|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
November 7th 04, 02:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Another Minolta lens review:
I prepared a small review to compare how does the new 24-105mm zoom
compare to other Minolta primes. Check the following link for more details: http://voronoi.sbp.ri.cmu.edu/~esham...zoom_vs_prime/ As usual all constructive comments are welcome, (Thanks Alan) Elie 
|
|
#2
November 7th 04, 02:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please take your OT photo posts to alt.politics or alt.religion
|
|
#3
November 7th 04, 02:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please take your OT photo posts to alt.politics or alt.religion
|
|
#4
November 7th 04, 02:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Annika1980 wrote: Please take your OT photo posts to alt.politics or alt.religion Hahaha, good one. Will do as soon as you sell all your Canon digital equipment, or even better trade it all for a Zenit SLR with a lens cap acting as a pinhole lens. Elie
|
|
#5
November 7th 04, 02:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Annika1980 wrote: Please take your OT photo posts to alt.politics or alt.religion Hahaha, good one. Will do as soon as you sell all your Canon digital equipment, or even better trade it all for a Zenit SLR with a lens cap acting as a pinhole lens. Elie
|
|
#6
November 7th 04, 07:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Elie A Shammas wrote:
I prepared a small review to compare how does the new 24-105mm zoom compare to other Minolta primes. Check the following link for more details: http://voronoi.sbp.ri.cmu.edu/~esham...zoom_vs_prime/ As usual all constructive comments are welcome, (Thanks Alan) Well done Elie. Regarding the note at the end of the page, why do you want to get rid of the 50 f/1.4 in favour of the 50 f/1.7? I like my 50 f/1.7, mind you. Cheers, Alan -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- [SI rulz] http://www.aliasimages.com/si/rulz.html -- [SI gallery] www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
|
|
#7
November 7th 04, 07:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Elie A Shammas wrote:
I prepared a small review to compare how does the new 24-105mm zoom compare to other Minolta primes. Check the following link for more details: http://voronoi.sbp.ri.cmu.edu/~esham...zoom_vs_prime/ As usual all constructive comments are welcome, (Thanks Alan) Well done Elie. Regarding the note at the end of the page, why do you want to get rid of the 50 f/1.4 in favour of the 50 f/1.7? I like my 50 f/1.7, mind you. Cheers, Alan -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- [SI rulz] http://www.aliasimages.com/si/rulz.html -- [SI gallery] www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
|
|
#8
November 7th 04, 07:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Elie A Shammas wrote:
I prepared a small review to compare how does the new 24-105mm zoom compare to other Minolta primes. Check the following link for more details: http://voronoi.sbp.ri.cmu.edu/~esham...zoom_vs_prime/ As usual all constructive comments are welcome, (Thanks Alan) Well done Elie. Regarding the note at the end of the page, why do you want to get rid of the 50 f/1.4 in favour of the 50 f/1.7? I like my 50 f/1.7, mind you. Cheers, Alan -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- [SI rulz] http://www.aliasimages.com/si/rulz.html -- [SI gallery] www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
|
|
#9
November 7th 04, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Alan Browne wrote: Elie A Shammas wrote: I prepared a small review to compare how does the new 24-105mm zoom compare to other Minolta primes. Check the following link for more details: http://voronoi.sbp.ri.cmu.edu/~esham...zoom_vs_prime/ As usual all constructive comments are welcome, (Thanks Alan) Well done Elie. Regarding the note at the end of the page, why do you want to get rid of the 50 f/1.4 in favour of the 50 f/1.7? I like my 50 f/1.7, mind you. Cheaper, for the price of the 50mmf/1.4, I can get the 50mm f/1.7 and 135mm f/2.8 (of course used). Plus, I was not using it that much, so I couldn't justify keeping it. Elie
|
|
#10
November 7th 04, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Alan Browne wrote: Elie A Shammas wrote: I prepared a small review to compare how does the new 24-105mm zoom compare to other Minolta primes. Check the following link for more details: http://voronoi.sbp.ri.cmu.edu/~esham...zoom_vs_prime/ As usual all constructive comments are welcome, (Thanks Alan) Well done Elie. Regarding the note at the end of the page, why do you want to get rid of the 50 f/1.4 in favour of the 50 f/1.7? I like my 50 f/1.7, mind you. Cheaper, for the price of the 50mmf/1.4, I can get the 50mm f/1.7 and 135mm f/2.8 (of course used). Plus, I was not using it that much, so I couldn't justify keeping it. Elie
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rolleiflex Automat weird problem | Dmitry Poplavsky | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 25 | December 9th 04 10:01 AM |
| Bought a Minolta Maxxum 5 and a Tamron 28-200mm LD IF Super lens | Siddhartha Jain | 35mm Photo Equipment | 25 | October 30th 04 09:29 PM |
| Very interesting Canon lens review site | deryck lant | 35mm Photo Equipment | 10 | October 8th 04 05:18 AM |
| Caltar lens bubbles | Tom Phillips | Large Format Photography Equipment | 4 | October 2nd 04 10:16 PM |
| Minolta DSLR first review | dwight | Digital Photography | 5 | August 13th 04 03:51 PM |
Linear Mode
