If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How Many Have Switched?
I swore I would never switch, but about 3 years ago went 'all in'. I updated
all our equipment in the stduio, went with a fully digital workflow, and all our commercial work is now shot on digital equipment (35mm and MF). I still have a 4x5 camera, but haven't used it in a couple years now other than to occasionally rent a digital back for it for odd jobs. Stephen "Duncan Allan" wrote in message ... I like both and whilst I have the choice will use both. These are tools to be used and not a matter of what you should be doing but what is appropriate for your needs of the job, pleasure or convenience. The end result of satisfaction for yourself and also the client if there is one and ultimately being paid no matter what format I use. Duncan "Gregory Blank" wrote in message ... In article . com, "wilkie" wrote: I'm an amateur and I haven't visited this group for around 5 years now. Since that time, I purchased a lovely Nikon F3 on Ebay which I used only twice before buying a digital camera. I haven't used film since. The convenience of no film and ability to manipulate images using Photoshop are just too attrtactive for someone like me. I have had 2 Bar Mitvahs for my sons. Both were shot by pros. The first, around 5 years ago was shot with a medium format. Beautiful pics. The second, around 2 years ago was shot digitally. The pics are colorful and vivid, buty not as "velvety", but the real value was in the special effects that Photoshop allowed them to do in the album, i.e., shado dropping, backgrounds, sepia, etc. - a big attraction for me, the consumer. I know the film/digital war has been raging in this group forever, and looking back on some of the posts, there were some people swearing they'd never ever switch to digital. So, since that time, in the last 5 years, how many of you pros have switched to digital, and were you one of those who swore thay never would? I personally do both, and I feel that each merits its own reasons for doing them, I let the customer and the job decide. If I had to choose I would stick with film, mainly because scanning is always an option. The turn around for digital is nice though. -- LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Are you folks MAC or PC? | baker1 | Digital Photography | 242 | January 10th 06 01:35 PM |
Thinking of Our British Friends | Walt Hanks | Digital SLR Cameras | 143 | July 17th 05 02:14 PM |
300D crippled firmware | Dirty Harry | Digital SLR Cameras | 21 | April 25th 05 05:01 AM |