If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Google paid Apple $1B bribe
On 1/22/2016 10:38 PM, Rich A wrote:
http://phys.org/news/2016-01-google-...n-iphones.html So every tenant pays the landlord a bribe. I am not an Appleseed, but your anti Apple posting, is a disgusting misrepresentation of a rational business decision. Candidly, I can't decide whether you or nospam have the greater need for attention. -- PeterN |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Google paid Apple $1B bribe
On 1/23/2016 1:11 PM, RichA wrote:
On Friday, 22 January 2016 22:57:19 UTC-5, peterN wrote: On 1/22/2016 10:38 PM, Rich A wrote: http://phys.org/news/2016-01-google-...n-iphones.html So every tenant pays the landlord a bribe. I am not an Appleseed, but your anti Apple posting, is a disgusting misrepresentation of a rational business decision. Candidly, I can't decide whether you or nospam have the greater need for attention. -- PeterN And yet Microsoft had numerous court challenges brought against it just for having its own browser exclusive to Windows. And your point is? You were talking about Apple. Stick to the point. -- PeterN |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Google paid Apple $1B bribe
On 2016-01-23 21:24:10 +0000, RichA said:
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 14:09:24 UTC-5, peterN wrote: On 1/23/2016 1:11 PM, RichA wrote: On Friday, 22 January 2016 22:57:19 UTC-5, peterN wrote: On 1/22/2016 10:38 PM, Rich A wrote: http://phys.org/news/2016-01-google-...n-iphones.html So every tenant pays the landlord a bribe. I am not an Appleseed, but your anti Apple posting, is a disgusting misrepresentation of a rational business decision. Candidly, I can't decide whether you or nospam have the greater need for attention. -- PeterN And yet Microsoft had numerous court challenges brought against it just for having its own browser exclusive to Windows. And your point is? You were talking about Apple. Stick to the point. -- PeterN It's the same thing, attempting to restrict or heavily influence user's choice of browser. Then bypass the deal and just use Chrome. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Google paid Apple $1B bribe
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 10:11:10 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote: On Friday, 22 January 2016 22:57:19 UTC-5, peterN wrote: On 1/22/2016 10:38 PM, Rich A wrote: http://phys.org/news/2016-01-google-...n-iphones.html So every tenant pays the landlord a bribe. I am not an Appleseed, but your anti Apple posting, is a disgusting misrepresentation of a rational business decision. Candidly, I can't decide whether you or nospam have the greater need for attention. -- PeterN And yet Microsoft had numerous court challenges brought against it just for having its own browser exclusive to Windows. That wasn't at all why they were taken to court. They were taken to court for making the browser as an integral part of the Windows operating system and effectively selling it for nothing. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Google paid Apple $1B bribe
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: And yet Microsoft had numerous court challenges brought against it just for having its own browser exclusive to Windows. That wasn't at all why they were taken to court. They were taken to court for making the browser as an integral part of the Windows operating system and effectively selling it for nothing. they were taken to court for abuse of their monopoly position. bundling and giving away a browser that's tightly tied to microsoft's own server software fits that description. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Google paid Apple $1B bribe
On 1/23/16 PDT 6:13 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 10:11:10 -0800 (PST), RichA wrote: On Friday, 22 January 2016 22:57:19 UTC-5, peterN wrote: On 1/22/2016 10:38 PM, Rich A wrote: http://phys.org/news/2016-01-google-...n-iphones.html So every tenant pays the landlord a bribe. I am not an Appleseed, but your anti Apple posting, is a disgusting misrepresentation of a rational business decision. Candidly, I can't decide whether you or nospam have the greater need for attention. -- PeterN And yet Microsoft had numerous court challenges brought against it just for having its own browser exclusive to Windows. That wasn't at all why they were taken to court. They were taken to court for making the browser as an integral part of the Windows operating system and effectively selling it for nothing. Not to mention scewing around with the OS to make other browsers seem to misbehave. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Who knows what they paid Apple to switch? | Mr. Strat | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | November 6th 09 04:26 AM |
Who knows what they paid Apple to switch? | David J Taylor[_12_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 2 | November 4th 09 10:38 PM |
Who knows what they paid Apple to switch? | Troy Piggins[_32_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | November 4th 09 07:02 PM |
Thank you Mr Google & Apple | 2Barter.net | Digital Photography | 0 | July 26th 07 01:47 AM |
Get Paid to Surf ADs... I am already Paid | coolguy17111987 | Digital Photography | 3 | July 1st 07 12:26 AM |