding a join line. Then, to really push the limits, I mosaiced two such 4x5 images into a panorama. The result: 23,380 x 11,820 pixels. But here is where it really became difficult. The combined file size in photoshop, keeping them as layers was over 2 GBytes and photoshop would not save the file when I tried. Fortunately it did not crash either, so I had to feather the join line and merge the images before the file size dropped below 2 GBytes. I'm using NTFS (file system) so files can be larger than 2 GB, but photoshop would do it in standard photoshop format. If someone knows of a way for photoshop to save such a file (and read it in again later), please let me know. The final image is 1.62 GBytes. The problem with mosaicing images is the lens distortions. If someone knows of software that will do the mosaicing on such large images, please let me know. Anyway, Thanks for those in previous threads who helped me work out the details and limits of the scanner. I will just have to sigh, and scan in pieces! So here is the final image: http://www.clarkvision.com/galleries...a+b.c.791.html If people want more information on the procedure, I'll be happy to provide it. Roger Clark http://www.clarkvision.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
In article , "Roger N. Clark (change username
to rnclark)" wrote: [...] The combined file size in photoshop, keeping them as layers was over 2 GBytes and photoshop would not save the file when I tried. [...] Roger (and others with the same large-file problem), the new Photoshop (CS) will work with and save images larger than 2gb as an option. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
In article , "Roger N. Clark (change username
to rnclark)" wrote: [...] Roger - one more thing. Have you considered using the ZoomView feature of Photoshop (7 and up) to display your web image? That way you can put the whole image up and we can zoom into segments. One example: http://arts.winona.edu/i/drake/burwell001.html (probably expired) And I've one of Brian Caldwell's well known Flat Iron building. (ask for URL) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
"Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)" wrote in message ... I thought I would pass on my experience so far scanning large format images with my new Epson 4870 scanner. Later, I'll post some comparison images so you can see how good this scanner is. Thanks, looking forward to the examples. The resolution numbers you reported earlier, seem higher than some of the other users reported. Maybe your methods of determination are more accurate, and maybe you also got an above average sample from the inevitable quality spread. SNIP I combine the two halves in photoshop. The intensity levels match essentially perfectly: you can't see the join line at all. I have found that some, but not all scans mis-register by about a half pixel in blocks of a few hundred scan lines, meaning one block will be dead on, the next off slightly. That is actually pretty good for a flatbed scanner. The temperature rise when scanning (causing film expansion), play in the CCD/lens assembly, and lens distortion, can accumulate to several pixels on other scanners. I erase the edge of the overlap image to so it is not straight, add some feathering, and follow darker portions of the image if possible and the the images go together without a possibility of finding a join line. In Photoshop it might be done quicker by setting the layer blending mode to "difference" (meaning equal RGB values are black), but maybe that's what you already did. SNIP If someone knows of a way for photoshop to save such a file (and read it in again later), please let me know. The final image is 1.62 GBytes. Photoshop CS seems to be able to do that with the .psb "Large Document Format" (up to 300,000 pixels in any dimension, upto 56 channels per file, all PS features enabled), although the operating system seems to pose a process limit (not file limit as I presumed earlier) to 2GB, maybe Photoshop gets around that by dividing between processes. The problem with mosaicing images is the lens distortions. If someone knows of software that will do the mosaicing on such large images, please let me know. Haven't tried it on such big files, but I use the combination of Panorama Tools (http://www.tawbaware.com/maxlyons/pano12ml.htm) and the PTAssembler GUI frontend (http://www.tawbaware.com/ptasmblr.htm). It also allows the stitching of plan-parallel offset images and morphing the residual differences. The author, Max Lyons, did a recompile of Helmut Dersch's source code to include some additional functionality, so I'd assume he's capable of addressing particular issues you might run into. Anyway, Thanks for those in previous threads who helped me work out the details and limits of the scanner. I will just have to sigh, and scan in pieces! So here is the final image: http://www.clarkvision.com/galleries...a+b.c.791.html Lot's of dynamic range! It looks pretty good, thanks for sharing. Bart |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
jjs wrote:
In article , "Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)" wrote: [...] The combined file size in photoshop, keeping them as layers was over 2 GBytes and photoshop would not save the file when I tried. [...] Roger (and others with the same large-file problem), the new Photoshop (CS) will work with and save images larger than 2gb as an option. Yes, I did use CS. Thanks to you and Bart, I looked inder preference, file handling, and found the large format check box. I wish I knew about that earlier! Roger |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
