If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
VGA vs HD video resolution on a P & S... How important...???
"BIG DAVE" wrote in message ... I am thinking of spending about $100 (give or take) on an entry level point and shoot digital camera. Lots of the features of these cameras are quite similar however there is one difference that I am curious about. Video resolution. Some cameras have a video resolution listed as VGA and some claim to have HD resolution. Almost all of them say 30 FPS. How much better would the quality of the video be on the cameras that have HD video capability? Should it be a deal breaker/maker? All I intend to do is perhaps shoot some home video clips or maybe even upload a clip or two to YouTube etc... Are the so called HD clips gonna be that much clearer? Are they much bigger from a technical standpoint? Again, the specs of these cameras as far as shooting stills are very similar. Is it worth the extra $20-$40 for the HD? Thanks... DAVE What the others said...;-) With a few additions: Even for YouTube, the 16x9 format and larger playing size can "present" better. I've been doing some editing for a friend using AVCHD-Lite and Mov material (plus stills), and while the stills can look spectacular in the video from a *good* pocket camera (after a little work...), the video from the 720p material was marginal at best, even with MUCH work, when viewed on a good 1080p TV. If the camera will AF, AE, AWB, and also permit zooming while shooting, get it (but at $100?????), but as an experiment, I placed on a timeline 640x480 WMV (with the resultant black bars all around), the same blown up to fit the 16x9 format, MOV, AVCHD-Light, and HDV files and rendered them to one HDV file. To my surprise, the first two looked better than I thought they would (and, OK, but...), the next two were better (in different ways, but not by as much as I had expected), and not surprisingly, the HDV (video camera only) was the best. BTW, better yet is the new Panasonic 60p 1080 format - it is SHARP in their TM700 camcorder. And, BTW, I have available a mint, low-use HV20 (HDV - easy to edit) and a mint, low-use AVCHD 60p Panasonic (I just acquired a second one in a trade for lenses, and I don't need two...;-). --DR (My email address can be had at www.donferrario.com/ruether if interested in either camcorder...) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When will video SCREENS catch up with camera resolution? | peter | Digital Photography | 5 | December 19th 10 01:46 PM |
Adam Gadahn (Azzam) # An Invitation To Reflection And Repentance #((IMPORTANT VIDEO)) | 1111 | Digital Photography | 0 | January 6th 08 11:09 PM |
Lens for Digital SLR, Resolution vs. Contract, which is more important | Einst Stein | 35mm Photo Equipment | 8 | August 13th 07 07:13 AM |
Sony p 200 video resolution | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 1 | December 19th 05 04:59 PM |