A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Odd statement from Canon



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 14th 05, 02:43 AM
RichA
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Odd statement from Canon

That to have implemented an anti-dust system in their top
camera would have been too expensive.
I don't get this? Olympus E-300 is $700 and it has it.
Canon's top DSLR is $8000.00...


"Bittorrents are REFUNDS for all the BAD movie products Hollywood
never gave us refunds for in the past"
  #2  
Old August 14th 05, 03:20 AM
Darrell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"RichA" wrote in message
...
That to have implemented an anti-dust system in their top
camera would have been too expensive.
I don't get this? Olympus E-300 is $700 and it has it.
Canon's top DSLR is $8000.00...

Canon's SDI system used lasers to destroy dust before they got too close to
the sensor.





  #4  
Old August 14th 05, 05:17 AM
Stacey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Brian Baird wrote:


Would you please stop with these ridiculous posts?


Why not just ignore them if it bothers you so much?
--

Stacey
  #7  
Old August 14th 05, 02:48 PM
Siggy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In ,
Brian Baird scwibbled:


There may be patents in play that would prevent other dSLR manufacturers
from using the Olympus method without paying hefty licensing fees.

Would you please stop with these ridiculous posts?


Is this group for pre-approved members only?
When compared (unfairly) with the kind of drivel and bad-temper often posted
in open forums, he does rather well don't you think? And I find them thought
provoking on occasions, or just of no particular interest at others. If you
new anything about group dynamics, you'd know that most contain their
'sentinel' types, and have a role to play. So how about a bit of
laissez-faire, please?

jm2p
--
Nigel_H


  #8  
Old August 14th 05, 03:02 PM
Randall Ainsworth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , RichA
wrote:

That to have implemented an anti-dust system in their top
camera would have been too expensive.
I don't get this? Olympus E-300 is $700 and it has it.
Canon's top DSLR is $8000.00...


Then maybe you shouldn't buy it.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zoom lens for Canon 300D - Tamron/Canon Siddhartha Jain Digital SLR Cameras 13 January 16th 05 05:35 PM
Canon 10D Art Salmons Digital Photography 15 October 20th 04 11:29 PM
Canon 10D lens choice and comments Art Salmons Digital Photography 3 October 17th 04 11:02 PM
FA Canon EOS bodies, "L" Lenses, access... J&C 35mm Equipment for Sale 0 December 20th 03 04:28 AM
TRADE canon for canon gene 35mm Equipment for Sale 0 November 1st 03 06:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.