Bart van der Wolf wrote:
"Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)" wrote in message ... I thought I would pass on my experience so far scanning large format images with my new Epson 4870 scanner. Later, I'll post some comparison images so you can see how good this scanner is. In Photoshop it might be done quicker by setting the layer blending mode to "difference" (meaning equal RGB values are black), but maybe that's what you already did. Yes. That is the most accurate way in my opinion. It works very well. Photoshop CS seems to be able to do that with the .psb "Large Document Format" (up to 300,000 pixels in any dimension, upto 56 channels per file, all PS features enabled), although the operating system seems to pose a process limit (not file limit as I presumed earlier) to 2GB, maybe Photoshop gets around that by dividing between processes. Thanks, I now have it enabled. I had assumed the existing psd format had been extended, bbut it is a whole new format. The problem with mosaicing images is the lens distortions. If someone knows of software that will do the mosaicing on such large images, please let me know. Haven't tried it on such big files, but I use the combination of Panorama Tools (http://www.tawbaware.com/maxlyons/pano12ml.htm) and the PTAssembler GUI frontend (http://www.tawbaware.com/ptasmblr.htm). It also allows the stitching of plan-parallel offset images and morphing the residual differences. The author, Max Lyons, did a recompile of Helmut Dersch's source code to include some additional functionality, so I'd assume he's capable of addressing particular issues you might run into. Thanks, I'll check them out. Roger |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
jjs wrote:
In article , "Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)" wrote: [...] Roger - one more thing. Have you considered using the ZoomView feature of Photoshop (7 and up) to display your web image? That way you can put the whole image up and we can zoom into segments. One example: http://arts.winona.edu/i/drake/burwell001.html (probably expired) And I've one of Brian Caldwell's well known Flat Iron building. (ask for URL) OK, I checked this out. Pretty cool program. The question I have about this, is how secure is it? It seems that if you know the structure of the program files, which is easily done with one test, then one can go to the image directory and simply download all the tiles and reassemble the complete image! It tried it and was able to access all of them easily. Roger |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
In article , "Roger N. Clark (change username
to rnclark)" wrote: jjs wrote: One example: http://arts.winona.edu/i/drake/burwell001.html (probably expired) And I've one of Brian Caldwell's well known Flat Iron building. (ask for URL) OK, I checked this out. Pretty cool program. It's built into Photoshop. The tiles are, as you probably found, JPEG images with a different file extension. The question I have about this, is how secure is it? It seems that if you know the structure of the program files, which is easily done with one test, then one can go to the image directory and simply download all the tiles and reassemble the complete image! It tried it and was able to access all of them easily. It isn't secure, of course. In fact, I can think of no way to assure security of http served images. If one can see an image, he can copy it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
I missed the beginning of this thread (I see it's heavily cross posted). Just wanted to add
something about large images: a while ago I developped an app that displays/manipulates large image files quickly. It's probably not what you are looking for but might give you an idea. I did it mainly to access scientific bitmaps. The freeware is online at http://www.gdargaud.net/Hack/LargeImage.html For instance I used it to create the images on http://www.gdargaud.net/Antarctica/RadarSat.html from a 2Gb image file. and there's even a cgi demo at http://gdargaud.dnsalias.com/RadarSat/LargeImageCgi.exe but it's an excrutiatingly slow ADSL line. -- Guillaume Dargaud http://www.gdargaud.net/ "Eat one live toad the first thing in the morning and nothing worse will happen to you the rest of the day." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
"Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)" wrote in message ... Bart van der Wolf wrote: Photoshop CS seems to be able to do that with the .psb "Large Document Format" (up to 300,000 pixels in any dimension, upto 56 channels per file, all PS features enabled), although the operating system seems to pose a process limit (not file limit as I presumed earlier) to 2GB, maybe Photoshop gets around that by dividing between processes. Thanks, I now have it enabled. I had assumed the existing psd format had been extended, bbut it is a whole new format. Is it possible in PS-CS to print files as large as the 300,000 pixel limit? I mean that if I have a file that is 12,000 x 72,000 pixels can I print that on my Epson 9600 as a 20 foot panoramic? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|