If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks.
Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line. You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies. http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm Ronald |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
You have some nice images in there. I might make them smaller, and easier to
see. I would also recommend putting a some sort of visible watermark on your images otherwise they might end up in someone elsešs portfolio. -- PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson) Over 1,000 Photographs Online at, http://PhotoStockFile.com On 10/19/03 11:41 PM, in article , "Shu" wrote: Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks. Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line. You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies. http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm Ronald |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
Shu wrote: Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks. Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line. You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies. http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm Ronald Congrats. Maybe name your "kayaking" shots to "canoe" shots... (97-07) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
Question - is there any "value" to reduced sized web photos? Certainly a
print couldn't be made of any commercial value, IMHO. Also, with respect, I find your (PWW) copyright across the heart of the picture very distracting. Cheers, rma "PWW" wrote in message ... You have some nice images in there. I might make them smaller, and easier to see. I would also recommend putting a some sort of visible watermark on your images otherwise they might end up in someone elsešs portfolio. -- PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson) Over 1,000 Photographs Online at, http://PhotoStockFile.com On 10/19/03 11:41 PM, in article , "Shu" wrote: Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks. Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line. You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies. http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm Ronald |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
Just wondering....I just added a photo section to my website. I put a
"no right click" javascript on all the photo pages with a friendly kind of message that says it you would like a copy to contact me Is that enough to stop people from stealing my photos? I know about Digimarc, but I'm not working at present, so $$ are rather tight. What does everyone else do to protect their work, but also get it out there for people to see? ralford wrote: Question - is there any "value" to reduced sized web photos? Certainly a print couldn't be made of any commercial value, IMHO. Also, with respect, I find your (PWW) copyright across the heart of the picture very distracting. Cheers, rma "PWW" wrote in message ... You have some nice images in there. I might make them smaller, and easier to see. I would also recommend putting a some sort of visible watermark on your images otherwise they might end up in someone elsešs portfolio. -- PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson) Over 1,000 Photographs Online at, http://PhotoStockFile.com On 10/19/03 11:41 PM, in article , "Shu" wrote: Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks. Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line. You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies. http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm Ronald |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
All those special ways to stop copying just doesn't work very well. It seems
that there are ways around all of them. That is why I recommend putting a visible watermark on each and every image I put on the web. And use a lower resolution image of not to big of size. I just figure that I have to get my images out in front of clients and and accept a few thefts from my lower rez, smaller watermarked images might make them think twice about taking my images without my permission. I will still go after every single copyright infringement that I can. -- PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson) Over 1,000 Photographs Online at, http://PhotoStockFile.com On 10/20/03 2:51 PM, in article , "Carole" wrote: Just wondering....I just added a photo section to my website. I put a "no right click" javascript on all the photo pages with a friendly kind of message that says it you would like a copy to contact me Is that enough to stop people from stealing my photos? I know about Digimarc, but I'm not working at present, so $$ are rather tight. What does everyone else do to protect their work, but also get it out there for people to see? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
"PWW" wrote: snip That is why I recommend putting a visible watermark on each and every image I put on the web. And use a lower snip I think you have a very nice site, and if someone wants to buy the image, the watermark is not that distracting. Have fun, Dave |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
Did you look at his web-site? He had huge files on his site. I do believe
somebody could have used them for other reasons. Even if somebody wanted to get a hold of the photographer of a photograph they "took off his site" just to review and evaluate it, they might have a problem finding where they got it because he did not have a watermark on the photograph. Even if the photographs are copied and then only used on web-sites, the web-site business still should pay the photographer for that use. That makes it a "commercial value." It would be so easy for web-sites to use many unmarked photographs and some photographs would allow even printed materials being made from them. Yes, I agree my original Watermark is somewhat distracting. I am a little gun-shy or overprotective myself. I have changed it, but I have not changed all the photos on my main site yet. Gee whiz, over 900 photos is a lot to do, AGAIN... I will do it, but I have been rather busy lately. It would seem that your images would benefit from a watermark also. I took a look at your photos (pretty nice) an you are selling 4x6 prints, to people of your horse photos. With an web image size of 8.8x6.6 @ 72PPI, that is plenty large enough for some people to print nice 4x6, 5x7 and with a little work larger photographs. IMHO. -- PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson) Over 1,000 Photographs Online at, http://PhotoStockFile.com On 10/20/03 1:45 PM, in article xbVkb.4513$B_2.781@okepread02, "ralford" wrote: Question - is there any "value" to reduced sized web photos? Certainly a print couldn't be made of any commercial value, IMHO. Also, with respect, I find your (PWW) copyright across the heart of the picture very distracting. Cheers, rma "PWW" wrote in message ... You have some nice images in there. I might make them smaller, and easier to see. I would also recommend putting a some sort of visible watermark on your images otherwise they might end up in someone elsešs portfolio. -- PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson) Over 1,000 Photographs Online at, http://PhotoStockFile.com On 10/19/03 11:41 PM, in article , "Shu" wrote: Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks. Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line. You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies. http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm Ronald |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
Thanks Dave,
-- PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson) Over 1,000 Photographs Online at, http://PhotoStockFile.com On 10/21/03 8:10 PM, in article . net, "DaveS" wrote: "PWW" wrote: snip That is why I recommend putting a visible watermark on each and every image I put on the web. And use a lower snip I think you have a very nice site, and if someone wants to buy the image, the watermark is not that distracting. Have fun, Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies | Shu | General Photography Techniques | 18 | October 29th 03 08:05 PM |