If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"New" sensor technology article
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20427295.100-cheap-naked-chips-snap-a-perfect-picture.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=tech
Eric Miller www.dyesscreek.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"New" sensor technology article
"Eric Miller" wrote in message ... http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20427295.100-cheap-naked-chips-snap-a-perfect-picture.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=tech Thanks for posting. I remember years ago troubleshooting a very high frequency amplifier that would not "hold still." Turned out that the main RF transistor case was flawed and was admitting light which was affecting the bias and the gain and the noise. Knotty problem solved with a drop of black goop! Anyway, all semiconductor devices are light sensitive, some more than others. No way that memory chips are properly configured to be photo sensors. My guess is that the article was written by one with limited knowledge in this arena. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"New" sensor technology article
In article , Eric Miller
writes http://www.newscientist.com/article/...naked-chips-sn ap-a-perfect-picture.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=tech We really are desperate for news in this field, aren't we. I recall making an imaging sensor from a 64kbit DRAM about 30 years ago! 256x256 pixels, framing at TV rates! And that was following instructions from an article in a popular electronics magazine, though its so long ago I can't even recall which one it was, so I doubt I was alone! -- Kennedy Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed; A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's ****ed. Python Philosophers (replace 'nospam' with 'kennedym' when replying) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"New" sensor technology article
Kennedy McEwen wrote:
In article , Eric Miller writes http://www.newscientist.com/article/...naked-chips-sn ap-a-perfect-picture.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=tech We really are desperate for news in this field, aren't we. I recall making an imaging sensor from a 64kbit DRAM about 30 years ago! 256x256 pixels, framing at TV rates! And that was following instructions from an article in a popular electronics magazine, though its so long ago I can't even recall which one it was, so I doubt I was alone! Yup, it was a popular way of building small cheap cameras for robot vision. The best chips were the MIL-spec ceramic bodied chips with metal lids which could be carefully soldered off. Grey scales were obtained by repeatedly reading the memory cell while the light charge built up -- the longer the time to flip, the darker the cell. But today's young engineers are so hooked on novelty they refuse to read anything published before they were born :-) -- Chris Malcolm |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"New" sensor technology article
Eric Miller wrote:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20427295.100-cheap-naked-chips-snap-a-perfect-picture.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=tech Eric Miller www.dyesscreek.com Digital film has arrived. :-) Just drop the card in your old film camera and shoot. Remove the card to download the image. Wipe the dust off & shoot another... I'd guess full frame 35mm will be a couple grand or more but the rest is just that simple, plus some software. I like it. -- Paul Furman www.edgehill.net www.baynatives.com all google groups messages filtered due to spam |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"New" sensor technology article
Kennedy McEwen wrote:
In article , Eric Miller writes http://www.newscientist.com/article/...naked-chips-sn ap-a-perfect-picture.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=tech We really are desperate for news in this field, aren't we. I recall making an imaging sensor from a 64kbit DRAM about 30 years ago! 256x256 pixels, framing at TV rates! And that was following instructions from an article in a popular electronics magazine, though its so long ago I can't even recall which one it was, so I doubt I was alone! Along with turning a transistor (cheap) into a photocell (not so cheap) by sawing the top of the can... BugBear |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"New" sensor technology article
"Bob Larter" wrote in message ... bugbear wrote: [] Along with turning a transistor (cheap) into a photocell (not so cheap) by sawing the top of the can... Yep, eg; a BC108. And I've even seen it done with an OC71, if anyone here is old enough to remember them. With them, you scraped the paint off the glass package. How big - physically - a 12MP array of OC71s and filters? And why do they have silicon diodes in transparent packages? http://luguang.en.alibaba.com/produc....html#inSearch David |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"New" sensor technology article
Bob Larter wrote: Kennedy McEwen wrote: In article , Eric Miller writes http://www.newscientist.com/article/...naked-chips-sn ap-a-perfect-picture.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=tech We really are desperate for news in this field, aren't we. I recall making an imaging sensor from a 64kbit DRAM about 30 years ago! 256x256 pixels, framing at TV rates! And that was following instructions from an article in a popular electronics magazine, though its so long ago I can't even recall which one it was, Byte magazine published an article on how to do that, so that may be the one you're thinking of. Steve Ciarcia wrote the article. I think Micromint created a kit. It was published in Byte Vol. 8, No. 9 Sept 1983 and republished in several best of Circuit Cellar. http://books.google.ca/books?id=sM6K...d=0CAwQ6AEwAA# w.. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"New" sensor technology article
Bob Larter wrote:
bugbear wrote: Kennedy McEwen wrote: In article , Eric Miller writes http://www.newscientist.com/article/...naked-chips-sn ap-a-perfect-picture.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=tech We really are desperate for news in this field, aren't we. I recall making an imaging sensor from a 64kbit DRAM about 30 years ago! 256x256 pixels, framing at TV rates! And that was following instructions from an article in a popular electronics magazine, though its so long ago I can't even recall which one it was, so I doubt I was alone! Along with turning a transistor (cheap) into a photocell (not so cheap) by sawing the top of the can... Yep, eg; a BC108. And I've even seen it done with an OC71, if anyone here is old enough to remember them. With them, you scraped the paint off the glass package. Or (nowadays), just use a teensy little LED. No sawing req'd. -- Jeff R. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"New" sensor technology article
"Bob Larter" wrote in message ...
[] I've never heard of diodes being affected by light, although I suppose that - at least in theory - it's possible that they are somewhat light sensitive. Indeed they are - photo-diodes! I'm guessing that the packaging excludes light getting to the active area. Early diodes had the same black paint as transistors, such as the middle component he http://www.reuk.co.uk/Germanium-Diodes.htm Cheers, David |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Corset-Boi" Bob "Lionel Lauer" Larter has grown a "pair" and returned to AUK................ | \The Great One\ | Digital Photography | 0 | July 14th 09 12:04 AM |
Interesting "Angle of View" Article with helpful chart on B&H | Me | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | June 25th 09 11:35 AM |
NEWS: Sony Develops New Close Proximity Wireless Transfer Technology "TransferJet" | John Navas[_2_] | Digital Photography | 2 | January 15th 08 04:27 PM |
"Face detection" technology from law enforcement or the military? | Rich | Digital Photography | 15 | September 8th 07 09:55 AM |
NY Times Article: Camera introduces an "eBay Mode?????" | Jeremy | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | March 14th 06 10:38 PM |