If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Another Exposure 7 Trial Shot
On 4/16/15 PDT 12:38 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2015-04-16 19:16:42 +0000, Savageduck said: On 2015-04-16 16:15:00 +0000, John McWilliams said: On 4/16/15 PDT 8:12 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-16 14:33:58 +0000, Tony Cooper said: On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:29:20 -0700, Savageduck wrote: You can discuss the non-HDR qualities of these two, This time a 1915 Indian. https://db.tt/UL717ftr ...and a little something in B&W. https://db.tt/DB7Dnw4C The black and white is well done. Who's your model. The step-daughter from Hell? She is, the then 13 year old daughter of an old girl friend. That shot with the blowing hair was taken with her sitting in the back of a moving car with the window down. The step-daughter from Hell was once a very attractive young girl/woman, but she has pretty much ruined those once quite good looks with her mental health & substance abuse (now under sober & under control) problems. The Indian is a nice, sharp documentary-type photo. I am somewhat distracted by the person standing directly above the "I" in "Indian" who seems to have sagging and blurred breasts. I guess in the experiment/trial, I over did that blurring, but those guys had been cut off at the waist due to my sloppy in-camera composition. So I figured some type of blur might take them out of it completely, but I didn't execute it very well. The bike was the intended point of interest, as I wasn't thinking character study for that shot. That's a photo that cries out for a human interest angle. Maybe a Harley biker in full leathers and gang patches or a very old man who looks like he may have coveted an Indian at an earlier point in his life. Otherwise, it's just a sharp representation of a mechanical thing. Or clone over those non-people with admiring hot chicks. Have you lifted the bike image to put on a plainer b/g? There have been times I have thought of doing something like that. However, even with the various masking tool I have at my disposal that sort of extraction, where there is a busy background, and stuff such as wire spokes to deal with, doing that can be time consuming with minimal return. Sometimes it is less of a problem and an easy fix can be found. In the case of this Sears there was a guy in the background with his head appearing to be resting on the saddle. the healing tool fixed that. https://db.tt/pVjxImoh ...and not much to remove for this Indian. https://db.tt/pVjxImoh Oops! Here is the Sears. https://db.tt/MT8y0JxW Ah! Nice! |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Another Exposure 7 Trial Shot
On 2015-04-18 22:43:44 +0000, John McWilliams said:
On 4/16/15 PDT 12:44 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-16 19:34:33 +0000, Savageduck said: On 2015-04-16 16:11:18 +0000, John McWilliams said: Did you bump both highlights and shadow? I processed the RAW color file first to get to a reasonably presentable color image. That included adding a quite strong blur on the perimeter. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_101.jpg Oops! Again. Here is the color. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_104.jpg Next I took it into the Exposure 7 Trial and made the B&W conversion by selecting one ot their stock B&W film presets (Fuji NeoPan 100 Acros) with a yellow filter. Then I added a vignette to finish. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_103.jpg I had fun playing with the brightness on my Mac's screen: very different effects. With that image? Yes, the one after "Ooops"! Did you increase highlights and or shadow controls? Or were they changed by the B+W conversion- or elsewhere? No bump to the highlights. However, the added vignette certainly deepened the shadows. That was done in Exposure 7 with the B&W conversion. Using the NeoPan 100 Acros film type might well have had some effect on the highlights, but I made no deliberate adjustment. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Another Exposure 7 Trial Shot
On 4/18/15 PDT 4:23 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2015-04-18 22:43:44 +0000, John McWilliams said: On 4/16/15 PDT 12:44 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-16 19:34:33 +0000, Savageduck said: On 2015-04-16 16:11:18 +0000, John McWilliams said: Did you bump both highlights and shadow? I processed the RAW color file first to get to a reasonably presentable color image. That included adding a quite strong blur on the perimeter. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_101.jpg Oops! Again. Here is the color. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_104.jpg Next I took it into the Exposure 7 Trial and made the B&W conversion by selecting one ot their stock B&W film presets (Fuji NeoPan 100 Acros) with a yellow filter. Then I added a vignette to finish. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_103.jpg I had fun playing with the brightness on my Mac's screen: very different effects. With that image? Yes, the one after "Ooops"! Did you increase highlights and or shadow controls? Or were they changed by the B+W conversion- or elsewhere? No bump to the highlights. However, the added vignette certainly deepened the shadows. That was done in Exposure 7 with the B&W conversion. Using the NeoPan 100 Acros film type might well have had some effect on the highlights, but I made no deliberate adjustment. Cool. Thanks for the specs. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Another Exposure 7 Trial Shot
