If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Ken" writes:
"Michael Meissner" wrote in message ... My main quibble has always been the external flash interface -- when you shoot in manual mode (which you need to do with non-TTL flashes), the EVF/LCD reflects the actual aperture you select (ie, f/4, f/5.6, etc.) which means it is very dark, and hard to frame. Yes, it would be nice if the display gained up in low light situations. The darkend display is actually a design "feature" that backfired on them. I can understand it in the FZ10, since it was there first camera with an external flash. But to repeat the mistake in the FZ20 after tons of people have complained about it is just hard headedness. Every camera vendor seems to have their own areas of blindness, that no amount of clue-by-4's seem to overcome. A secondary quibble is the placement of the memory door in the battery compartment, which means you have to remove the camera from the flash bracket or tripod just to change memory cards. Having the tripod screw that close to the battery door means you can't use any of the standard quick release adaptors. I solved the tripod hole problem by making a simple adapter. I can keep a tripod quick release plate on the camera and still change the battery or memory card. Still have to take the camera off the tripod but at least I don't have to remove the quick release plate. http://ken.smugmug.com/photos/17316489-L.jpg There is a guy on ebay that is selling a FZ-20 tripod adapter for $12. Not quite as versatile as the one I designed but better than nothing. http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZrobobear Yep. I just don't get why manufacturers seem to go out of their way to put in tripod sockets that aren't at the nodal point, made out of metal, and far enough away from the battery door so quick release mechanisms can be used. I get the sense that some of the designers just don't understand how a camera is used by higher end users. -- Michael Meissner email: http://www.the-meissners.org |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael Meissner" wrote in message ... Yep. I just don't get why manufacturers seem to go out of their way to put in tripod sockets that aren't at the nodal point, made out of metal, and far enough away from the battery door so quick release mechanisms can be used. I get the sense that some of the designers just don't understand how a camera is used by higher end users. Even thought I have never cracked the case on my FZ I have always presumed that it was a design trade-off to accomodate the placement of a much more important part of the camera's internal mechanisms. If it was placed there intentionally the person responsible should be burned at the stake. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Ken" writes:
"Michael Meissner" wrote in message ... Yep. I just don't get why manufacturers seem to go out of their way to put in tripod sockets that aren't at the nodal point, made out of metal, and far enough away from the battery door so quick release mechanisms can be used. I get the sense that some of the designers just don't understand how a camera is used by higher end users. Even thought I have never cracked the case on my FZ I have always presumed that it was a design trade-off to accomodate the placement of a much more important part of the camera's internal mechanisms. If it was placed there intentionally the person responsible should be burned at the stake. That's because manufacturers don't think it is important to do the job right. They know they have to put a socket in, but don't take the time to design it properly, possibily because they assume their market segment doesn't care. For 95-99% of the users, that is probably true. -- Michael Meissner email: http://www.the-meissners.org |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael Meissner" wrote in message ... "Ken" writes: "Michael Meissner" wrote in message ... Yep. I just don't get why manufacturers seem to go out of their way to put in tripod sockets that aren't at the nodal point, made out of metal, and far enough away from the battery door so quick release mechanisms can be used. I get the sense that some of the designers just don't understand how a camera is used by higher end users. Even thought I have never cracked the case on my FZ I have always presumed that it was a design trade-off to accomodate the placement of a much more important part of the camera's internal mechanisms. If it was placed there intentionally the person responsible should be burned at the stake. That's because manufacturers don't think it is important to do the job right. They know they have to put a socket in, but don't take the time to design it properly, possibily because they assume their market segment doesn't care. For 95-99% of the users, that is probably true. The consumer is as much to blame as the manufacturer. If the consumers were willing to pay for what it costs to design a product for maximum functionality the manufacturers would be more than willing to provide it for them. Consumers are typically frugal *******s who want the best products for prices much less than what manufacturers can afford to produce them. Manufacturers have to keep product costs down to appeal to the market segment that can afford them and if that means placing the tripod socket off to one side the consumer shares in the blame. I don't think it fair to blame the manufacturers exclusively. The old adage that you get what you pay for is as true today as it was when it was first coined. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Ken wrote: "Michael Meissner" wrote in message ... "Ken" writes: "Michael Meissner" wrote in message ... Yep. I just don't get why manufacturers seem to go out of their way to put in tripod sockets that aren't at the nodal point, made out of metal, and far enough away from the battery door so quick release mechanisms can be used. I get the sense that some of the designers just don't understand how a camera is used by higher end users. Even thought I have never cracked the case on my FZ I have always presumed that it was a design trade-off to accomodate the placement of a much more important part of the camera's internal mechanisms. If it was placed there intentionally the person responsible should be burned at the stake. That's because manufacturers don't think it is important to do the job right. They know they have to put a socket in, but don't take the time to design it properly, possibily because they assume their market segment doesn't care. For 95-99% of the users, that is probably true. The consumer is as much to blame as the manufacturer. If the consumers were willing to pay for what it costs to design a product for maximum functionality the manufacturers would be more than willing to provide it for them. Consumers are typically frugal *******s who want the best products for prices much less than what manufacturers can afford to produce them. That because they want the consumers to support those piggish upper management *******s. Look at Carli at HP. That is bull****! Manufacturers have to keep product costs down to appeal to the market segment that can afford them and if that means placing the tripod socket off to one side the consumer shares in the blame. I don't think it fair to blame the manufacturers exclusively. The old adage that you get what you pay for Yeh, that is why a DSLR costs about 4 time more than an SLR. is as true today as it was when it was first coined. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Yep. I just don't get why manufacturers seem to go out of their
way to put in tripod sockets that aren't at the nodal point, made out of metal, and far enough away from the battery door so quick release mechanisms can be used. I get the sense that some of the designers just don't understand how a camera is used by higher end users. With many cameras, having the socket under the lens centre would add 6mm to the camera height to allow for the socket depth. I think it is a case of trying to keep the dimensions down. BTW, as with other computer driven projects, does firmware for cameras get updated/new versions???? Has anyone managed to extract and reverse engineer a cameras "BIOS". I would have thought that with a USB connection, this should be possible. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Ken wrote:
"Pete Fenelon" wrote in message ... Rob wrote: Fuji has little things like a lanyard on the lens cap My main quibble with the FZs, apart from the terrible neck strap! I hope you didn't buy it just for the neck strap. You forgot to snipe about the off center tripod hole and the lack of a swivel LCD. I personally bought it for the quality of the optics, the IS and the beautiful f2.8 12x zoom lens. I can forgive them the mediocre neck strap and the lack of lens cap tether. Indeed. A few quid on a decent Tamrac strap and I was using the camera in comfort. The lens is astonishingly good (it's still surprising me after nine months with an FZ10), and the combination of f2.8 and IS means that you rarely need a tripod! pete -- "Send lawyers, guns and money...." |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Panasonic Lumix FZ15 ve FZ20 | Iris | Digital Photography | 27 | March 15th 05 10:31 AM |
Panasonic FZ20 - why bother? | Pattern-chaser | Digital Photography | 16 | December 30th 04 03:19 AM |
Panasonic Lumix Series (FZ3, FZ10, FZ20) | Lukas Varossieau | Digital ZLR Cameras | 8 | December 5th 04 08:15 AM |
Panasonic Lumix Series (FZ3, FZ10, FZ20) | Gareee© | Digital Photography | 3 | November 1st 04 03:10 PM |
Panasonic Lumix Series (FZ3, FZ10, FZ20) | Jessie Miletop | Digital Photography | 5 | November 1st 04 03:10 PM |