If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Has the "blurred water time-exposure" shot run its "course?"
RichA wrote:
Seems like nearly ever shot of water I see today is a time exposure using ND filters to get the water to blur. It was fine, effective in the beginning when I started seeing it, but now it's getting overdone. It's been done since the 1860's - and they didn't need ND filters. I don't suppose it's going to stop any time soon. BugBear |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Has the "blurred water time-exposure" shot run its "course?"
On 2012-08-13 05:35 , bugbear wrote:
RichA wrote: Seems like nearly ever shot of water I see today is a time exposure using ND filters to get the water to blur. It was fine, effective in the beginning when I started seeing it, but now it's getting overdone. It's been done since the 1860's - and they didn't need ND filters. I don't suppose it's going to stop any time soon. Ah, that good ole ISO 0.00025 film. We don't need no stinkin' ND filters. Now, when the powder burns you won't see anything for a few days and that's why ya gots to pay up front! -- "C'mon boys, you're not laying pipe!". -John Keating. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Has the "blurred water time-exposure" shot run its "course?" | Alan Browne | Digital SLR Cameras | 50 | August 20th 12 03:13 AM |