On 4/15/2015 4:38 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2015-04-15 20:34:00 +0000, Savageduck said: Here is a Lightroom adjusted original (top left) compared with two Exposure 7 renditions. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_98.jpg Here is what the color version looks like on its own. https://db.tt/Q19nZvE6 Looks like you're having a ball. -- PeterN |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Another Exposure 7 Trial Shot
On 4/15/2015 10:48 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2015-04-16 02:37:30 +0000, RichA said: On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 16:34:08 UTC-4, Savageduck wrote: Here is a Lightroom adjusted original (top left) compared with two Exposure 7 renditions. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_98.jpg "Go on an write me up for 125" "Post my face wanted dead or alive" "Take my license, all that jive." "I..can't stand....HDR!!" That's good to know since nothing in the processing of that single image had anything to so with HDR. It was a single RAW image with initial procssing in Lightroom 5, and just run through "Exposure 7" as a Lightroom plug-in. So now what do you think of "Exposure 7" which doesn't do HDR? http://www.alienskin.com/exposure/ For the extra 50 bucks, it pays to ge the whole bundle -- PeterN |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Another Exposure 7 Trial Shot
On 2015-04-19 20:36:09 +0000, PeterN said:
On 4/15/2015 4:38 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-15 20:34:00 +0000, Savageduck said: Here is a Lightroom adjusted original (top left) compared with two Exposure 7 renditions. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_98.jpg Here is what the color version looks like on its own. https://db.tt/Q19nZvE6 Looks like you're having a ball. Yup! However, certain folks here seem to think that is an HDR image (it isnt), and so turn their noses up at my little experiment. At the moment I am in a manic spending mode (that tax refund helps) so who knows what direction it will lead me in. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Another Exposure 7 Trial Shot
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 13:49:06 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: At the moment I am in a manic spending mode Those are always good. Always. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Another Exposure 7 Trial Shot
On 4/19/2015 4:49 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2015-04-19 20:36:09 +0000, PeterN said: On 4/15/2015 4:38 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-15 20:34:00 +0000, Savageduck said: Here is a Lightroom adjusted original (top left) compared with two Exposure 7 renditions. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_98.jpg Here is what the color version looks like on its own. https://db.tt/Q19nZvE6 Looks like you're having a ball. Yup! However, certain folks here seem to think that is an HDR image (it isnt), and so turn their noses up at my little experiment. At the moment I am in a manic spending mode (that tax refund helps) so who knows what direction it will lead me in. That helps the economy. -- PeterN |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Another Exposure 7 Trial Shot
On 2015-04-15 20:34:00 +0000, Savageduck said:
Here is a Lightroom adjusted original (top left) compared with two Exposure 7 renditions. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_98.jpg Now that Lightroom CC (2015) is installed, here is an Exposure 7 B&W conversion done after Lightroom CC adjustments: https://db.tt/F3McVgSY -- Regards, Savageduck |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Exposure 7 Plug-in Trial | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 9 | April 18th 15 05:45 PM |
Has the "blurred water time-exposure" shot run its "course?" | Alan Browne | Digital SLR Cameras | 50 | August 20th 12 03:13 AM |
Has the "blurred water time-exposure" shot run its "course?" | bugbear | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | August 13th 12 10:13 PM |
NX2 trial | saycheez | Digital Photography | 2 | June 21st 08 12:06 AM |
Olympus Camera SDK - Trial Version? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 1 | June 27th 07 09:26 AM |