|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
December 24th 10, 02:56 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
Olympus 4/3rds sensors still appear to be about 0.5 stops moresensitive than APS units
RichA wrote, inter alia:
At 200 ISO, if you look at the upper right shoulder of the Bailey's bottle, you'll see lots of dust detail in the Olympus shot, but the others are too dark. The Canon shot is better than the Nikon or Pentax shots. http://dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxk5/page20.asp The shots were taken at different times. Different amounts of dust appear in the images as a result. Things get dusty over time. Eric Miller www.dyesscreek.com 
|
|
#2
December 26th 10, 01:26 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Olympus 4/3rds sensors still appear to be about 0.5 stops more sensitive than APS units
Eric Miller wrote in news:if126a$pen$1
@news.eternal-september.org: RichA wrote, inter alia: At 200 ISO, if you look at the upper right shoulder of the Bailey's bottle, you'll see lots of dust detail in the Olympus shot, but the others are too dark. The Canon shot is better than the Nikon or Pentax shots. http://dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxk5/page20.asp The shots were taken at different times. Different amounts of dust appear in the images as a result. Things get dusty over time. Eric Miller www.dyesscreek.com Boy, that is a stretch.
|
|
#3
December 27th 10, 02:24 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Olympus 4/3rds sensors still appear to be about 0.5 stops moresensitive than APS units
Rich wrote:
Eric Miller wrote in news:if126a$pen$1 @news.eternal-september.org: RichA wrote, inter alia: At 200 ISO, if you look at the upper right shoulder of the Bailey's bottle, you'll see lots of dust detail in the Olympus shot, but the others are too dark. The Canon shot is better than the Nikon or Pentax shots. http://dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxk5/page20.asp The shots were taken at different times. Different amounts of dust appear in the images as a result. Things get dusty over time. Eric Miller www.dyesscreek.com Boy, that is a stretch. If by "stretch" you mean fact. Sure. Eric Miller www.dyesscreek.com
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| As the "S/S Olympus 4/3rds" ship sinks, (Olympus abandoned it), the crew get more violent! | R. Mark Clayton | Digital SLR Cameras | 7 | October 6th 10 06:04 PM |
| Olympus 4/3rds advantages fading | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 32 | September 27th 09 07:51 PM |
| Olympus 4/3rds advantages fading | Miles Bader[_2_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 35 | September 27th 09 12:44 PM |
| Olympus 4/3rds advantages fading | Neil Harrington[_3_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 7 | September 26th 09 02:44 PM |
| Canon 5D stops Olympus E-410 into the dust | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 12 | June 5th 07 03:14 AM |
Linear Mode
